Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Perkins v. Buchler, 65 So. 2d 130.

22 citing documents.

Simon v. Knipmeyer 417 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
539 , ; Perkins et al. v. Buchler et al., 1953, , ; Succession of Bailey, 1957, 232 La.
Brunet v. Theriot 298 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Dupuy v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., ; Cush v. Griffin, La.App., ; Romero v. Galley, La.App., .
Mesh v. Duplantis 270 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Dupuy v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co., La.App., ; Cush v. Griffin, La.App., ; Romero v. Galley, La.App., 79 So.
Martin v. Farkas 241 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Cage v. McCraine 239 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Succession of Bailey, 232 La.
Wilson v. West 211 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Depuy v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co., La.App., ; Cush v. Griffin, La.App., ; Romero v. Galley, La.App., .” Having found that the sole proximate cause of the accident was the negligence of the plaintiff Wilson and that no recovery can be had by either plaintiff aga
Modern Appliance & Supply, Inc. v. Sapp 200 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
539 , ; , ; Rex Finance Company v. Morehead, La.App., ; Alice v. Woods, La.App., .
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Caldwell Bros. Real Estate, Inc. 169 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Therein we stated: “In this connection, it may be appropriate to observe that, under the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal of this State, Rule IX, Section 3, 8 LSA-R.S., one of the requirements as to a brief is that it contain ‘ * * * a specification of the alleged errors relied upon * * “For all practical purposes, , , relative to which the Supreme Court stated: “ ‘The appellants in the instant case have not pointed out any error in the judgment of the district court or filed any brief, and
Bader Finance Co. v. Asset 169 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
824 , ; , ; Dia-Log Company v. Pareti, La.App., ; Rex Finance Company v. Morehead, La.
State, Department of Highways v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 168 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
In this connection, it may be .appropriate to observe that, under the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal of this State, Rule IX, Section 3, 8 LSA-R.S., one •of the requirements as to a brief is that it contain “ * * * a specification of the .alleged errors relied upon * * For all practical purposes, , , relative to which the Supreme Court stated: “The appellants in the instant case have not pointed out any error in the judgment of the district court or filed .any brief, and have thus left to
Garrison v. Kuntz 166 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Chapman v. Lalumia 154 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Succession of Bailey, 232 La.
Reagan v. Mid-Continent Underwriters, Inc. 150 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
Dupuy v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co., La.App., ; Cush v. Griffin, La.App., ; Romero v. Galley, La.App., .
Dorsey v. Corrugated Asbestos Contractors, Inc. 147 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Succession of Bailey, 232 La.
F. A. B. Distributing Co. v. Marullo 138 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Dia-Log Co. v. Pareti 126 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Succession of Bailey, 232 La.
Fruge v. White 125 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Cush v. Griffin, La.App.
Rex Finance Co. v. Morehead 124 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
539 , ; Perkins et al. v. Buchler et al., 1953, , ; Succession of Bailey, 1957, 232 La.
Alice v. Woods 124 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1960
539 , ; Perkins et al. v. Buchler et al., 1953, , ; Succession of Bailey, 1957, 232 La.
Dupuy v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co. 113 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Cush v. Griffin, La.App.
Succession of Bailey 95 So. 2d 326 La. 1957
and authorities therein cited.
Delpit v. Delpit 94 So. 2d 660 La. 1957
and numerous authorities there cited.