Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Leard v. Schenker, 931 So. 2d 355.

39 citing documents.

William Hilton Broyles, III v. Chelsey Mixon Broyles La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
6/16/06), Fuller v. Fuller, 54098 (La.
Courtland James Normand v. Brittany Marie Rizzo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Randall K. Sturdivant La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Anthony E. Hill v. Christine Strickland La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
D. A. B. v. C. G. W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Tiffany Nielsen v. Nakia Nielsen La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
Shaquana Harvey, Individually and in Her Capacity as the Natural Tutrix of Jaden Harvey v. Eric Wayne Hamby, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Brian D. Doyal v. Hanna Doyal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
In Re: Dative Tutorship of The Minor Child Bailey Moore La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
6/16/06), Belcher v. Pace, 54,397 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jesse Lee Silas, II La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Jonathan Bergmann v. Trang Nguyen La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Kevin Belcher v. Kawanna Latrell Pace La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Billie Cook v. Sharon Sullivan La. 2021
Mark Fuller, III v. Tracy Landrum Fuller La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
6/16/06), Harrel v. Harrel, supra.
Nicholas William Hodgkin v. Whitney L. Hodgkin La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Benny Council v. Tameka Collins Livingston La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Matthew Smith v. Lauren Holloway La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
Thomas Lavigne v. Allied Shipyard, Inc., Ronald L. Callais, the Gray Insurance Company, Inc., D/B/A Gray & Company, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
6/16/06), Bush v. Winn-Dixie of La., Inc., -514 (La.
Alyson Mary Babcock v. Charles David Martin La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Braud v. Braud 261 So. 3d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Harrel v. Harrel 251 So. 3d 546 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Hiatt v. Duhe 238 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Mathes v. Faucheux 226 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State ex rel. Department of Children & Family Services, Child Support Enforcement ex rel. Bushman v. Knapp 216 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Jaligam v. Pochampally 206 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Leard v. Schenker 87 So. 3d 270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 3/22/06) , , rev'd in part by Leard v. Schenker, 06-1116 (La.6/16/06), ; and, Leard v. Schenker, 09-1438 (La.App.
Richard L. Gill v. Gabrielle A. Bennett & Laurie Bridges La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Gill v. Bennett 82 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Beard v. Schenker, 06-1116 (La.6/16/06), .
Patricia Leblanc v. Shawnee Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/16/06), citing AEB v. JBE, 99-2668 (La.
LeBlanc v. Guillory 38 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Leard v. Schenker, 06-1116 (La.6/16/06), , citing AEB v. JBE, 99-2668 (La.11/30/99), .
LEARD v. Schenker 35 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 3/22/06) , , reversed in part, 2006-1116 (La.6/16/06), .
Willhite v. Willhite 17 So. 3d 495 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Leard v. Schenker, 2006-1116 (La.6/16/06), ; Martin v. Dupont, 32,490 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Jermaine Perry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1st Cir. 6/16/06), citing Miramon v. Bradley, 96-1872, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Perry 9 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1st Cir.6/16/06), , citing Miramon v. Bradley, 96-1872, p. 6 (La.App.
Picou v. Picou 1 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 3/22/06) , , rev’d in part on other grounds, 06-1116 (La.6/16/06), ; citing Revision Comments — 1993 to La.Civ.Code.
Harris v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 997 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1st Cir.6/16/06), , citing Miramon v. Bradley, 96-1872, p. 6 (La.App.
Everhardt v. LOUISIANA DOTD 978 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
art. 103 (an error cannot be predicted upon a ruling that admits evidence unless a timely objection appears of record); Leard v. Schenker, 06-1116, p. 3 (La.6/16/06), ; Bush v. Winn-Dixie of La., Inc., -514 (La.App.
Lucinda E. Conner-Ellis v. Harvey Leo Ellis, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
6/16/06), the supreme court reiterated the long standing principle that custody and visitation matters are subject to an abuse of discretion standard of review: “The correct standard of review for the trial court judgment was the abuse of discretion standard.
CONNER-ELLIS v. Ellis 966 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
6/16/06), , the supreme court reiterated the long standing principle that custody and visitation matters are subject to an abuse of discretion standard of review: "The correct standard of review for the trial court judgment was the abuse of discretion standard.