DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ramey v. DeCaire, 869 So. 2d 114.

212 citing documents.

  • Hanson v. Steven Caruso, Willow Creek, L.L.C. 182 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    | JLaw and Argument In Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, pp. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), -19 , our supreme court discussed the peremptory exception of no cause of action and the scope of appellate review thereof as follows: ; ■ ...
  • State in the Interest of B.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3/19/04), -19 (citations omitted), stated the following: 22 A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory 23 exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the 24 plaintiff’s right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
  • Winstead v. Kenyon 182 So. 3d 1087 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Beebe v. Larche 184 So. 3d 729 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    *734 In Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the function of a peremptory exception of no cause of action and stated: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right .to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
  • McCarthy v. Evolution Petroleum Corp. 180 So. 3d 252 La. 2015
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • John C. McCarthy, Individually and as Trustee of the Kathleen McCarthy Balden Trust, and Majorie M. Moss v. … La. 2015
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
  • Denham Homes, LLC v. Teche Federal Bank 182 So. 3d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Richard L. Reynolds v. Robert J. Bordelon III, Robert J. Bordelon Jr., Usagencies Casualty Insurance Company, Automobile Club … La. 2015
    8 Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Becnel v. Advocare International, L.P. 167 So. 3d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.03/19/04); .
  • Wood v. Wood 165 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.2/22/07), , citing Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Draughn v. Thacker 165 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    art. 931; Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Latoya Castille, Individually v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • Castille v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Ins. Co. 150 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Scott Mahfouz v. Thomas D. Davenport, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • Mahfouz v. Davenport 149 So. 3d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    The burden of proof lies with the moving party, and the “pertinent question is whether, in the light most favorable to [the] plaintiff and with every doubt re- , solved in [the] plaintiffs behalf, the petition states any valid cause of action for relief.” Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 8 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Maw Enterprises, L.L.C. v. City of Marksville 149 So. 3d 210 La. 2014
    Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774, p. 4 (La.2/22/07), , citing Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • In Re: Angela Marie Costanza and Chasity Shanelle Brewer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 09-299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04)
  • Chinazo D. Okechukwu v. Vitalis Chukwudi Okechukwu La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3/19/04), -19, the supreme court explained: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiff’s right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
  • Okechukwu v. Okechukwu 139 So. 3d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    In Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, pp. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), -19 , the supreme court explained: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
  • Steve M. Marcantel v. Tricia Soileau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3/19/04), -19 (citations omitted), stated the following: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiff’s right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
  • Laureen Olson v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    art. 931; Ramey v. DeCaire, 2003-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04)
  • Olson v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co. 134 So. 3d 1276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    art. 931; Ramey v. DeCaire, 2003-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), .
  • McClain v. City of New Orleans 137 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See, e.g., Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Lemmon Law Firm, LLC v. School Board of the Parish of St. Charles 131 So. 3d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 8 (La.3/19/04), ; Taylor v. Leger Construction, L.L.C., 10-749, p. 3 (La.App.
  • Marti Elizabeth Simon v. Ronald Theriot, Sheriff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • Garland Miller v. Desoto Regional Health System La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • Miller v. Desoto Regional Health System 128 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
    1 J4LAW “In reviewing the judgment of the district court relating to an exception of no cause of action, appellate courts should conduct a de novo review because the exception raises a question of law and the lower court’s decision is based solely on the sufficiency of the petition.” Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, pp. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Simon v. Theriot 127 So. 3d 1057 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    LAW “In reviewing the judgment of the district court relating to an exception of no cause of action, appellate courts should conduct a de novo review because the exception raises a question of law and the lower court’s decision is based solely on the sufficiency of the petition.” Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, pp. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Stanley Savoie v. Calcasieu Parish Sheriff Office La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3/19/04), -19, our supreme court discussed the peremptory exception of no cause of action and the scope of appellate review thereof as follows: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiff‟s right to jud
  • Savoie v. Calcasieu Parish Sheriff's Office 124 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    LAW AND DISCUSSION In Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, pp. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), -19 , our supreme court discussed the peremptory exception of no cause of action and the scope of appellate review thereof as follows: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action ag
  • St. Landry Homestead Federal Savings Bank v. Hubert Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3/19/04), - 19, the supreme court stated the following regarding appellate review of an exception of no cause of action: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiff‟s right to judicially assert the acti
  • St. Landry Homestead Federal Savings Bank v. Vidrine 118 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Scope of Review In Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, pp. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), -19 , the supreme court stated the following regarding appellate review of an exception of no cause of action: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
  • Zeigler v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 118 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    (citing Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), ).
  • Gaudet v. Jefferson Parish 116 So. 3d 691 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • In re Interdiction of Coulon 116 So. 3d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 2003-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Donald Domingue v. Peggy Sue Wagner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3/19/04), –19 (citations omitted), stated the following: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiff’s right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
  • Blanchard v. Blanchard 112 So. 3d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Lexington Insurance Co. v. Tasch, Inc. 105 So. 3d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    art. 931; Ramey v. DeCaire, 2003-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Schnell v. Mendoza 105 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Southeastern Louisiana University v. Cook 104 So. 3d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Scheuermann v. Cadillac of Metairie, Inc. 97 So. 3d 423 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    art. 931; Ramey v. DeCaire, 2003-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Scranton v. Ashley Ann Energy, L.L.C. 91 So. 3d 1174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.03/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Nola 180 v. Treasure Chest Casino, LLC 91 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 4/26/11) , , citing, Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Credit v. Richland Parish School Board 85 So. 3d 669 La. 2012
    Infinity, 10-2264 at 9, 63 So.3d at *675 946 (citing Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), ; Jackson v. State ex rel.
  • Pinegrove Electrical Supply Co. v. Cat Key Construction, Inc. 88 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 2003-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Zeitoun v. City of New Orleans 81 So. 3d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Id., citing Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Mobile-One Auto Sound, Inc. v. Whitney National Bank 78 So. 3d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181, p. 15 (La.3/9/07), , citing Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 8 (La.3/19/04), -19 .
  • Timothy Hugh Queen v. O. S. Nugent La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • William H. Nungesser v. Michael B. Moreno La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3/19/04), -19, the court discussed the peremptory exception of no cause of action: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiff’s right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
  • Arc Industries, L.L.C. v. Nungesser 74 So. 3d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, pp. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), -19 , the court discussed the peremptory exception of no cause of action: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.