Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cheairs v. State Ex Rel. DOTD, 861 So. 2d 536.

162 citing documents.

State v. Achelles 208 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
12/3/03), , and focused on the factors set forth therein in his reasons for allowing the expert testimony.
Sandalon Jacobs v. David Sampson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Jacobs v. Sampson 206 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Boudreaux v. Bollinger Shipyard 197 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
& Dev., 03-0680, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), .
State v. Hampton 183 So. 3d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
And Dev., 03-0680, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), .
Jewitt v. Alvarez 179 So. 3d 645 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
& Dev., 2003-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Pertuit v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2 170 So. 3d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
and Development, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
John Anthony Guidry v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
12/3/03), where it adopted the three-prong inquiry set forth in City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc., 158 F.3d 548, 562 (11th Cir. 1998), for determining whether expert testimony should be admitted: (1) [T]he expert is qualified to testify competently regarding the matters he intends to address; (2
Guidry v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc. 164 So. 3d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
& Dev., 03-680, p. 9 (La.12/3/03), , where it adopted the three-prong inquiry set forth in City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc., 158 F.3d 548, 562 (11th Cir. 1998), for determining whether expert testimony should be admitted: (1) [T]he expert is qualified to testify competently regarding the matters he intends to address; (2) the methodol
A.S. v. D.S. 165 So. 3d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
& Dev., 03-0680, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), .
State v. Farrier 162 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
& Dev., 03-0680, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), .
Gilchrist Construction Co. v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 166 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Department of Transportation and Development, 03-0680, pp. 9-10 (La.12/3/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the following three-part inquiry for determining whether it is proper to admit expert testimony under La.
Pratt v. Culpepper 162 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
& Dev., 2003-0680 (La.12/3/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court further specified that admission of expert testimony is proper only if all three of the following things are true: (1) the expert is qualified to testify competently regarding the matters he intends to address; (2) the methodology by which the expert reaches his conclusions is sufficientl
Jessica Dauzat v. Marcus Cooper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
12/3/03), Boudreaux v. 2 Wimberley, 02-1064 (La.App.
Normand v. Cox Communications Louisiana, LLC 167 So. 3d 156 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
and Development, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Maldonado v. Kiewit Louisiana Co. 152 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
and Development, 2003-0680 (La.12/3/03), -541 .
Maddox v. Bailey 146 So. 3d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
and Dev., 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), -41 .
Ladart v. Harahan Living Center, Inc. 142 So. 3d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Deborah Monk v. United Fire & Casualty Ins. Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Aymami v. St. Tammany Parish Hospital Service District No. 1 145 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
& Dev., 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Monk v. United Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 139 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
DOTD, 03-680 (La.12/3/03), .
Jones v. Black 145 So. 3d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Department of Transportation and Development, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the following three part inquiry For determining whether the admission of expert testimony is proper: 1.
State v. Francois 134 So. 3d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
& Dev., 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), -42 .
Marti Cochran v. Safeway Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
and Development, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03)
Cochran v. Safeway Insurance Co. 128 So. 3d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
and Development, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Roland Lee Lewis v. Proline Systems, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
and Development, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03)
Lewis v. Proline Systems, Inc. 117 So. 3d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
and Development, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Fanguy v. Lexington Insurance Co. 105 So. 3d 848 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
and Development, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03); .
Arceneaux v. Shaw Group, Inc. 103 So. 3d 1086 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
and Development, 2003-0680, p. 7 (La.12/3/03), .
Tommie M. Granger, M.D. v. Christus Health Central Louisiana D/B/A Christus St. Francis Cabrini Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Granger v. Christus Health Central Louisiana 97 So. 3d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
DOTD, 03-680 (La.12/3/03), .
John Benjamin, Sr. v. William Zeichner, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Benjamin v. Zeichner 94 So. 3d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
& Dev., 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
State v. Waldrop 93 So. 3d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
& Dev., 2003-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Glen Vitrano, Et Ux. v. Nellie Franks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Vitrano v. Franks 92 So. 3d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
DOTD, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Dwight Johnson v. Jonathan Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
12/3/03), (citing 3 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein’s Evidence ¶ 702[02] (1981).
Johnson v. Smith 86 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
and Dev., 03-680, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), (citing 3 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein’s Evidence ¶ 702[02] (1981)).
Donna D. Johnson, Et Ux. v. State of Louisiana, Dept. of Transportation & Development La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
In Cheairs v. State of Louisiana, DOTD, et al., 03-680, (La.12/3/03), -41(alteration in original) the Louisiana State Supreme Court set forth the standard for determining the admissibility of expert testimony: Admissibility of expert testimony in Louisiana is governed by La.Code of Evid.
Johnson v. State, Dept. of Transportation & Development 85 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In Cheairs v. State of Louisiana, DOTD, et al., 03-680, (La.12/3/03), -41 (alteration in original) the Louisiana State Supreme Court set forth the standard for determining the admissibility of expert testimony: Admissibility of expert testimony in Louisiana is governed by La.Code of Evid.
State v. Marlowe 81 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
& Dev., 03-0680, p. 5 (La.12/3/03), .
Dennis Garcia Et Ux v. Anthony D. Stalsby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Cheairs v. State, Department of Trasportation and Development, 03-680 (La.12/3/03), Menard v. Federated Mut.
Garcia v. Stalsby 78 So. 3d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Cheairs v. State, Department of Trasportation and Development, 03-680 (La.12/3/03), ; Menard v. Federated Mut.
Hooper v. Travelers Insurance Co. 74 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
and Dev., 2003-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Jouve v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 74 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
And Dev., 2003-0680, pp. 1-2 (La.12/3/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that Dau-bert addressed only the issue of the reliability of an expert’s methodology and not whether an expert possessed the proper qualifications to testify.
McGlothlin v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital 65 So. 3d 1218 La. 2011
& Dev., 03-680 (La.12/2/03), .
Ferrara v. Questar Exploration & Production Co. 70 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Cheairs v. State, 2003-0680 (La.12/3/03), ; Succession of Pardue, 40,177 (La.App.
Dixie Roofing and Sheet Metal Company, Inc. v. Anita Jean Holmes Reeves Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Johnson v. Morehouse General Hospital 63 So. 3d 87 La. 2011
& Dev., 03-681 (La.12/3/03), (cites omitted).
Jerry Wayne Benoit v. Turner Industries Group, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011