Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Clark, 851 So. 2d 1055.

55 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Nicholas Cody Flanagan La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Scott Allen Cooper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Eric Wayne Lemay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State v. Clark, 02–1463 (La.6/27/03), [, cert.
State of Louisiana v. Marvin Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State v. Clark, 02–1463, p. 18 (La.6/27/03), State v. Frank, 99– 0553, p. 14 (La.1/17/01)
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Brennen D. Lark La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Charles McQuarter, III La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Ernesto Alonso-Llerena La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Derrick Ryan Small La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Frank Garcia La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana Versus Javontae D. Simmons AKA "Tae" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State v. Hust 214 So. 3d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Donte Reed 200 So. 3d 291 La. 2016
State v. Rumley 183 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Clark, 2002-1463, p. 18 (La.6/27/03), (“Thus, a defendant is not entitled to a jury entirely ignorant of his case and cannot prevail on a motion for change of venue merely, by showing a general level of public awareness about the crime.”); State v. Frank, 1999-0553, p. 14 (La.1/17/01), .
State of Louisiana v. Latracus Henry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Henry 178 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.6/27/03) , cert.
State v. Thompson 163 So. 3d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Magee, 11-0574 (La.9/28/12), , citing State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.6/27/03), , and State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.1/17/01), , as revised (Apr.
State v. Mark 146 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“Courts have traditionally upheld denials of motions for mistrial based on emotional outbursts when a defendant fails to show their influence upon the jury prejudiced his right to a fair trial.” State v. Clark, 02-1463, p. 32 (La.6/27/03), , 1079 n. 25.
State v. Licona 141 So. 3d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 12/27/12) ; , writ denied, 13-306 (La.6/21/13); , citing State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.6/27/03), , 1079 n. 25, cert.
State v. Cope 137 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Magee, supra; State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.6/27/03), ; cert, denied, 540 U.S. 1190 , 124 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Brian Segura La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
6/27/03), State v. Frank, 99- 0553, p. 14 (La.
State v. Segura 127 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Clark, 02-1463, p. 18 (La.6/27/03), ; State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 14 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Buckley 120 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Clark, 2002-1463, p. 17 (La.6/27/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Randall C. Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Thompson 111 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
(8) The court has no jurisdiction of the offense charged.” In State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.6/27/03), , cert.
State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Clark, 02-1463, p. 14 (La.6/27/03), (citing State v. Langley, 95-1489, p. 14 (La.4/3/02), ).
State v. Chairs 106 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.6/27/03), , 1079 n. 25, cert denied, 540 U.S. 1190 , 124 S.Ct.
State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
State v. Clark, 02-1463, p. 18 (La.6/27/03), ; State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 14 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Sparks 68 So. 3d 435 La. 2011
State v. Clark, 02-1463, p. 17 (La.6/27/03), cert.
State v. Wright 57 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Frank, supra; State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.06/27/03), .
State v. White 57 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
P. art. 622; State v. Clark, 2002-1463 (La.06/27/03), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Daniel L. Pegues La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Pegues 43 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
They also argued Defendant failed to prove the “utter corruption of his trial venue by media coverage.” In State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.6/27/03), , cert.
State v. Pugh 12 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
In State v. Clark, 2002-1463 (La.6/27/03), , cert.
State v. Warren 2 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.6/27/03), ; see also State v. Huls, 95-0541 (La.App.
State v. Logan 986 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Clark, 02-1463, p. 18 (La.6/27/03), , cert.
State v. Lee 976 So. 2d 109 La. 2008
Cf. State v. Clark, 02-1463, p. 36 (La.6/27/03), (court order for production of blood sample equivalent of proper search warrant, notwithstanding its name, when it was "issued with all of the safeguards that a warrant affords" and probable cause found).
State v. Rideout 968 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.6/27/03), ; State v. Gatch, 27,701 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Willard Brandenburg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Brandenburg 949 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
In State v. Clark, 02-1463, pp. 31-32 (La.6/27/03), , cert.
State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
Manning , XXXX-XXXX p. 13, 885 So.2d at 1065 ; citing State v. Clark, XXXX-XXXX p. 25 (La.6/27/03), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Larry Surratt and Cynthia Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Surratt 932 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Clark, 02-1463, pp. 31-32 (La.6/27/03), , cert.
State v. Wright 931 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
After a review of the record and comparison of the facts surrounding the questioning of the jury venire in this case with examples set forth in State v. Clark, XXXX-XXXX (La.06/27/03), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Paul Junius Felix La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Felix 918 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.6/27/03), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
App. 4 Cir. 1/22/03), ; State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.6/27/03), , cert.
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
See e.g., State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.6/27/03), (78 out of 124 (62% of the venire members) "responded they had some exposure" to the case); State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.1/17/01), (110 out of 113 (97% of the venire members) "had been exposed to some publicity surrounding the case"); [10] Hoffman, 768 So.2d at 555 (72 out of 90 "prospective juror
State v. Dooley 882 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
P. art. 622; State v. Clark, XXXX-XXXX (La.06/27/03), , cert.