Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Landry, 871 So. 2d 1235.

88 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Gomila La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 3/31/04), ).
State of Louisiana v. Kanethra Burnett La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. William A. McDonough La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 3/31/04), ).
State of Louisiana v. Trae Williams La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 2/31/044), State v. Bonicard, 98-0665 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Sharonda S. Freeman La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Akeeley Keshawn Blade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
App. 4th Cir. 3/31/04), (La.
State of Louisiana v. Brandon R. Laurant La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
State v. Degregory 274 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 3/31/04), , 1239 ).
State v. Turner 259 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 3/31/04), , 1239 ).
State v. Bibbins 258 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 3/31/04), , 1238-39 : In a second-degree battery conviction, the State is required to prove the offender committed a battery without the consent of the victim and that he intentionally inflicted serious bodily injury.
State v. Doucette 243 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 3/31/04) , ] supra ; State v. Trepagnier , 97-2427 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Derrick Walker Stafford -Aka- Derrick Stafford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 3/31/04), see also State v. Bonicard, 98-0665, p.3 (La.App.
State v. Stafford 241 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 3/31/04), , 1239 ; see also State v. Bonicard , 98-0665, p.3 (La.App.
State v. Dickerson 218 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 4th Cir. 3/31/04), ; State v *640 Johnson, (La.
State v. Jones 214 So. 3d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4 Cir. 3/31/04), , we note that Mr. Jones attempted to kill two people in broad daylight with an assault rifle, with clear disregard for public safety and the lives of innocent bystanders.
State v. Dove 194 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Kisack 190 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
as well as the particular circumstances of the case, “keeping-in mind that maximum sentences should be reserved for the most egregious violators of the offense so charged.” State v. Landry, 03-1671, p. 8 (La.App, 4 Cir. 3/31/04), .
State v. Barbain 179 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Wilson 165 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Alverez 158 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Bowens 156 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 3/31/04), ; see also State v. Bonicard, 98-0665, 3 (La.App.
State v. Celestain 146 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4th Cir. 3/31/04) , the Court set forth a standard of review for excessive sentencing claims: La.
State v. Laneheart 135 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Thomas 136 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Norah 131 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hamdalla 126 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hollins 123 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 3/31/04), -40 , this Court set forth the standard for reviewing an excessive sentence claim: La.
State v. Peters 123 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Landry, supra [ (La.App.
State v. Santos-Castro 120 So. 3d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Mills 120 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Marcelin 116 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 3/31/04) , ]; State v. Trepagnier, 97-2427 (La.App.
State v. Veal 116 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Landry, supra [ (La.App.
State v. Slattery 116 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Tatten 116 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Brown 115 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Parker 112 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Brown 157 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir.'3/31/04), -1240 , this Court set forth the standard for reviewing an excessive sentence claim: La.
State v. Sipp 104 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Williams 101 So. 3d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 3/31/04) , -1240 .
State v. Boudreaux 98 So. 3d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Paul 90 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 (sentence is constitutionally excessive if it is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime and is nothing more than purposeless imposition of pain and suffering).
State v. Williams 85 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Landry, supra [ (La.App.
State v. Fontenot 87 So. 3d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
App. 4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 , citing State v. Johnson, 97-1906 pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
State v. Buckley 88 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 3/31/04) , -1240 .
State v. Robinson 81 So. 3d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 3/31/04), ; see also State v. Bonicard, 98-0665 (La.App.
State v. Lomax 81 So. 3d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 , this Court set forth the standard for reviewing an excessive sentence claim: La.
State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 3/31/04), ,] supra; State v. Trepagnier, 97-2427 (La.App.
State v. Ray 70 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4th Cir.3/31/04) , the Court set forth a standard of review for excessive sentencing claims: La.
State of Louisiana v. Dustin P. Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 3/31/04), the fourth circuit upheld a four- year sentence for a defendant convicted of committing second degree battery on another man in the parking lot of a bar, noting that although he was a first felony offender, the defendant had prior misdemeanor convictions and a history of losing control of himself.
State of Louisiana v. Dustin P. Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 3/31/04), the fourth circuit upheld a four- year sentence for a defendant convicted of committing second degree battery on another man in the parking lot of a bar, noting that although he was a first felony offender, the defendant had prior misdemeanor convictions and a history of losing control of himself.