DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gathen v. Gathen, 66 So. 3d 1.

44 citing documents.

  • Gregory Ovide Versus Erica Rivers La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
    5/10/11), Duerson v. Duerson, 23- 311 (La.
  • Brandy Megan Broussard Wadsworth v. Christopher David Wadsworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    5/10/11), the supreme court was called upon to determine the appropriate standard of appellate review in a custody relocation case where the trial court did not give oral or written reasons for judgment: Based on our review of the law, we find that the trial court is not required to expressly analyze each factor in its ora
  • Ashley Hudson Murray v. Thaddeus Murray, Sr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
  • Carmelite Narcisse-Thomas v. Marc David Thomas La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
    5/10/11), (citing Curole v. Curole, 2002-1891, p. 5 (La.
  • Robert Bridges v. Katherine Laurel Bridges La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
  • Tameka Y. Simpson-Mitchell v. Danny R. Mitchell, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
    5/10/11), Langston v. Langston, supra.
  • Lisa Johanna Swenson Coulon v. Charles Joseph Coulon La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
  • Kyle Durand v. Kandy Rose La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
  • April Owens Dragon v. Brian Dragon La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
  • Eduardo Granados v. Jamie Lopez Granados La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
    5/10/11), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the trial court’s denial of a request to relocate a child is subject to abuse of discretion review.
  • Amanda Brasher Langston v. Gary Langston, II La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
  • Garrett Bass v. Christopher Sepulvado La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    5/10/11), (quoting La.Code Civ.P.
  • Maggye Rebecca Turner Winterer v. Seth Russell Winterer La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
    5/10/11), Curole v. Curole, 02-1891 (La.
  • George Wesley Higgins v. Sarah Beth Adams Higgins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    5/10/11), -8 (footnotes omitted), discussed the burden of proof applicable in relocation cases: In Curole v. Curole, 02-1891 (La.10/15/02), we first discussed the burden of proof in a relocation case.
  • Raymond Smith v. Holly Farish La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
  • Benny Council v. Tameka Collins Livingston La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
    5/10/11), (quoting 1 Frank L. Maraist, LOUISIANA CIVIL LAW TREATISE: CIVIL PROCEDURE, § 14:14 (2d ed. 2008)).
  • Amanda Lynn Mars v. Donald Ray Mars, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    5/ 10/ 11), - 9 n.4 ( quoting Frank L. Maraist, Louisiana Civil Law Treatise: Civil Procedure, Volume I, § 14: 14, 558 ( 2d ed. 2008)).
  • Keith Carranza v. Andrea C. Carranza La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    5/10/11), -8 (footnotes omitted), the supreme court discussed the burden of proof and the standard of review applicable in relocation cases: In Curole v. Curole, 02-1891 (La.10/15/02), we first discussed the burden of proof in a relocation case.
  • Wylie v. Wylie 273 So. 3d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    5/10/11), ; Curole, supra .
  • Danielle Ganaway v. Kyle Ganaway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • Ganaway v. Ganaway 238 So. 3d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • Mathes v. Faucheux 226 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Singleton v. Singleton 224 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • In re J.E.T. 211 So. 3d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Bailey v. Bailey 196 So. 3d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Gathen v. Gathen, 2010-2312 (La.5/10/11), .
  • State ex rel. Department of Social Services v. Whittington 193 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    |inAnd, while the statute provides that the trial court “shall consider” *1241 the factors, “the trial court is not required to expressly analyze each factor in its oral or written reasons for judgment in a relocation case.” Gathen v. Gathen, 2010-2812, p. 12 (La.5/10/11), ; see also, McLain, 2007-0762 at p. 17, 974 So.2d at 736 .
  • Bonnette v. Bonnette 185 So. 3d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    In determining the child’s best interest, the court shall consider the benefits which the child, will derive either directly or indirectly from an enhancement in the relocating parent’s general quality of life, LaGraize v. Filson, id.; see also, Gathen v. Gathen, 10-2312, p. 8 (La.5/10/11), .
  • LaGraize v. Filson 171 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Id.; see also, Gathen v. Gathen, 10-2312, p. 8 (La.5/10/11), .
  • Pollard v. Schiff 161 So. 3d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Further, the Louisiana Supreme Court, in a discussion of the applicable standard of review stated, “the trial court is not required to expressly analyze each factor in its oral or written reasons for judgment.” Gathen v. Gathen, 10-2312, p. 12 (La.5/10/11), .
  • Bush v. Bush 137 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Gathen v. Gathen, 2010-2312, p. 8 (La.5/10/11), .
  • Randazzo v. Prosperie 135 So. 3d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Hernandez v. Jenkins, 12-2756 (La.6/21/13), ; Gathen v. Gathen, 10-2312 (La.5/10/11), .
  • Foshee v. Foshee 123 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Further, the Louisiana Supreme Court in a discussion of the applicable standard of review stated, “the trial court is not required to expressly analyze each factor in its oral or written reasons for judgment.” Gathen v. Gathen, 10-2312, p. 12 (La.5/10/11), .
  • Poe v. Stone 118 So. 3d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    9:355.10; Gathen v. Gathen, 10-2312, p. 9 (La.5/10/11), .
  • Jaligam v. Pochampally 115 So. 3d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Additionally, “[i]n determining the child’s best interest, the court must consider the benefits which the child will derive either directly or indirectly from an enhancement in the relocating parent’s general quality of life.” Gathen v. Gathen, 10-2312, p. 10 (La.5/10/11), .
  • Moore v. Moore 111 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    9:355.13; Gathen v. Gathen, 2010-2312 (La.5/10/11), ; Payne v. Payne, 41,049 (La.
  • Atkins v. Atkins 106 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Gathen v. Gathen, 10-2312 (La.05/10/11), ; Curole, supra; Fuqua v. Fuqua, 46,118 (La.App.2d Cir.01/26/11), .
  • Quainoo v. Morelon-Quainoo 87 So. 3d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    LAW AND ANALYSIS In Gathen v. Gathen, 2010-2312 (La.5/10/11), , the Supreme Court explained that in relocation cases, La.
  • Arabie v. CITGO Petroleum Corp. 89 So. 3d 307 La. 2012
    We recently looked at a trial court’s failure to expressly analyze each factor contained in a statute, in terms of child relocation, in the case of Gathen v. Gathen, 10-2312 (La.5/10/11), .
  • Dawn Cheryl Peterson Perez v. Oscar Guevara Perez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    5/10/11), the supreme court stated, “La.
  • Perez v. Perez 85 So. 3d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In Gathen v. Gathen, 10-2312, p. 1 (La.5/10/11), , the supreme court stated, “La.
  • Benjamin Brian Hulshoff v. Jennifer Marie Hulshoff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Hulshoff v. Hulshoff 81 So. 3d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See Gathen v. Gathen, 10-2812 (La.5/10/11), .
  • Gray v. Gray 65 So. 3d 1247 La. 2011
    Gathen v. Gathen, 10-2312, p. 13 (La.5/10/2011), -10 .
  • Bonnecarrere v. Bonnecarrere 69 So. 3d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Cf. Gathen v. Gathen, 10-2312 (La.5/10/11), .