DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jesco Const. Corp. v. Nationsbank Corp., 830 So. 2d 989.

17 citing documents.

  • Deutsch Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-R4 v. … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
  • Commercial Credit Group, Inc. Versus Double R & J Trucking Service, Inc. and Hancock Whitney Bank La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
    10/25/02), Hovell v. Origin Bank, 20-1417 (La.
  • Brokenburn, Inc. v. Cross Keys Bank and Bradley Bridges La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
    10/25/02), and Hovell v. Origin Bank, 20-01417 (La.
  • Rita Garlington Weekley Chapman Leger v. Bank of New York, Mellon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
  • Barbara Mcnorton Hovell v. Origin Bank F/k/a Community Trust Bank La. 2021
    10/25/07), King v. Parish Nat’l Bank , 04-337 (La.
  • Plummer v. EverBank 195 So. 3d 693 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2016
    See, e.g., Jesco Const. Corp. v. Nationsbank Corp., 02-0057, p. 4 (La.10/25/02), (“all actions (or causes of action or theories of recovery) based upon an oral agreement to lend money are barred by the La.Rev.
  • Hancock Bank of Louisiana v. 3429 H, LLC 184 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Corp. v. Nations-Bank Corp., 02-0057 (La.10/25/02), , "The Louisiana Credit Agreement Statute precludes all actions for damages arising from oral credit agreements, regardless of the legal theory of recovery asserted.” .
  • Palmisano v. Nauman-Anderson 167 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Corp. v. NationsBank Corp. 02-0057 (La.10/25/02), , for the proposition that “[t]he Louisiana Credit Agreement Statute precludes all actions for damages arising from oral credit agreements, regardless of the legal theory of recovery stated.” However, both Ms. Nauman-Anderson and the trial court misread the Jesco case.
  • Woodlands Development, L.L.C. v. Regions Bank 141 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 6/12/13) , , writs denied, 13-2218, 13-2219 (La.12/2/13), , the court reviewed the jurisprudence interpreting this statute, as set forth in Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049 (La.10/16/95), ; Jesco Construction Co. v. Nationsbank Corp. 02-0057 (La.10/25/02), ; and King v. Parish National Bank, 04-337 (La.10/19/04), .
  • St. Landry Homestead Federal Savings Bank v. Hubert Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    10/25/02), wherein it responded affirmatively to the question certified by the United States Fifth Circuit of Court of Appeal, of “whether the Louisiana Credit Agreement Statute precludes all actions for damages arising from oral credit agreements, regardless of the legal theory of recovery.” Jesco Construction Corp. v
  • St. Landry Homestead Federal Savings Bank v. Vidrine 118 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    The impact of this statute on other causes of action arising from a creditor/debtor relationship was addressed by the Louisiana Supreme Court, in Jesco Construction Corp. v. Nationsbank Corp., 02-57, p. 1 (La.10/25/02), , wherein it responded affirmatively to the question certified by the United States Fifth Circuit of Court of Appeal, of “whether the Louisiana Credit Agreement *484 Statute precludes all actions for damages arising from oral credit agreements, regardless of the legal theory of r
  • L.A. Homes, Inc. v. First National Bank USA 110 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    See Jesco Construction Corp. v. Nationsbank Corp., 02-57 (La.10/25/02), ; Bolen v. Dengel, 340 F.3d 300 (5th Cir. 2003), cert.
  • Woodlands Development, L.L.C. v. Regions Bank 83 So. 3d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Jesco Construction Corp. v. Nationsbank Corp., 02-0057 (La.10/25/02), .
  • Davis v. Delta Bank 968 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    See also Jesco Construction Corporation v. Nationsbank Corporation, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/25/02), , and Fortenberry v. Hibernia National Bank, 37,266 (La.App.2d Cir.8/20/03), , holding that the Louisiana Credit Agreement Statute precludes all actions for damages arising from oral credit agreements, regardless of the legal theory of recovery.
  • Carter v. Duhe 921 So. 2d 963 La. 2006
    Corp. v. Nationsbank Corp., et al., 02-0057 (La.10/25/02), (Calogero, C.J., dissenting) (in a case involving the Credit Agreement Statute, Chief Justice Calogero discussed statutes, expressly including the NHWA, where the legislature has expressly and unequivocally precluded all other legal theories of recovery).
  • King v. Parish National Bank 885 So. 2d 540 La. 2004
    Corp. v. Nationsbank Corp., 02-0057 (La.10/25/02), , which applied a statute of frauds-like requirement to "all actions" to lend money between a borrower and creditor, the court of appeal held that none of King's allegations regarding PNB's representations or conduct in connection to the negotiation of the 1990 consolidated loan or PNB's decision to require payment co
  • Fortenberry v. Hibernia Nat. Bank 852 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    In Jesco Construction Corporation v. Nationsbank Corporation, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/25/02), , the Louisiana Supreme Court accepted the certified question from the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, as to whether the LCAS precludes all actions for damages arising from oral credit agreements, regardless *1228 of the legal theory of recovery.