Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Green v. K-Mart Corp., 874 So. 2d 838.

112 citing documents.

Galyn and James Montgomery v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Montgomery v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 103 So. 3d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
2 Cir. 6/20/12), (citing Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), ).
Henderson v. Gregory 93 So. 3d 818 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), .
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Biscomb 94 So. 3d 193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Green v. KMart Corporation, 2003-2495 (La.5/25/04), ; Wilkerson v. Wilkerson, 42,324 (La.App.2d Cir.8/15/07), .
Dotie v. Safeway Insurance Co. of Louisiana 87 So. 3d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 2003-2495 (La.5/25/04)
Davis v. Foremost Dairies 58 So. 3d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), .
Tonya Lynn Boudreaux v. R. E. Heidt Construction Co., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Boudreaux v. State, DOTD 49 So. 3d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495 (La.5/25/04)
Shawn Shelton v. Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Shelton v. WAL-MART LOUISIANA, LLC 28 So. 3d 1241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), .
James Jason, III v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5/25/04), ] (citing Lirette, supra ).
Jason v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency 27 So. 3d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“A fact finder may accept or reject the opinion expressed by an expert, in whole or in part.” Green [v. K-Mart, 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), ] (citing Lirette, supra).
Owen v. Smith 16 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 2003-2495 (La.5/25/04)
Friedman v. Friedman 11 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 2007-1335, p. 28 (La.4/18/08), ; Green v. K-Mart Corporation, 2003-2495, p. 5 (La.5/25/04), .
Ursin v. New Orleans Aviation Board 3 So. 3d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), .
Colleen Wood v. American National Property & Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2007-2312 (La.7/1/08) (quoting Green v. K-Mart, 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), ).
Wood v. American National Property & Casualty Ins. Co. 1 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
al., 2007-2312 (La.7/1/08), ) (quoting Green v. K-Mart, 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), ).
Amy Brossett v. Melody Howard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Brossett v. Howard 998 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
[ Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495, p. 5 (La.5/25/04), .]
Explained Kramer v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. 999 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
As explained in Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), , a trier of fact may accept or reject an expert's opinion in whole or in part.
Explained Kent Louis Kramer, Jr. v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5/25/04), a trier of fact may accept or reject an expert’s opinion in whole or in part.
Harris v. Delta Development Partnership 994 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In a subsequent decision, Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495, p. 8 (La.5/25/04), , the Supreme Court found the jury "abused its discretion" in failing to award general damages while awarding "a substantial amount for past and future medical expenses," distinguishing Wainwright .
Succession of Merrick 989 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495, p. 5 (La.5/25/04), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated, “[c]redibility determinations are for the trier-of-fact, even as to the evaluation of expert testimony.” The Court further noted |fithat the trier-of-fact may accept or reject in whole or in part, an expert’s testimony.
Ryan v. Zurich American Ins. Co. 988 So. 2d 214 La. 2008
Plaintiff also cites Green v. K-Mart, 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), , for its assertion that de novo review is appropriate.
Porter v. MONROE HOUSING AUTHORITY 986 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Wainwright v. Fontenot, supra; Green v. K-Mart Corp., 2003-2495 (La.5/25/04), .
Carr v. UNITED HOMES, INC. 983 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Green v. K-Mart Corporation, 2003-2495 (La.5/25/04), .
Cynthia Carr v. Delta Homes, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Green v. K-Mart Corporation, 2003-2495 (La.5/25/04)
Mayfield v. Reed 981 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 2003-2495 (La.05/25/04), .
D'AMBROSIA v. Lang 985 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), .
Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co. 980 So. 2d 654 La. 2008
Green v. K-Mart Corporation, 03-2495, p. 5 (La.5/25/04), .
Dufrene v. Gautreau Family, LLC 980 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), .
Doe v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Bd. 978 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), -44 .
Morgan v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 978 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Green v. K-Mart Corporation, 03-2495, p. 5 (La.5/25/04), ; Barber Brothers Contracting Company v. Cuccia, 98-0675, p. 8 (La.App.
Fisher v. Batista 968 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Green v. K-Mart Corporation, 2003-2495 (La.5/25/04), .
Wilkerson v. Wilkerson 962 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495 (La.05/25/04), ; Marsh v. USAgencies Cas.
Marsh v. USAgencies Cas. Ins. Co. 957 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 2003-2495 (La.05/25/04), .
Tina Marie Gilchrist v. Charles King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Leighow v. Crump 960 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
In a subsequent decision, Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495, p. 8 (La.5/25/04), , the Supreme Court found the jury "abused its discretion" in failing to award general damages while awarding "a substantial amount for past and future medical expenses," distinguishing Wainwright .
Justin Boudreaux v. Chester Boudreaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Lewis v. State Farm Ins. Co. 946 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
See Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), .
Hymel v. HMO of Louisiana, Inc. 951 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 2003-2495 (La.5/25/04), .
Harrison v. Cooper 944 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495, p. 5 (La.5/25/04), .
Harvin v. ANPAC Louisiana Ins. Co. 944 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), .
Mel McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
5/25/04), the supreme court discussed the factfinder’s role in assessing future medical expenses: Credibility determinations are for the trier of fact, even as to the evaluation of expert witness testimony.
McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club 934 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In Green v. K-mart Corp., 03-2495, p. 5 (La.5/25/04), , the supreme court discussed the factfinder's role in assessing future medical expenses: Credibility determinations are for the trier of fact, even as to the evaluation of expert witness testimony.
Parker v. Robinson 925 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
In Green v. K-Mart Corp., 2003-2495 (La.5/25/04), , the Louisiana Supreme Court was again faced with a jury verdict awarding a plaintiff special damages but no general damages.
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Deangelo Tennors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
5/25/04), (alterations in original), the court in elaborating on the correctness of its interlocutory ruling on the dismissal of a juror, stated: While we find that our former ruling denying writs pertaining to juror Williams’ dismissal is conclusive, we elaborate on the reasons why we d
State v. Tennors 923 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
App. 3 Cir. 6/18/03), -21 , rev'd, in part, on other grounds, 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), (alterations in original), the court in elaborating on the correctness of its interlocutory ruling on the dismissal of a juror, stated: While we find that our former ruling denying writs pertaining to juror Williams' dismissal is conclusive, we elaborate on the reasons why we denied writs in the first instance.
Hamilton v. Winder 924 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 6/18/03) , , aff'd in part, rev'd in part on other grounds, 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), , the Third Circuit found no error in the dismissal of a juror who was fifty minutes late on the fourth day of trial.