Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Higgins, 898 So. 2d 1219.

210 citing documents.

State v. Bryant 80 So. 3d 754 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.04/01/05), , cert.
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, pp. 30-31 (La.4/1/05), -39 ; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 6 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Brown 80 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 19 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Cunningham 77 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), .
State of Louisiana v. F. F. Q. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. F.F.Q. 73 So. 3d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“The trier of fact makes credibility determinations and may, within the bounds of rationality, accept or reject the testimony of any witness....” State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 17 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. FFQ 73 So. 3d 536 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 17 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. LeBlanc 76 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Higgins, 2003-1980, p. 1 (La.4/1/05), (‘‘[W]e reverse the defendant’s first degree murder conviction and death sentence, but find the record supports the conclusion that the defendant is guilty of second degree murder and remand the case to the trial court for entry of [sic] judgment of guilty of second degree murder and for resentencing....” (empha
State of Louisiana v. Shawn Shelton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Shelton 75 So. 3d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 17 (La.4/1/05), cert.
State of Louisiana v. Ron Stewart Martin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Martin 66 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“The trier of fact makes credibility determinations and may, within the bounds of rationality, accept or reject the testimony of any witness[.]” State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 17 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. R. K. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Brock Anthony Lafitte La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Lafitte 63 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“The trier of fact makes credibility determinations and may, within the bounds of rationality, accept or reject the testimony of any witness[.]” State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 17 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. R.K. 64 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“The trier of fact makes credibility determinations and may, within the bounds of rationality, accept or reject the testimony of any witness[.]” State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 17 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Damien Orbro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. ORBRO 64 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“The trier of fact makes credibility determinations and may, within the bounds of rationality, accept or reject the testimony of any witness[.]” State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 17 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Nicholas Courville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Lamonica 44 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05), cert.
State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Preston 40 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), which dictates that to affirm a conviction “the appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 6 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Castro 40 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Mazique 40 So. 3d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Freeman 34 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), .
State v. Brown 36 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 19 (La.4/1/05), -32 .
State v. Roundtree 41 So. 3d 512 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), .
State v. Honore 31 So. 3d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Keller 30 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See also State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 21 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Davy C. Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/16/08), State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 20-21 (La.4/1/05), cert.
State v. Harris 21 So. 3d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/16/08), ; State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 20-21 (La.4/1/05), , cert, denied, 546 U.S. 883 , 126 S.Ct.
State v. Grimes 16 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Lathers 15 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 19 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Ealy 12 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Higgins, 2003-1980 (La.4/1/05), .
State v. Mosley 13 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
in the form of an opinion or otherwise.” State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 33 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Thomas 7 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
P. art. 434; State v. Higgins, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Peppers 5 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Holmes 10 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. *279 12/16/08), ; State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 20-21 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Williams 3 So. 3d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, pp. 20-21 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, pp. 30-31 (La.4/1/05), ; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, pp. 7-8 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Shaw 987 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
See State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 18 (La.4/1/05), (discharge of the defendant is neither necessary nor proper when the evidence presented at trial does not support the verdict returned but does support a responsive verdict or lesser included grade of the offense, and La.Code Crim.
State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
In State v. Higgins, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Gutweiler 979 So. 2d 469 La. 2008
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 35 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Stovall 977 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
1279 , 167 L.Ed.2d 100 (2/20/07), citing State v. Higgins, XXXX-XXXX, p. 19 (La.4/1/05), -33 .
State v. Taylor 973 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
art. 434; State v. Higgins, 03-1980, p. 35 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Taylor 968 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Latin 960 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Higgins, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Batiste 958 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
See, State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
4/01/05), (citing Lucky, supra at 850-51 ).
State v. Bozeman 951 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Alternatively, the State argues that the Louisiana Supreme Court recently reaffirmed its position against the admissibility of expert eyewitness identification testimony in State v. Higgins, 03-1980 (La.4/1/05), , cert.