DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ramey v. DeCaire, 869 So. 2d 114.

212 citing documents.

  • Queen v. Nugent 74 So. 3d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    It requires a determination of “whether the law affords a remedy |2on the facts alleged in the pleading.” Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Nesbitt v. Nesbitt 79 So. 3d 347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Timothy Hugh Queen v. H. Gregory Tete, Senior Warden La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Tiffany Chaisson v. Trans Teche, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3/19/04), -19, the supreme court expounded on the criteria necessary for ruling on an exception of no cause of action: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiff’s right to judicially assert the action
  • Wood v. Omni Bancshares, Inc. 69 So. 3d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Carla Broussard-Scher v. Brian Christopher Legendre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Broussard-Scher v. Legendre 60 So. 3d 1290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, pp. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), -19 .
  • James Ronald Savoie v. Romel Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3/19/04), -19): 4 Although a copy of Plaintiffs’ memorandum in opposition to Mr. Regan’s exception of no cause of action is attached to Mr. Regan’s appellate brief, the record on appeal does not contain any memoranda in support of or in opposition to the exception.
  • Savoie v. Charles 55 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    DISCUSSION Our supreme court discussed the exception of no cause of action in Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, pp. 14-15 (La.3/9/07), -69 (quoting Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, pp. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), -19 ): Is A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
  • John Taylor, Et Ux. v. Leger Construction, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Taylor v. Leger Construction, LLC 52 So. 3d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    When used in this context, a cause of action “is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.” Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), (citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., ).
  • W.T.a, Individually and as Co-Administrator of the Estate of the Minor Child, A.J.A. v. M. Y. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3/19/04), -19 (citations omitted, emphasis added), opined: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiff’s right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
  • Scaglione v. Juneau 40 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
    “A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.” Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • DiLeo v. Hansen 45 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Phillips v. Gibbs 39 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Id., citing Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Palandro v. Board of Supervisors 38 So. 3d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 2003-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • State v. Property Seized From Terrance Martin 37 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • John Taylor, Et Ux. v. Leger Construction La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3/19/04), the supreme court stated: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiff's right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
  • Taylor v. Leger Construction, LLC 33 So. 3d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In Ramey v. DeCaire, 2003-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), , the supreme court stated: *438 A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
  • Lavelle W. Aycock v. Daniel Chicola La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Our Supreme Court, in Ramey v. DeCaire, 03- 1299, pp. 7-8 (3/19/04), -19 (citations omitted), stated the following: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiff’s right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
  • Aycock v. CHICOLA 27 So. 3d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Our Supreme Court, in Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, pp. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), -19 (citations omitted), stated the following: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.
  • Foti v. Holliday 27 So. 3d 813 La. 2009
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 09-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Scp Distributors, LLC. v. Jsb Northpark, LLC 24 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • 831 Bartholomew Investments-A, L.L.C. v. Margulis 20 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In Ramey v. DeCaire, 2003-1299, pp. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), -119 , the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the law regarding the peremptory exception of no cause of action as follows: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the def
  • Watkins v. Cheatham 19 So. 3d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In Ramey v. DeCaire, 2003-1299, pp. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), -119 , the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the law regarding the peremptory exception of no cause of action as follows: A cause of action, when used in the context of the peremptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the faction against the de
  • Trans Pacific Interactive, Inc. v. US Telemetry Corporation 9 So. 3d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • CITY OF DENHAM SPRINGS v. Perkins 10 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 2003-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Schmidt v. Schmidt 6 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Id., 2006-1181, p. 14-15 (La.3/9/07), -69 , citing Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), -119 .
  • Crutcher-Tufts Resources, Inc. v. Tufts 992 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Ramey v. Decaire, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/19/04), .
  • United Teachers of New Orleans v. State Board of Elementary & Secondary Education 985 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Utno v. State Bd. of Elemen. and SEC. Educ. 985 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Walton Construction Company, LLC v. GM HORNE & COMPANY, INC. 984 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Richard Hargett v. Estate of Daniel N. Hargett, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), -19.
  • Hargett v. ESTATE OF HARGETT 977 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), -19 .
  • Major v. Pointe Coupee Parish Police Jury 978 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Winder v. George 973 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • Fox v. City of Alexandria 971 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Ramey v. DeCaire, XXXX-XXXX, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Amy L. Fox v. City of Alexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 2003-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04)
  • Associated Concrete Contractors, Inc. v. the Landing, LLC 962 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    3/19/04), , and attending discussion.
  • Johnson v. State 965 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Ramey v. DeCaire, XXXX-XXXX, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Pinegar v. Harris 961 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light 951 So. 2d 1058 La. 2007
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), -19 .
  • Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP 950 So. 2d 641 La. 2007
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Walsh & Bailey v. Lofaso 938 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Bayou Lib. Ass'n v. St. Tammany Par. Coun. 938 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Kimberly Johnson v. City of Pineville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3/19/04), -19, the court discussed the peremptory exception of no cause of action.
  • Johnson v. City of Pineville 924 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    In Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, pp. 7-8 (La.3/19/04), -19 , the court discussed the peremptory exception of no cause of action.
  • Roberson v. Town of Pollock 915 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Ramey v. Decaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), .
  • Heather Roberson v. Town of Pollock La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Kirby v. Field 923 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), .