DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite LOUTRE LAND AND TIMBER COMPANY v. Roberts, 994 So. 2d 535.

23 citing documents.

  • Derrick Alexander v. Government Employees Insurance La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    10/31/08), discussed the appellate standard of review for factual determinations as follows: The standard of appellate review of a trial court’s factual findings is well settled and has long been established in this state.
  • Calvin Joseph Guidry, Jr., Et Ux. v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    10/31/08), discussed the appellate standard of review for factual determinations as follows: The standard of appellate review of a trial court’s factual findings is well settled and has long been established in this state.
  • Guidry v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc. 203 So. 3d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 6/5/08), , writ denied, 08-1463 (La.10/31/08), , discussed the appellate standard of review for factual determinations as follows: The standard of appellate review of a trial court’s factual findings is well settled and has long been established in this state.
  • Joseph v. Netherlands Insurance Co. 187 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 6/5/08) , , writ denied, 08-1463 (La.10/31/08), , the appellate court found that an award of $10,000 for neck and back sprain where the neck sprain resolved itself after two years, but the plaintiff continued to suffer chronic lower back pain was inadequate and it raised the award to $30,000.00.
  • Calvin Joseph Guidry, Jr., Et Ux. v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    10/31/08), discussed the appellate standard of review for factual determinations as follows: The standard of appellate review of a trial court’s factual findings is well settled and has long been established in this state.
  • Guidry v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc. 191 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    6/5/08), , writ denied, 08-1463 (La.10/31/08), , discussed the appellate standard of review for factual determinations as follows: *5 ing of fact in the absence of “manifest error” or unless it is “clearly -wrong.” Our supreme court set forth a two-part test for the reversal of a factfinder’s determinations: (1) The appellate court must find from the record that a
  • Tiras Edwards v. Geico Indemnity Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • Edwards v. Geico Indemnity Co. 167 So. 3d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 6/5/08) , , writ denied, 08-1463 (La.10/31/08), .
  • Kristy Bailey v. David R. Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    10/31/08), discussed the standard of review for factual determinations as follows: The standard of appellate review of a trial court’s factual findings is well settled and has long been established in this state.
  • Bailey v. Leblanc 151 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 6/5/08), , writ denied, 08-1463 (La.10/31/08), , discussed the standard of review for factual determinations as follows: The standard of appellate review of a trial court’s factual findings is well settled and has long been established in this state.
  • Tracy Bowie v. Westside Habilitation Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    10/31/08), (citing Earls v. McDowell, 07-17 (La.App.
  • Bowie v. Westside Habilitation Center 150 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 6/05/08) , , unit denied, 08-1463 (La.10/31/08), (citing Earls v. McDowell, 07-17 (La.App.
  • Melissa Dore v. Mitsui Sumitomo Ins., USA, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    10/31/08), (citing Earls v. McDowell, 07-17 (La.App.
  • Dore v. Mitsui Sumitomo Ins., USA 117 So. 3d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 6/05/08), , writ denied, 08-1463 (La.10/31/08), (citing Earls v. McDowell, 07-17 (La.App.
  • Shenan Smith Purvis v. Grant Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    10/31/08), (citing Earls v. McDowell, 07-17 (La.App.
  • Tina Lynette Watkins, Indiv. v. Dr. Richard Barry, Louisiana Patients' Compensation Fund La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    10/31/08), (citing Earls v. McDowell, 07- 17 (La.App.
  • Jerrl L. Thompson v. Haralampos Rizos La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    10/31/08), (citing Earls v. McDowell, 07-17 (La.App.
  • Watkins v. Lake Charles Memorial Hospital 114 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 6/05/08) , , 312 writ denied, 08-1463 (La.10/31/08), (citing Earls v. McDowell, 07-17 (La.App.
  • Stoll v. Allstate Insurance Co. 95 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 6/5/08) , , writ denied, 08-1463 (La.10/31/08), , the appellate court found that an award of $10,000 for neck and back sprain where the neck sprain resolved itself after two years, but the plaintiff continued to suffer chronic lower back pain was inadequate and it raised the award to $30,000.00.
  • Loutre Land & Timber Co. v. Roberts 63 So. 3d 120 La. 2011
    2 Cir. 4/16/08), , unit denied, 08-1422 (La.10/31/08), .
  • Loutre Land and Timber Co. v. Roberts 47 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    In Loutre Land and Timber Co. v. Roberts, 42,918 (La.App.2d Cir.4/16/08), , writ denied, 08-1422 (La.10/31/08), (“hereinafter Loutre I”), this court held that genuine issues of material fact existed so as to preclude summary judgment.
  • Antonio Rogers D/B/A Custom Home Construction & Design v. Alecisa Mumford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Rogers v. Mumford 6 So. 3d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 6/5/08), , writ denied, 08-1463 (La.10/31/08), .