Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 929 So. 2d 1211.

214 citing documents.

  • McCarthy v. Evolution Petroleum Corp. 111 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Bogues, supra; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
  • State v. $144,320.00 Tina Beers 105 So. 3d 694 La. 2012
    Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), (reviewing exception of no cause of action de novo because it h «raised a legal question).
  • Bougere v. Northrop Grumman Systems Corp. 105 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Thibco Investments, LLC v. Robert Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3/17/06), Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.
  • 2400 Canal, LLC v. Board of Supervisors 105 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    The questioned posed by an exception of no cause of action is “whether the law |7provides a remedy against the particular defendant.” Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-0719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), -17 .
  • Thibco Investments, LLC v. Thibodeaux 102 So. 3d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Bushy, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), .
  • Darnell Carter v. Steak House Steaks, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04)
  • Carter v. Steak House Steaks, Inc. 107 So. 3d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), .
  • Suzanna L. Cathey v. Melissa Lynn Ogea and John Brian Cathey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • Cathey v. Ogea 98 So. 3d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719, pp. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), -17 ).
  • Niemann v. Crosby Development Co. 92 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612 (La.3/17/06), ; OXY USA, Inc. v. Quintana Production Co. 2011-0047 (La.App.
  • Williams v. Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. 96 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Paul Piazza & Son, Inc. v. Piazza 83 So. 3d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-719 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corporation 79 So. 3d 246 La. 2011
    Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), .
  • Brielles Florist & Gifts, Inc. v. Trans Teche, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Brielle's Florist & Gifts, Inc. v. Trans Tech, Inc. 74 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719, pp. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), -17 .
  • Jenkins v. Gray Insurance Co. 67 So. 3d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612 (La.3/17/06), ; See also La.
  • Timothy Hugh Queen v. H. Gregory Tete, Senior Warden La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3/17/06), (emphasis added).
  • Yokum v. NICHOLAS S. KARNO II, INC. 66 So. 3d 1240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    at pp. 3-4, 998 So.2d at 130 (citing Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-612, 2005-719, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), ).
  • First Bank and Trust v. Duwell 70 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-0719,4 p. 6 (La.3/17/06), , defined the function of that exception as “a determination of whether plaintiff belongs to the class of persons to whom the law grants the cause of action asserted in the petition” and explained that it “serves to question whether the plaintiff in the particular case is a member of the class of persons that ha
  • In Re Melancon 62 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-719, pp. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), -17 .
  • Southern Industrial Contractors, LLC v. Western Builders of Amarillo, Inc. 56 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau Inc., 2005-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
  • TCC Contractors, Inc. v. Hospital Service District No. 3 of the Parish of Lafourche 52 So. 3d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), -17 .
  • Wagoner v. CHEVRON USA INC. 55 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.03/17/06), ; Skannal v. Bamburg, 44,820 (La.App.2d Cir.01/27/10), , writ denied, 10-0707 (La.05/28/10), ; Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp., 09-0298 (La.App.
  • Del Dean David, Et Ux. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    In Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), -17, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated “the focus 10 in an exception of no cause of action is on whether the law provides a remedy against the particular defendant.” The inquiry is whether “the law extends a remedy against the defendant to anyone under the factual
  • Susan and Edward L. Wilhelm v. Mosaic Global Operations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    In Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), -17, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated “the focus 10 in an exception of no cause of action is on whether the law provides a remedy against the particular defendant.” The inquiry is whether “the law extends a remedy against the defendant to anyone under the factual
  • David v. Velsicol Chem. Corp. 49 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), -17 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated “the focus hfin an exception of no cause of action is on whether the law provides a remedy against the particular defendant.” The inquiry is whether “the law extends a remedy against the defendant to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition.” 929 So.2d.
  • Eagle Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp. 47 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
    Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Torbert Land Co., L.L.C. v. Montgomery 42 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Hospitality Consultants, LLC v. Angeron 41 So. 3d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    “The function of an exception of no right of action is a determination of whether plaintiff belongs to a class of persons to whom the law grants the cause of action asserted in the petition.” Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), , rehearing denied, 6/23/06.
  • Ratliff v. LSU Board of Supervisors 38 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    art. 927; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), (citation omitted).
  • Scp Distributors, LLC. v. Jsb Northpark, LLC 24 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Rome v. Bruce 27 So. 3d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Sherar v. Besse 15 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Roux v. Pflueger 16 So. 3d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, pp. 8-9 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Florida Gas Transmission Co. v. Louisiana Tax Commission 10 So. 3d 1221 La. 2009
    3/17/06), ; Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 98-0601 (La.
  • Florida Gas Transmission Co. v. Louisiana Tax Commission 10 So. 3d 1219 La. 2009
    Farms v. Exxon Mobil Coup., 07-2371 (La.7/1/08), ; Carmena v. East Baton Rouge Sheriff’s Office, 06-2680 (La.2/2/07); ; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.3/17/06), ; Cat’s Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 98-0601 (La.10/20/98), ; La.
  • Brungardt v. Summitt 7 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Mr. Summit’s motion included Mrs. Brungardt’s deposition testimony and his own affidavit attesting that he is “not a rapist.” Her publication of this accusation, he stated under oath, “put a major strain on my marriage and the lives of our children, that almost destroyed our marriage.” In Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, pp. 8-9 (La.3/17/06), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the elements of the tort of defamation: Defamation is a tort involving an invasion of a person’
  • Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 10 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), -17 .
  • Needom v. Robein 7 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, 2005-0719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), , citing Industrial Cos., Inc., v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Barnes v. Barnes 8 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Dural v. Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology 4 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Bernberg v. Strauss 999 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    In Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-719, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), -1217 , the Court discussed these two exceptions and stated that "one of the primary differences between the exception of no right of action and no cause of action lies in the *1187 fact that the focus in an exception of no right of action is on whether the particular plaintiff has a right to bring the suit, whil
  • Lutz Oil & Gas, LLC v. Pride Energy Co. 998 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-612, 05-719, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Anaya v. Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc. 985 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    See, e.g., Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Ordoyne v. Ordoyne 982 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    See, e.g., Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Sullivan v. Sullivan 976 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.3/17/06), .
  • Paul Nicholls Debaillon, Bankruptcy Trustee v. Consolidated Operating Co., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3/17/06), : [A]n exception of no cause of action questions whether the law extends a remedy against the defendant to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition.
  • DeBaillon v. Consolidated Operating Co. 975 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    DISCUSSION The supreme court discussed appellate review of a judgment granting an exception of no cause of action in Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), , 1217: [A]n exception of no cause of action questions whether the law extends a remedy against the defendant to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition.
  • Waggoner v. AMERICA FIRST INSURANCE 975 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    See Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.03/17/06), .