Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 929 So. 2d 1211.
-
McCarthy v. Evolution Petroleum Corp.
111 So. 3d 446
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Bogues, supra; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
-
State v. $144,320.00 Tina Beers
105 So. 3d 694
La. 2012
Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), (reviewing exception of no cause of action de novo because it h «raised a legal question).
-
Bougere v. Northrop Grumman Systems Corp.
105 So. 3d 862
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
-
Thibco Investments, LLC v. Robert Thibodeaux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3/17/06), Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.
-
2400 Canal, LLC v. Board of Supervisors
105 So. 3d 819
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The questioned posed by an exception of no cause of action is “whether the law |7provides a remedy against the particular defendant.” Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-0719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), -17 .
-
Thibco Investments, LLC v. Thibodeaux
102 So. 3d 1043
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Bushy, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Darnell Carter v. Steak House Steaks, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04)
-
Carter v. Steak House Steaks, Inc.
107 So. 3d 97
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), .
- Suzanna L. Cathey v. Melissa Lynn Ogea and John Brian Cathey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-
Cathey v. Ogea
98 So. 3d 953
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719, pp. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), -17 ).
-
Niemann v. Crosby Development Co.
92 So. 3d 1039
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612 (La.3/17/06), ; OXY USA, Inc. v. Quintana Production Co. 2011-0047 (La.App.
-
Williams v. Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.
96 So. 3d 1195
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), .
-
Paul Piazza & Son, Inc. v. Piazza
83 So. 3d 1066
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-719 (La.3/17/06), .
-
Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corporation
79 So. 3d 246
La. 2011
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), .
- Brielles Florist & Gifts, Inc. v. Trans Teche, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
-
Brielle's Florist & Gifts, Inc. v. Trans Tech, Inc.
74 So. 3d 833
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719, pp. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), -17 .
-
Jenkins v. Gray Insurance Co.
67 So. 3d 707
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612 (La.3/17/06), ; See also La.
-
Timothy Hugh Queen v. H. Gregory Tete, Senior Warden
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3/17/06), (emphasis added).
-
Yokum v. NICHOLAS S. KARNO II, INC.
66 So. 3d 1240
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
at pp. 3-4, 998 So.2d at 130 (citing Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-612, 2005-719, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), ).
-
First Bank and Trust v. Duwell
70 So. 3d 15
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
The Louisiana Supreme Court in Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-0719,4 p. 6 (La.3/17/06), , defined the function of that exception as “a determination of whether plaintiff belongs to the class of persons to whom the law grants the cause of action asserted in the petition” and explained that it “serves to question whether the plaintiff in the particular case is a member of the class of persons that ha
-
In Re Melancon
62 So. 3d 759
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-719, pp. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), -17 .
-
Southern Industrial Contractors, LLC v. Western Builders of Amarillo, Inc.
56 So. 3d 307
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau Inc., 2005-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
-
TCC Contractors, Inc. v. Hospital Service District No. 3 of the Parish of Lafourche
52 So. 3d 1103
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), -17 .
-
Wagoner v. CHEVRON USA INC.
55 So. 3d 12
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.03/17/06), ; Skannal v. Bamburg, 44,820 (La.App.2d Cir.01/27/10), , writ denied, 10-0707 (La.05/28/10), ; Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp., 09-0298 (La.App.
-
Del Dean David, Et Ux. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
In Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), -17, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated “the focus 10 in an exception of no cause of action is on whether the law provides a remedy against the particular defendant.” The inquiry is whether “the law extends a remedy against the defendant to anyone under the factual
-
Susan and Edward L. Wilhelm v. Mosaic Global Operations, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
In Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), -17, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated “the focus 10 in an exception of no cause of action is on whether the law provides a remedy against the particular defendant.” The inquiry is whether “the law extends a remedy against the defendant to anyone under the factual
-
David v. Velsicol Chem. Corp.
49 So. 3d 997
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), -17 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated “the focus hfin an exception of no cause of action is on whether the law provides a remedy against the particular defendant.” The inquiry is whether “the law extends a remedy against the defendant to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition.” 929 So.2d.
-
Eagle Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp.
47 So. 3d 428
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), .
-
Torbert Land Co., L.L.C. v. Montgomery
42 So. 3d 1132
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
-
Hospitality Consultants, LLC v. Angeron
41 So. 3d 1236
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“The function of an exception of no right of action is a determination of whether plaintiff belongs to a class of persons to whom the law grants the cause of action asserted in the petition.” Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), , rehearing denied, 6/23/06.
-
Ratliff v. LSU Board of Supervisors
38 So. 3d 1068
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
art. 927; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), (citation omitted).
- Scp Distributors, LLC. v. Jsb Northpark, LLC 24 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
Rome v. Bruce
27 So. 3d 885
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), .
- Sherar v. Besse 15 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
Roux v. Pflueger
16 So. 3d 590
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, pp. 8-9 (La.3/17/06), .
-
Florida Gas Transmission Co. v. Louisiana Tax Commission
10 So. 3d 1221
La. 2009
3/17/06), ; Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 98-0601 (La.
-
Florida Gas Transmission Co. v. Louisiana Tax Commission
10 So. 3d 1219
La. 2009
Farms v. Exxon Mobil Coup., 07-2371 (La.7/1/08), ; Carmena v. East Baton Rouge Sheriff’s Office, 06-2680 (La.2/2/07); ; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.3/17/06), ; Cat’s Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 98-0601 (La.10/20/98), ; La.
-
Brungardt v. Summitt
7 So. 3d 879
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Mr. Summit’s motion included Mrs. Brungardt’s deposition testimony and his own affidavit attesting that he is “not a rapist.” Her publication of this accusation, he stated under oath, “put a major strain on my marriage and the lives of our children, that almost destroyed our marriage.” In Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, pp. 8-9 (La.3/17/06), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the elements of the tort of defamation: Defamation is a tort involving an invasion of a person’
-
Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.
10 So. 3d 806
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), -17 .
-
Needom v. Robein
7 So. 3d 30
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, 2005-0719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), , citing Industrial Cos., Inc., v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), .
-
Barnes v. Barnes
8 So. 3d 628
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719 (La.3/17/06), .
-
Dural v. Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology
4 So. 3d 874
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), .
-
Bernberg v. Strauss
999 So. 2d 1184
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
In Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-719, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), -1217 , the Court discussed these two exceptions and stated that "one of the primary differences between the exception of no right of action and no cause of action lies in the *1187 fact that the focus in an exception of no right of action is on whether the particular plaintiff has a right to bring the suit, whil
-
Lutz Oil & Gas, LLC v. Pride Energy Co.
998 So. 2d 128
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), .
-
Anaya v. Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc.
985 So. 2d 281
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
See, e.g., Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), .
-
Ordoyne v. Ordoyne
982 So. 2d 899
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
See, e.g., Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), .
-
Sullivan v. Sullivan
976 So. 2d 329
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
-
Paul Nicholls Debaillon, Bankruptcy Trustee v. Consolidated Operating Co., Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3/17/06), : [A]n exception of no cause of action questions whether the law extends a remedy against the defendant to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition.
-
DeBaillon v. Consolidated Operating Co.
975 So. 2d 682
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
DISCUSSION The supreme court discussed appellate review of a judgment granting an exception of no cause of action in Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), , 1217: [A]n exception of no cause of action questions whether the law extends a remedy against the defendant to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition.
-
Waggoner v. AMERICA FIRST INSURANCE
975 So. 2d 110
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
See Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.03/17/06), .