Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tracie F. v. Francisco D., 188 So. 3d 231.

46 citing documents.

Gordon Charles Abboud v. Elizabeth Giambrone Abboud La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Gwendolyn Diamond v. Decarrious Byrcious Jenkins La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
3/15/16), 9 Such modification may be granted only if the petitioner shows: (1) there has been a material change in circumstances affecting the welfare of the child since the previous decree was entered; and (2) that the proposed modification is in the best interest of the child.
Dawson Jetton v. Tierny Jetton La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
3/15/16), Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.
D. A. B. v. C. G. W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
3/15/16), Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, 97-577 (La.
Obianuju T. Obi Versus Maduabuchi O. Onunkwo La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
3/15/16), -39; E. R. v. T. S., 18-286 (La.
Andrew Taylor Smith v. Angelica Harmon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3/15/16), ” Ferrand, 221 So.3d at 919.
Levi Austin Malone v. Brianne Leialoha Roberts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3/15/16), Harvey v. Harper, 22-744 (La.App.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of M.W. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
3/15/16), Ferrand v. Ferrand, 18-618 (La.
Faye Harvey & Nelford Harvey v. Laramie D. Harper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3/15/16), (emphasis added).
State of Louisiana Department of Children and Family Services O/B/O Amari and Armad Tassin Minor Children of Delisa … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Brendon Banks, Sr. Husband of/and Chalai' Banks v. Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company and Rlh Investments, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Carlo Carollo, Jr., And Frank Carollo, Individually La. 2022
3/15/16), (quoting Arabie v. CITGO Petroleum Corp., 10-2605, pp. 4-5 (La.
Criticized Karen Cohen Kinnett Versus Jarred Brandon Kinnett La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
3/15/16), citing Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248, 261, 103 S. Ct. 2985, 2993, 77 L. Ed. 2d 614 (1983), quoting Caban, 441 U.S., at 392, 99 S.Ct., at 1768.
Irrael Garcia Versus Jaidy Hernandez La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Andrew Taylor Smith v. Angelica Harmon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
3/15/16), the biological father sought to modify a stipulated judgment that awarded joint custody to him and to the child’s maternal grandmother.
Billie Cook v. Sharon Sullivan La. 2021
Gavin Morgan Versus Shanay Foster La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
In the Matter of the Custody of L.W.B. and M.N.B. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Benny Council v. Tameka Collins Livingston La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
3/15/16), 15 As this court has observed, “[t]he best interest of the child standard—codified in La.
Guidry v. Guidry 274 So. 3d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Bernard v. Allen 272 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3/15/16), , 239, citing LSA-C.C.
E. R. v. T. S. 256 So. 3d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In Re: L.M.M., Jr., a Minor La. 2018
3/15/16), wherein, in a dispute between two parties with shared custody arising from a consent decree, this court rejected a standard for showing a material change in circumstances that would have required a rehabilitated father to prove not only his rehabilitation, but also a material change in the stable environment in w
Ehlinger v. Ehlinger 251 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3/15/16), , 239-40 ; Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.
Phillip Vidrine v. Danielle Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Vidrine v. Vidrine 245 So. 3d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Richard Brandon Kyle v. Brittany Kay Kier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Burns v. Burns 236 So. 3d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3/15/16), , 239-40, and Evans, 708 So.2d at 738 , required him to prove only (1) a material change in circumstances since the previous custody decree, and (2) the modification is in the best interest of the child.
In re L.M.M. 230 So. 3d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3/15/16), ; Ferrand v. Ferrand, 16-7 (La.
Sherry Stewart v. Malrick Batts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
In Re: Eleanor Pierce (Marshall) Stevens Living Trust and Eleanor Pierce Stevens Revocable Gift Trust La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
In re Eleanor Pierce (Marshall) Stevens Living Trust 229 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Stewart v. Batts 229 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
In re Tedeton 243 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Dareth Champlin Delhoste v. Robin G. Delhoste La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3/15/16), -40 (quoting Evans, 708 So.2d at 738).
Delhoste v. Delhoste 222 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3/15/16), -40 (quoting Evans, 708 So.2d at 738 ).
Clarke v. Clarke 219 So. 3d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
L.J.D. v. M.V.S. 212 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Tinsley v. Tinsley 211 So. 3d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3/15/16), , 239-240 and Evans, 708 So.2d at 738 , claims that his burden of proof was to show (1) that there has been a material change in circumstances since the previous custody decree and (2) that the proposed modification was in the best interest of the child.
Daniel Prather v. Mercedes McLaughlin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3/15/16), stating, “we hold that the overarching inquiry in an action to change custody is ‘the best interest of the child.’” In Tracie F., 188 So.3d at 239-40, the supreme court further explained the burden of proof applicable to considered decrees and stipulated judgments, stating: This court has recog
Prather v. McLaughlin 207 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3/15/16), , stating, “we hold that the overarching inquiry in an action to change custody is ‘the best interest of the child.’ ” In Tracie F., 188 So.3d at 239-40 , the supreme court further explained the burden of proof applicable to considered decrees and stipulated judgments, stating: This court has recognized that diff
In re J.E.T. 211 So. 3d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3/15/16), , casts serious doubt on the viability or validity of that statement in Melancon.
Dazet v. Price 202 So. 3d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Ferrand v. Ferrand 221 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Ardoin v. Grice 190 So. 3d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
We are mindful that in Tracie F. v. Francisco D., 16-1812 (La.3/15/16), , the supreme court specifically held: For the reasons discussed in this opinion, we are especially guided by La.
Moody ex rel. Moody v. Murray 189 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Trade F. v. Francisco D., 2015-1812 (La.03/15/16), ; McCoy v. City of Shreveport, 49,428 (La.App.2d Cir.11/19/14, 6), , writ denied, 2014-2665 (La.03/13/15), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by