Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Higgins, 898 So. 2d 1219.

210 citing documents.

State v. Law 189 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Higgins , 03-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Gibson 186 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980, p. 6 (La.4/1/05), .
State v. Wallace 185 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Rumley 183 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980, p. 17-18 (La.4/1/05), ; State v. Gordon, 2013-0495, p. 18 (La.App.
State v. Jones 182 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, pp.17-18 (La.4/1/05), ; State v. Gordon, 13-0495, p. 18 (La.App.
State v. Davis 176 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, pp. 17-18 (La.4/1/05), ; State v. Gordon, 13-0495, p. 18 (La.App.
State v. Alexander 182 So. 3d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Robinson 166 So. 3d 395 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Elkins, 48,972 (La.App.2d *401 Cir.04/09/14), , writ denied, 14-0992 (La.12/08/14), , citing State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.04/01/05), .
State of Louisiana v. Wayne G. Taylor A/K/A Wayne Taylor 166 So. 3d 988 La. 2015
State v. Griffin 169 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
art. 704; State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05); , cert.
State v. Nelson 169 So. 3d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
art. 704; State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05); , cert.
State v. McClure 169 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
art. 704; State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05); , cert.
State v. Gorman 166 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Berniard 163 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with the physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient to support a factual conclusion.” State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 6 (La.4/1/05), .
State v. Miller 160 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“[I]n the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with the physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient to support a factual conclusion.” State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 6 (La.4/1/05); .
State v. Wilson 167 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See, e.g., State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Lloyd 161 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Law In State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Tillery 167 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 5/12/09) ; , 714 writ denied, 09-1316 (La.3/5/10); ; State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05); , cert.
State v. Roe 151 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, pp. 17-18 (La.4/1/05), ().
State v. Porter 151 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with the physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient to support a factual conclusion.” *880 State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 6 (La.4/1/05), .
State v. Gordon 146 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980, pp. 17-18 (La.4/1/05)
State v. Wells 156 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“[I]n the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with the physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient to support a factual conclusion.” State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 6 (La.4/1/05), .
State v. Smith 141 So. 3d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 6 (La.4/1/05), .
State of Louisiana v. Tony Garnell Pennywell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Pennywell 139 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 18 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Elkins 138 So. 3d 769 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), ; State v. Singleton, supra.
State v. Ross 144 So. 3d 932 La. 2014
The adoption of the “compelling necessity” test has been indicated in State v. Lacaze, 2012-2131 (La.6/17/13), ; State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert, denied, 546 U.S. 883 , 126 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Pete La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
“The trier of fact makes credibility determinations and may, within the bounds of rationality, accept or reject the testimony of any witness[.]” State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 17 (La.4/1/05), cert.
State v. Pete 134 So. 3d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“The trier of fact makes credibility determinations and may, within the bounds of rationality, accept or reject the testimony of any witness[.]” State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 17 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Scott 136 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980, pp. 17-18 (La.4/1/05)
State v. Nellum 136 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, pp. 17-18 (La.4/1/05), ().
State v. Francois 134 So. 3d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Jackson 132 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), ; State v. Cunningham, 46,664 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
State v. Scott 131 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980, p. 17 (La.4/1/05), .
State v. Taylor 130 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, pp. 17-18 (La.4/1/05)
State v. Sellers 128 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), ; State v. Cunningham, 46,664 (La.App.
State v. Singleton 117 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), ; State v. Cunningham, supra.
State v. Lacaze 117 So. 3d 915 La. 2013
That is, “[h]e must show that, without the material, his case would be greatly prejudiced or that an injustice would be done.” State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 36 (La.4/1/05), (citing Trosclair, 443 So.2d at 1103 ; -29 (La.1982)).
State v. Jackson 112 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), ; State v. Cunningham, supra.
State v. Buhcannon 112 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 19 (La.4/1/05), .
State v. Boudoin 106 So. 3d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 5/12/09) , , 714 writ denied, 2009-1316 (La.3/5/10), ; and State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Clouatre 110 So. 3d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Davis 111 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Bradley 99 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 19 (La.4/1/05), , cert, denied, 546 U.S. 883 , 126 S.Ct.
State v. Waldrop 93 So. 3d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
It provides, “if scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.” State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. S. R. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. K.W. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Carlos Rios Cortes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cortes 84 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“The trier of fact makes credibility determinations and may, within the bounds of rationality, accept or reject the testimony of any witness[.]” State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 17 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Marlowe 81 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
It provides, “[i]f scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.” State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 33 (La.4/1/05), .