Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mazique, 51 So. 3d 19.

26 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Danny Trey Crossland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
    12/17/10), this court discussed ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to file a motion to reconsider sentence as follows: [W]hen the record contains sufficient evidence to address the ineffective assistance of counsel issue, this court examines “whether there was a reasonable probability that the tri
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael R. Suydam, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    12/17/10), this court discussed ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to file a motion to reconsider sentence as follows: [W]hen the record contains sufficient evidence to address the ineffective assistance of counsel issue, this court examines “whether there was a reasonable probability that the tri
  • State of Louisiana v. Donasty Anwanique Cohen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    5 Cir. 04/27/10), writ denied, 10-1198 (La.12/17/10)
  • State v. Cohen 272 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State v. Tutson 270 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    12/17/10), , this court discussed ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to file a motion to reconsider sentence as follows: [W]hen the record contains sufficient evidence to address the ineffective assistance of counsel issue, this court examines "whether there was a reasonable probability that the trial court would have
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Ja'rel Tutson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    12/17/10), this court discussed ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to file a motion to reconsider sentence as follows: [W]hen the record contains sufficient evidence to address the ineffective assistance of counsel issue, this court examines “whether there was a reasonable probability that
  • State v. Woods 263 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    12/17/10), ; State v. Grant , 04-341 (La.
  • State v. Perry 250 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Raye 230 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    12/17/10), (citing State v. Bolden, 03-0266 (La.
  • State v. Savage 218 So. 3d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    12/17/10), , the defendant argued on appeal that the trial court erred by denying his challenge for cause as to a prospective juror who, in a case based on charges of aggravated incest and pornography involving juveniles, could not be impartial because her daughter had been sexually molested as a child.
  • State of Louisiana v. Earnest G. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    12/17/10), (footnotes omitted), the fifth circuit noted: A prospective juror’s seemingly prejudicial response is not grounds for an automatic challenge for cause, and a district judge’s refusal to excuse him on the grounds of impartiality is not an abuse of discretion, if, after further questioni
  • State v. Hamilton 216 So. 3d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    12/17/10), , (footnotes omitted), the fifth circuit noted: A prospective juror’s seemingly prejudicial response is not grounds for an automatic challenge for cause, and a district judge’s refusal to excuse him on thfe grounds of impartiality is not an abuse of discretion, if, after further questioning, the potential juror demons
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher Lance Washburn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    12/17/10), the defendant argued that a computer forensic examiner who had found inappropriate photographs of a young girl on the defendant‟s cell phone should not have been qualified to testify as an expert witness, citing a lack of experience.
  • State v. Washburn 206 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    12/17/10), , the defendant argued that a computer forensic examiner who had found inappropriate photographs of a young girl on the defendant’s cell phone should not have been qualified to testify as an expert witness, citing a lack of experience.
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Mouton AKA Terrence Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Mouton 175 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    8 Cir. 5/5/10), , writ denied, 10-1195 (La.12/17/10), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Clerfy James Touchet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Bell, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    12/17/10), : To constitute an excessive sentence, this Court must find that the penalty is so grossly disproportionate to the severity of the crime as to shock our sense of justice or that the sentence makes no reasonable contribution to acceptable penal goals an
  • State v. Bell 91 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 5/5/10) , , writ denied, 10-1195 (La.12/17/10), : To constitute an excessive sentence, this Court must find that the penalty is so grossly disproportionate to the severity of the crime as to shock our sense of justice or that the sentence makes no reasonable contribution to acceptable penal goals and[,] therefore, is nothing more than the needless imposition of pai
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul B. Stephan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    12/17/10), we reviewed the law on this subject and stated: (emphasis added) When the defense counsel fails to file a motion to reconsider sentence, Defendant may have a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel when Defendant “can show a reasonable probability, but for defense counsel’s error, h
  • State v. Stephan 79 So. 3d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 5/5/10), -12 , writ denied, 10-1195 (La.12/17/10), , we reviewed the law on this subject and stated: (emphasis added) When the defense counsel fails to file a motion to reconsider sentence, Defendant may have a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel when Defendant “can show a reasonable probability, but for defense counsel’s error, his sentence tvould have been di
  • State v. Hernandez 82 So. 3d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 4/27/10), -36 , writ denied, 10-1198 (La.12/17/10), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Garry Wayne McClinton, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Adrian Harrison La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    12/17/10), involved an appeal by a defendant who had pled guilty to vehicular homicide; driving while intoxicated, first offense; careless operation of a motor vehicle; driving under suspension; and no seat belt.
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus W. Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Anderson 66 So. 3d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 5/5/10) , , writ denied, 10-1195 (La.12/17/10), .