Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Stewart, 78 So. 3d 140.

28 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Willie H. Battle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Desmyne Joseph Henry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    1/20/12), (quoting State v. Perry, 08-1304, p. 2 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. David Javon Arceneaux AKA David Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    1/20/12), (quoting State v. Perry, 08-1304, p. 2 (La.App.
  • State v. Lyles 263 So. 3d 930 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Dewayne Sylvester La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    1/20/ 12), the court determined that where the defendant had not objected to the error in the bill of information or to the amendment of it, and then proceeded to trial, the defendant did not successfully show that he was prejudiced by the error.
  • State v. Day 253 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    1/20/12), ; , 943-45 (La.
  • State v. Lambert 248 So. 3d 621 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    1/20/12), ; State v. Dove , 15-0783 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ali Lee Barconey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    1/20/12), (quoting State v. Perry, 08-1304 (La.App.
  • State v. Barconey 241 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    1/20/12), (quoting State v. Perry , 08-1304 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Timothy Eugene Dowden, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    1/20/12), (footnote omitted), this court held: However, there is no violation of Article 873 where there is an express or implied waiver of the delay.
  • State v. Dowden 224 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    1/20/12), (footnote omitted), this court held: However, there is no violation of Article.
  • State v. Foster 194 So. 3d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    5th Cir.5/10/11), , writ denied, 2011-1245 (La.1/20/12), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Kyle D. Hodde AKA - Kyle Daniel Hodde La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State of Louisiana v. Barry G. Roy AKA - Barry Roy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    1/20/12), (footnote omitted), this court held: However, there is no violation of Article 873 where there is an express or implied waiver of the delay.
  • State v. Roy 177 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 5/4/11), -78 , writ denied, 11-1660 (La.1/20/12), (footnote omitted), this court held: However, there is no violation of Article 873 where there is an express or implied waiver of the delay.
  • State v. Tillery 167 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 5/10/11) ; -84 , writ denied, 11-1245 (La.1/20/12); .
  • State of Louisiana v. Stephan M. Bergeron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    1/20/12), (footnote omitted) (alteration in original), this court held: 2 However, there is no violation of Article 873 where there is an express or implied waiver of the delay.
  • State v. Bergeron 150 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 5/4/11), , writ denied, 11-1660 (La.1/20/12), (footnote omitted) (alteration in original), this court held: IsHowever, there is no violation of Article 873 where there is an express or implied waiver of the delay.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jared J. Tidwell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Tidwell 139 So. 3d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 5/4/11) , , writ denied, 11-1660 (La.1/20/12), .
  • State v. Edgar 140 So. 3d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 6/22/11), , writ denied, 2011-1672 (La.1/20/12), (delay after denial of motion for new trial).
  • State v. Adams 119 So. 3d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 5/10/11) , -84 , writ denied, 11-1245 (La.1/20/12), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Randall C. Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Thompson 111 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 5/4/11) , , unit denied, 2011-1660 (La.1/20/12), .
  • State v. Holmes 106 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 5/10/11) , , writ denied, 11-1245 (La.1/20/12), .
  • State v. Taylor 97 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 5/10/11) , , writ denied, 11-1245 (La.1/20/12), .
  • State v. Scott 97 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 5/11/11), , writs denied, 11-1185 (La.11/23/11), and 11-1719 (La.1/20/12), , the Fourth Circuit found that the defendant was not entitled to a severance from his co-defendant in a second-degree murder prosecution where both defendants denied any involvement in the shooting, but neither blamed the other for the offense.
  • State v. Clarkson 86 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 5/4/11) , , writ denied, 11-1660 (La.1/20/12), .