Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Major, 898 So. 2d 548.

18 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Willie R. Sanders, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
3 Cir. 3/2/05), -51, this court explained: It is well-settled that “[a]n indigent person may not be incarcerated because he is unable to pay a fine which is part of his sentence.
State of Louisiana v. Aljermon Henderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 Cir. 3/2/05), -51, the court explained, “It is well-settled that ‘[a]n indigent person may not be incarcerated because he is unable to pay a fine which is part of his sentence.
State v. Travis 265 So. 3d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 3 Cir. 3/2/05), , 550, a case in which the court of appeal reversed the defendant's sentence after the district court had refused to impose the mandatory fine attached to cocaine possession charges.
State of Louisiana v. Megan E. Morales -Aka- Megan Elizabeth Morales La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 3/2/05) -51 (alteration in original), this court explained: It is well-settled that “[a]n indigent person may not be incarcerated because he is unable to pay a fine which is part of his sentence.
State v. Morales 221 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 3 Cir. 3/2/05), -51 (alteration in original), this court explained: It is well-settled that “[a]n indigent person may not be incarcerated because he is unable to pay a fine which is part of his sentence.
State of Louisiana v. Randall C. Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 3/2/05), : Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 581 states in part that: “Upon the expiration of the limitations established by this Chapter, the court shall, upon motion of the defendant, dismiss the indictment.
State v. Thompson 111 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 3/2/05), , 554: Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 581 states in part that: “Upon the expiration of the limitations established by this Chapter, the court shall, upon motion of the defendant, dismiss the indictment.
State of Louisiana v. Rudolph Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 3/2/05), writ denied, 05-1716 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Michael Wayne Belton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 3/2/05), -51, this court explained in pertinent part: It is well-settled that “[a]n indigent person may not be incarcerated because he is unable to pay a fine which is part of his sentence.
State of Louisiana v. Rendrick R. Duke La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 3/2/05), -51 writ denied, 05-1716 (La.
State v. Duke 84 So. 3d 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 3/2/05), , 550-51 writ denied, 05-1716 (La.2/10/06), , this court explained in pertinent part 2 : It is well-settled that “[a]n indigent person may not be incarcerated because he is unable to pay a fine which is part of his sentence.
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Neal Deville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 3/2/05), writ denied, 05-1716 (La.
State v. DEVILLE 74 So. 3d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 3/2/05) , , writ denied, 05-1716 (La.2/10/06), ; State v. Davis, 05-1629 (La.App.
State v. Dillon 72 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Clifford Gail Holloway, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 3/2/05) - 51, the court explained, in pertinent part: It is well-settled that “[a]n indigent person may not be incarcerated because he is unable to pay a fine which is part of his sentence.
State v. Holloway 47 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 3/2/05) -51 , the court explained, in pertinent part: It is well-settled that “[a]n indigent person may not be incarcerated because he is unable to pay a fine which is part of his sentence.
State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Rideau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Rideau 943 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006