Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carter v. Haygood, 892 So. 2d 1261.

270 citing documents.

Nolan J. Benson, Sr. v. Abc Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05)
Allen v. State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections 107 So. 3d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Carter v. Haygood, 04-646 (La.1/19/05), .
Williams v. SIF Consultants of Louisiana, Inc. 103 So. 3d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Carter v. Haygood, 04-646 (La.1/19/05), .
Benson v. ABC Insurance Co. 106 So. 3d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), .
Williams v. Library 111 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Each situation allows the courts “to weigh the ‘equitable nature of the circumstances in each individual case’ to determine whether prescription will be tolled.” Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 12 (La.1/19/05), [quoting R.O.M., Mote, Glover v. Bridges: Prescription — Applicability of Contra Non Valentum Doctrine to Medical Malpractice Actions, 61 Tul.
Katherine Sepulvado v. Rebecca Procell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
1/19/05), (citations omitted).
Sepulvado v. Procell 99 So. 3d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Carter v. Haygood, 04-646, pp. 8-9 (La.1/19/05), (citations omitted).
Huddleston v. Huddleston 106 So. 3d 567 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Carter v. Haygood, 2004-0646 (La.1/19/05), ; Scranton, supra.
Flach v. Diebold, Inc. 99 So. 3d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Carter v. Haygood, 04-646, p. 11 (La.1/19/05), .
Northa Lee Holmes v. Triad Hospitality D/B/A Clarion Hotel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05)
Holmes v. Triad Hospitality 89 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Straub v. Richardson 92 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Carter v. Hay-good, 2004-0646, p. 8 (La.1/19/05), .
Gibsland Bank and Trust Company v. Kitchens Benton Kitchens & Black (Aplc) 85 So. 3d 688 La. 2012
See Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Smart v. Vazquez 85 So. 3d 686 La. 2012
See Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Smart v. Vazquez 85 So. 3d 689 La. 2012
See Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Henderson v. SNL Distribution Services, Inc. 89 So. 3d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 11, (citations omitted).
Wells v. Zadeck 89 So. 3d 1145 La. 2012
1 Each category allows the courts “to weigh the ‘equitable nature of the circumstances in each individual case’ to determine whether prescription will be tolled.” Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 12 (La.1/19/05), .
Patricia Ann Wherland, Et Ux. v. Carl P. Fastabend, M. D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
1/19/05), (citations omitted).
Wherland v. Fastabend 85 So. 3d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
However, if prescription is evident on the face of the pleadings, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show the action has not prescribed.” Carter v. Haygood, 04-646, pp. 8-9 (La.1/19/05), (citations omitted).
Kinder Gas, Inc. v. Gerald B. Reynolds La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
LAW AND DISCUSSION Exceptions of Prescription-Tort Claims When “evidence is introduced at the hearing on [a] peremptory exception of prescription, the [trial] court‟s findings of fact are reviewed under the manifest error-clearly wrong standard of review.” Carter v. Haygood, 04-646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05)
Kinder Gas, Inc. v. Reynolds 84 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
LAW AND DISCUSSION Exceptions of Prescription-Tort Claims When “evidence is introduced at the hearing on [a] peremptory exception of prescription, the [trial] court’s findings of fact are reviewed under the manifest error-clearly "wrong standard of review.” Carter v. Haygood, 04-646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), .
Jenkins v. Starns 85 So. 3d 612 La. 2012
04-0646, pp. 19-20 (La.1/19/05); .
City of Breaux Bridge v. Charles Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Barbe v. American Sugar Refining, Inc. 83 So. 3d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Homeowner's Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 2006-401, p. 4 (La.10/17/06), (citing Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), ).
Duckworth v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 78 So. 3d 835 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
Corp., 10-0105, p. 4 (La.3/15/11), ; Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), .
CHEF MENTEUR LAND CO., LTD. v. Sandrock 78 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Homeowner’s Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 2006-401, p. 4 (La.10/17/06), (citing Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), ).
Oracle Oil, LLC v. EPI Consultants 77 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Carter v. Haygood, 2004-0646, p. 11 (La.1/19/05), .
Bates v. City of Shreveport 69 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), ; McKinley v. Scott, supra.
Tommy McCain v. Joanna Cassidy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
McCain v. Cassidy 68 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
*634 PRESCRIPTION When “evidence is introduced at the hearing on [a] peremptory exception of prescription, the [trial] court’s findings of fact are reviewed under the manifest error-clearly wrong standard of review.” Carter v. Haygood, 04-646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), .
Barcia v. Louisiana Medical Malpractice Insurance Co. 67 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
However, as noted by the Supreme Court, in Carter v. Haygood, 2004-0646 (La.1/19/05), , [t]o soften the occasional harshness of prescriptive statutes, our courts have recognized a jurisprudential exception to prescription: contra non valentem non currit praescriptio, which means that prescription does not run against a person who could not bring his suit.
Judy Lyons v. Ann Knight La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
1/19/05), : 3 Ordinarily, the exceptor bears the burden of proof at the trial of the peremptory exception.
Lyons v. Knight 65 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The supreme court discussed the burden of proof for prescription claims in Carter v. Haygood, 04-646, pp. 8-9 (La.1/19/05), , 1267: |4Ordinarily, the exceptor bears the burden of proof at the trial of the peremptory exception.
Wells v. Zadeck 62 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 09-2368 (La.10/19/10), ; Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Taranto v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp. 62 So. 3d 721 La. 2011
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), .
Blake v. Maley 57 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 927(B); Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), ; Campo v. Correa, supra.
Kirk Richard v. Kimberly Babin Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Barnett v. Barnett 56 So. 3d 1044 La. 2010
Canter v. Haygood, 2004-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Mentz Construction Services, Inc. v. Poche 54 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 8 (La.1/19/05), .
TCC Contractors, Inc. v. Hospital Service District No. 3 of the Parish of Lafourche 52 So. 3d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), .
Ferrara v. Starmed Staffing, LP 50 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 3/11/08), ; see also Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), .
Eagle Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp. 47 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 8 (La.1/19/05), .
Eastin v. Entergy Corp. 42 So. 3d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc. 45 So. 3d 991 La. 2010
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), .
In Re Manus 40 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
Carter v. Haygood, 04-646, p. 11 (La.1/19/05), .
Bosarge v. DePaul/Tulane Behavioral Health Center 39 So. 3d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“[P]rescriptive statutes are strictly construed against prescription....” Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 10 (La.1/19/05), .
Armstrong v. Louisiana Federation of Teachers PEG/FUSE Organizing Project 36 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Carter v. Haygood, 2004-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Bennie L. Coker v. Town of Glenmora, Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Michael J. Munro, Sr. v. La Hoteliers, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Coker v. TOWN OF GLENMORA 37 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Carter v. Haygood, 04-646 (La.1/19/05), .