DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 951 So. 2d 1058.

238 citing documents.

  • Schiff v. Pollard 177 So. 3d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 12 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Harbor v. Davie Shoring, Inc. 176 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), (citation omitted).
  • Lee v. McGovern 169 So. 3d 814 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Samaha v. Rau, supra; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Reynolds v. Bordelon 172 So. 3d 607 La. 2015
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337 p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424 p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
  • Richard L. Reynolds v. Robert J. Bordelon III, Robert J. Bordelon Jr., Usagencies Casualty Insurance Company, Automobile Club … La. 2015
    5 Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337 p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424 p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
  • The Bank of New York Mellon v. Whitney Blaine Smith, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337 p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424 p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
  • Bank of New York Mellon v. Smith 159 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337 p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424 p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
  • Keith William MacKmer v. the Estate of Frank Angelle, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04) ], Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Mackmer v. Estate of Angelle 155 So. 3d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07)], []; King v. Parish Na *129 tional Bank, [04-387 (La.10/19/04)], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04)], [.]
  • Davis v. Riverside Court Condominium Ass'n Phase II, Inc. 154 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    If the moving party has properly supported the motion for summary judgment, then “the failure of the non-moving party to produce evidence of material factual dispute mandates the granting of the motion.” Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), (quoting Babin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 00-0078, p. 4 (La.6/30/00), ).
  • Joseph Andrus Cormier, Sr., Et Ux. v. Coldwell Bankers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
  • Cormier v. Coldwell Banker 150 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003 — 1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
  • Camille Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3/9/07), (wherein the supreme court addressed a nullity action in the context of a party‟s alleged failure to disclose the existence of certain physical evidence.
  • Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc. 149 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See also Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 24 (La.3/9/07), (wherein the supreme court addressed a nullity action in the context of a party’s alleged failure to disclose the existence of certain physical evidence.
  • Schroeder v. Walgreens Family of Companies 150 So. 3d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1/19/11), (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), -70 ); see also, La.
  • Robert Chastant v. Laura Futral Chastant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07)], []; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04)], Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04)], [.]
  • Portillo v. Progressive Paloverde Insurance Co. 138 So. 3d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    “At that point, the party who bears the burden of persuasion at trial (usually the plaintiff) must come forth with evidence (affidavits or discovery responses) which demonstrates he or she will be able to meet the burden at trial.” Samaha, supra at 883 (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), -70 ).
  • Foster v. Patwardhan 132 So. 3d 495 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Samaha, supra; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 (La.03/09/07), .
  • Feingerts v. American Casualty Co. of Reading 132 So. 3d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 12 (La.3/9/07), [citations omitted].
  • Smith v. Treadaway 129 So. 3d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “[T]he failure of the non-moving party to produce evidence of a material factual dispute mandates the granting of the motion.” Schultz , 10-0343, p. 7, 57 So.3d at 1006 (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), -70 ); see also, La.
  • Valence v. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 128 So. 3d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    At that point, the party who bears the burden of persuasion at trial (usually the plaintiff) must come forth with evidence (affidavits or discovery responses) which demonstrates he or she will be able to meet the burden at trial.” Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Mark Savoy v. Adam T. Perry, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337 p. 7 (La.
  • Fair Farms, Inc. v. Holt 124 So. 3d 25 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Samaha v. Rau, supra; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Roland Robin v. Russell Hebert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • Robin v. Hebert 157 So. 3d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Todd v. Angel 114 So. 3d 512 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Samaha v. Rau, supra; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Markus Trautmann, Et Ux. v. Charles G. Fitzgerald La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), -70).
  • Fernen Louis Andrepont v. Chevron USA, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), -70).
  • Andrepont v. Chevron USA, Inc. 113 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), -70 ).
  • Trautmann v. Fitzgerald 113 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), -70 ).
  • Gabriel v. Tamimie 110 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    At that point, the party who bears the burden of persuasion at trial (usually the plaintiff) must come forth with evidence (affidavits or discovery responses) which demonstrates he or she will be able to meet the burden at trial.” Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), (emphasis added).
  • Rosaria D. Maya v. Priola Construction Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3/9/07), ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.
  • Bryan E. Mobley v. City of Deridder La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3/9/07)], []; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.
  • Midsouth Bank, Na v. Richard G. David La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • Mobley v. City of DeRidder 128 So. 3d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04) ], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Maya v. Priola Construction Corp. 128 So. 3d 1009 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07), ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04), ]; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04), .]
  • Midland Funding, LLC v. Cady 110 So. 3d 656 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 (La.3/9/07), ; Straughter v. Hodnett, 42,827 (La.App.
  • Roberts v. Marx 109 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Samaha, supra; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 04-0337 (La.10/19/04), .
  • John Paul Sapir, LLC v. Yum! Brands, Inc. 106 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    at pp. 6-7, 57 So.3d at 1006 (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), -70 ).
  • Leblanc v. 1555 Poydras Corp. 104 So. 3d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), -70 ).
  • Charles Cutler v. Beth McGee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), -70).
  • Cutler v. McGee 103 So. 3d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), -70 ).
  • Cypress Bend Investments, LLC v. Louisiana First Financial Group, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07)], []; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04)], Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04)], [.]
  • Billups v. B.C. Enterprise Group, Inc. 104 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    “At that point, the party who bears the burden of persuasion at trial (usually the plaintiff) must come forth with evidence (affidavits or discovery responses) which demonstrates he or she will be able to meet the burden at trial.” Samaha, 07-1726 at p. 4, 977 So.2d at 883 (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), -70 ).
  • Cypress Bend Investments, L.L.C. v. Louisiana First Financial Group, Inc. 105 So. 3d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04) ], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Catahoula Parish School Board v. Louisiana MacHinery Rentals, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3/9/07)], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.
  • Tracey D. Kulka v. Shag II, Inc. D/B/A the Bulldog Pool Hall" " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07)], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04)], Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04)], [.]
  • Catahoula Parish School Board v. Louisiana Machinery Rentals, LLC 105 So. 3d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07)], []; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04)], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04)], [.]
  • Kulka v. Shag 100 So. 3d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04) ], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Ann Anderson v. Rapides Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    “At that point, the party who bears the burden of persuasion at trial (usually the plaintiff) must come forth with evidence (affidavits or discovery responses) which demonstrates he or she will be able to meet the burden at trial.” Samaha, 07-1726 at p. 4, 977 So.2d at 883 (quoting Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 16 (La.3/9/07), -70).