Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 879 So. 2d 1276.

49 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Derrick Jermaine Cotlong La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2026
7/6/04), (citation omitted).
State of Louisiana Versus Juan Canales La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Sean Patrick Greene La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Ron Cleon Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
one meaning, the statute “should be so interpreted as to be in harmony with, preserve, and effectuate the manifest intent of the legislature, and an interpretation should be avoided which would operate to defeat the purpose and object of the statute.” State v. Williams, 03-3514, p. 2 (La.12/13/04), see also State v. Brown, 03-2788, p. 6 (La.7/6/04), reh’g denied, 9/3/04; State v. Broussard, 213 La.
State of Louisiana v. Laurie Elkins Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
7/6/04), (quoting Perrin v. United States, 444 U.S. 37, 49 n.13, 100 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana Versus Jerman Neveaux La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Kirk Menard v. Targa Resources, L.L.C. La. 2023
7/6/04), “The rule of strict construction is not to be 7 The LWS provides whistleblower protections to all employees, not just environmental whistleblowers as in LEWS.
GANNETT RIVER STATES PUBLISHING CORPORATION D/B/A DAILY ADVERTISER VERSUS 15TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY DONALD D. LANDRY La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
7/6/04), -86 (citations omitted), our supreme court stated: The juvenile court movement began near the end of the nineteenth century because “reformers were appalled by adult procedures and 8 penalties, and by the fact that children could be given long prison
State v. Johnson 196 So. 3d 26 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Brown , 2003-2788 (La.7/6/04), , cert.
State v. Heard 215 So. 3d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
15:529.1 which has been found to be unconstitutional by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Brown, No. So.2d 1276 , (7/6/04)).
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Heard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
15:529.1 which has been found to be unconstitutional by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Brown, No. So.2d 1276, (7/6/04)).
State v. Broyard 183 So. 3d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 10/10/12), (quoting State v. Brown, 03-2788, p. 5 (La.7/6/04), ).
State v. Rainey 150 So. 3d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Id., citing State v. Brown, 03-2788, p. 5 (La.7/6/04), .
State in the Interest of K. L. A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State ex rel. K.L.A. 140 So. 3d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Brown, 03-2788, p. 6 (La.7/6/04), .
State v. Jones 125 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Although the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/06/04), , writ denied, 543 U.S. 826 , 125 S.Ct.
State v. Jones 123 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Although the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/06/04), , writ denied, 543 U.S. 826 , 125 S.Ct.
State v. Williams 101 So. 3d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“It is a well-established tenant of statutory construction that criminal statutes are subject to strict construction under the rule of lenity.” State v. Brown, 03-2788, p. 5 (La.7/6/04), .
State ex rel. B.T. 67 So. 3d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In reaching this conclusion, this Court cited the Louisiana Supreme Court case of State v. Brown, 2003-2788, p. 20 (La.7/6/04), , which stated that “[a] juvenile adjudication is not a conviction of any crime.” In this case, B.T.
State Ex Rel. Bt 67 So. 3d 693 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
In reaching this conclusion, this Court cited the Louisiana Supreme Court case of State v. Brown, 2003-2788, p. 20 (La.7/6/04), , which stated that "[a] juvenile adjudication is not a conviction of any crime."
State v. Tolbert 66 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and the Louisiana Supreme Court’s holding in State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), .
State v. Langley 61 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
338, 342 , See State v. Brown, 03-2788, pp. 5-6 (La.7/6/04), , quoting Perrin v. United States, 444 U.S. 37 , 49 n. 13, 100 S.Ct.
State v. Odoms 62 So. 3d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and the Louisiana Supreme Court’s ruling in State v. Brown, 2003-2788 (La.07/06/04), , mandate a finding that La.
State v. Landry 60 So. 3d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and the Louisiana Supreme Court’s ruling in State v. Brown, 2003-2788 (La.7/06/04), , mandate a finding that La.
State ex rel. of I.P. 53 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Accordingly, even though a juvenile system is civil in nature and a juvenile adjudication cannot be used to enhance a sentence for a felony committed as an adult, State v. Brown, 03-2788 (7/6/04), , the State asserts that a prior juvenile adjudication can be used as a basis for a subsequent juvenile adjudication because under La.Code Crim.
State v. White 44 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Defendant states that this is an issue that has not previously been presented to or ruled upon by a Louisiana appellate court; however, he asserts that his position is supported by the Louisiana Supreme Court case of State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), , cert.
State v. Watts 41 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
338, 342 , See State v. Brown, 03-2788, pp. 5-6 (La.7/6/04), , quoting Perrin v. United States, 444 U.S. 37 , 49 n. 13, 100 S.Ct.
State v. George 34 So. 3d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and the Louisiana Supreme Court’s ruling in State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.07/06/04), , mandate a finding that La.
State v. Jefferson 26 So. 3d 112 La. 2009
2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and this court in State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), .
State ex rel. A.J. 27 So. 3d 247 La. 2009
favorably and | )r,used it as part of its rationale for ruling in State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), , that juvenile adjudications cannot be used to enhance adult felony convictions pursuant to La.
In Re State Ex Rel. AJ 27 So. 3d 247 La. 2009
favorably and used it as part of its rationale for ruling in State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), , that juvenile adjudications cannot be used to enhance adult felony convictions pursuant to La.
State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
However, because the case he was relying on, State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), , cert, denied, 543 U.S. 1177 , 125 S.Ct.
State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
However, because the case he was relying on, State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), , cert.
State v. Armstard 991 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Shaw, supra , and citations therein; State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), , and citations therein.
State v. Fussell 974 So. 2d 1223 La. 2008
State v. Williams, 03-3514, p. 2 (La.12/13/04), ; see also State v. Brown, 03-2788, p. 6 (La.7/6/04), , reh'g denied, 9/3/04; State v. Broussard, 213 La.
State v. Gilson 973 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Gage 965 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), , [ cert.
State v. LONZO 960 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), , cert.
State v. Lande 934 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
[7] State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), , cert.
State v. Allen 934 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Brown, 2003-2788, p. 22 (La.7/6/04), , cert.
State v. Stanton 929 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and State v. Brown, 2003-2788 (La.7/6/04), , prohibit a trial court judge from considering a defendant's juvenile record when imposing a sentence.
State v. Lemon 923 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Defendant argues that his habitual offender finding is unconstitutional, because the state used his juvenile adjudication as a predicate offense, and the Louisiana Supreme Court has since held in State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), , cert.
State v. Brown 904 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), , cert.
State v. Richardson 896 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
As noted in State v. Brown, 2003-2788 (La.07/06/04), , cert.
State v. Hardeman 906 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), , petition for cert.
State v. Girod 892 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
1215 , 143 L.Ed.2d 311 (1999), the Louisiana Supreme Court noted in State v. *652 Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), , cert.
State v. Winn 890 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
1215 , 143 L.Ed.2d 311 (1999); United States v. Tighe, 266 F.3d 1187 (9th Cir.2001), as cited in State v. Brown, 2003-2788 (La.7/6/04), , cert.
State v. Williams 893 So. 2d 7 La. 2004
State v. Brown, 03-2788, p. 6 (La.7/6/04), , reh'g denied 9/3/04; Broussard, 34 So.2d at 884 .
State v. Brooks 889 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
1215 , 143 L.Ed.2d 311 (1999), the Louisiana Supreme Court noted in State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/6/04), , that prior convictions are recognized as a constitutionally permissible sentencing factor because: prior convictions have been, by their very nature, subject to the fundamental triumvirate of procedural protections intended to guarantee the reliability of criminal convictions: fair notice, reasonable doubt and the r