Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 929 So. 2d 1211.

214 citing documents.

  • LeCompte v. Continental Casualty Co. 224 So. 3d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Jefferson v. International Marine, LLC 224 So. 3d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Stonecipher v. Caddo Parish 219 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • Coleman v. Querbes Co. No. 1 218 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • Foster-Somerled Enterprises, LLC v. St. Paul's Episcopal Church 212 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • Louisiana Capital Assistance Center v. Dinvaut 207 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3/17/06), ; Krebs, Lasalle, Lemieux Consultants, Inc. v. G.E.C., Inc., 16-24 (La.App.
  • Jackson ex rel. Tyler v. Farquhar 207 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    03/17/06), ; Jackson v. Estate of Jones, 39,056 (La.App.
  • Huntsman International LLC v. Praxair, Inc. 201 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Carolina Biological Supply Co. v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board 202 So. 3d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Lusich v. Capital One, ACP, LLC 198 So. 3d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, 2005-0719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Krebs, Lasalle, Lemieux Consultants, Inc. v. G.E.C., Inc. 197 So. 3d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612 (La.03/17/16), ; See La.
  • Ledet ex rel. Ledet v. Robinson Helicopter Co. 195 So. 3d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    See Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Alan Byargeon v. Concordia Chamber of Commerce La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • Byargeon v. Concordia Chamber of Commerce, Inc. 188 So. 3d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Brown v. Brown 187 So. 3d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Accordingly, “[e]very reasonable ^interpretation must be accorded the language used in the petition in favor of maintaining its sufficiency and affording the plaintiff the opportunity of presenting evidence at trial.” Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 050719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), (citing Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 7 (La.1/28/03), ).
  • Goers v. Mayfield 195 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    Inc., 2005-0612 (La.3/17/06), ; Penton v. Castellano, 48,-433 (La.App.
  • Succession of Francis Stalter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • Succession of Stalter 182 So. 3d 1145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), .
  • LeBlanc v. Alfred 185 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Moses v. Moses 174 So. 3d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Accordingly, “[e]very reasonable interpretation must be accorded the language used in the petition in favor of maintaining its sufficiency and affording the plaintiff the opportunity of presenting evidence at trial.” Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 050719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), (citing Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 7 (La.1/28/03), ).
  • Hershberger v. LKM Chinese, L.L.C. 172 So. 3d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-719, p. 9 (La.3/17/06), ; Acorn Cmty.
  • Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University v. Bickham 163 So. 3d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    The Louisiana Supreme Court indicates that this exception is used to determine “whether plaintiff belongs to the class of persons to whom the law grants the cause of action asserted in the petition.” Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-0719, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), , citing Turner v. Busby, 03-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), .
  • Walton v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 162 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Busby, 03-3444 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections, 03-1615, (La.2/20/04), .
  • South Louisiana Ethanol L.L.C. v. CHS-SLE Land 161 So. 3d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See also Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Ruel v. Dalesandro 152 So. 3d 893 La. 2014
    -87 (La.1976); Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Bass Custom Signs, LLC v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04)
  • Bass Custom Signs, LLC v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government 149 So. 3d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), .
  • State v. Watson 151 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Eagle Pipe & Supply, supra; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
  • New Orleans Fire Fighters Pension & Relief Fund v. City of New Orleans 150 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, pp. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), -1217 .
  • Monroe Surgical Hospital, LLC v. St. Francis Medical Center, Inc. 147 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    art. 927; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Willis v. City of New Orleans 143 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    on of whether plaintiff belongs to the class of persons to whom the law grants the cause of action asserted in the petition” and explained that it “serves to question whether the plaintiff in the particular case is a member of the class of persons that has a legal interest in the subject matter of the litigation.” Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-0719, pp. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), , citing Turner v. Busby, 03-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), .
  • Tryon Eastwood, Et Ux. v. Niblett's Bluff Park Commission La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • Loughlin v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 144 So. 3d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Exceptions of No Cause of Action and No Right of Action In Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612 p. 6 (La.3/17/06), -1217 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that one of the primary differences of the two exceptions is “that the focus in an exception of no right of action is on whether the particular plaintiff has a right to bring the suit, while the focus in an exception of no cause of action is on whether the law 1 ^provide
  • Koussanta v. Dozier 142 So. 3d 202 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-719 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Rigaud v. DeRuise 141 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    “The exception is triable on the face of the petition and, for the purpose of determining the issues raised by the exception, the well-pleaded facts in the petition must be accepted as true.” Id; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, 2005-0719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Clulee v. St. Pierre 142 So. 3d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Susan Arnaud, Et Ux. v. Ronald Dies La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), - 416; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003- 1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04)
  • Arnaud v. Dies 153 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), .
  • Nellie Pierce v. Atlantic Richfield Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005–0612, p. 6–7 (La.3/17/06), Turner v. Busby, 2003–3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), – 416; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003– 1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04)
  • Pierce v. Atlantic Richfield Co. 161 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p, 4 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), .
  • McClain v. City of New Orleans 137 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, p. 11 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Marks v. Third District Volunteer Fire Department 131 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
    Id., citing Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612 (La.3/17/06), -7 .
  • Garland Miller v. Desoto Regional Health System La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • Miller v. Desoto Regional Health System 128 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
    Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719, p. 10 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Penton v. Castellano 127 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612 at pp. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), -7 .
  • Cupit v. City of New Orleans ex rel. Board of Zoning Adjustments 120 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612 (La.3/17/06), ; See also La.
  • Hurricane Fence Co. v. Jensen Metal Products, Inc. 119 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
    Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), -1217 .
  • Humble v. Pafford EMS 116 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc., supra; Hood, supra; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Lions Gate Films, Inc. v. Jonesfilm 113 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Hood v. Cotter, 2008-0215, p. 17 (La.12/2/08), ; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, 2005-0719, pp. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Perkins v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office 113 So. 3d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013