Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 97 So. 2d 389.

110 citing documents.

Ja'Quarrius Ignont v. Rick Breen DBA Breen's Rapid Lube La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Genevieve Moore v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agriculture and Mechanical College O/B/O Lsu Health … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Temes v. Manitowoc Corp. 181 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wrap-On Co., supra at 876-877
Linnear v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY ENTEX/RELIANT 966 So. 2d 36 La. 2007
Co., , (1957); see also Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., (La.
Comeaux v. LAFAYETTE GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER 944 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Deedra Comeaux v. Lafayette General Medical Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Lawson v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America 938 So. 2d 35 La. 2006
[20] , (1957), this Court found: A determination of a proper instance for application of the principle of res ipsa loquitur has been the subject of volumes of discussion by learned jurists and legal scholars, who have been at pains to point out that the maxim means only that the facts of the occurrence warrant
Picou v. Equifax Services, Inc. 690 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Shahine v. State Univ. Med. Center 680 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Co., , (1957); Alexander v. St.
State Farm v. Wrap-On Co. 626 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
(1957) made the following analysis: "All that is meant by res ipsa loquitur is `that the circumstances involved in or connected with an accident are of such an unusual character as to justify, in the absence of other evidence bearing on the subject, the inference that the accident was due to the ne
LaCombe v. Dr. Walter Olin Moss Reg. Hosp. 617 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
721 , (1972) ]; Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., supra [ , (1957) ].
Viviano v. Arceneaux 572 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Lucas v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 562 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
721 , (1972)] supra; Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., [ , (1957)] supra.
Cangelosi v. OUR LADY OF LAKE REG. MED. CTR. 564 So. 2d 654 La. 1990
Hollier v. Lay Down Service, Inc. 554 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Co., , (1957): ‘ * * * the maxim [res ipsa loquitur] means only that the facts of the occurrence warrant the inference of negligence, not that they compel such an inference ...
Fox v. OUR LADY OF LOURDES REGIONAL MED. CTR. 550 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Fox v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center 550 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Montgomery v. Opelousas General Hosp. 540 So. 2d 312 La. 1989
Pace v. Loyal Order of Moose, Metairie Lodge 2195 538 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Co., , (1957): “* * * the maxim [res ipsa loquitur] means only that the facts of the occurrence warrant the inference of negligence, not that they compel such an inference ...
Montgomery v. Opelousas General Hosp. 529 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
The Louisiana Supreme Court, , (1957), explained: "...
Funez v. Jefferson Parish School Bd. 528 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Co., , -92 (1957), which states: "[T]he principle of res ipsa loquitur * * * means only that the facts of the occurrence warrant the inference of negligence, not that they compel such an inference; that the rule rests for its justification upon the common experience that accidents from such causes do not c
Hano v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT 523 So. 2d 861 La. 1988
Jones v. Levy 520 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Co., , -92 (1957), which states: "[T]he principle of res ipsa loquitur * * * means only that the facts of the occurrence warrant the inference of negligence, not that they compel such an inference; that the rule rests for its justification upon the common experience that accidents from such causes do not c
Bergeron v. Houma Hosp. Corp. 514 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
McCann v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 483 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Co., , (1957) has been used in numerous cases in determining whether the doctrine can be applied to a particular set of facts.
Kincade v. Doll 472 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Lemon v. Fein 467 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Morgan v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 456 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Co., , (1957); Alexander v. St.
Carriere v. Olivier 432 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Co., , (1957), recognized as a landmark case in this state on the subject or res ipsa loquitur, the Supreme Court stated: “....
Trichel v. Caire 427 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Riley v. McGee 427 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Co., , at 391: "A determination of a proper instance for application of the principle of res ipsa loquitur has been the subject of volumes of discussion by learned jurists and legal scholars, who have been at pains to point out that the maxim means only that the facts of the occurrence warrant the i
Rogers v. Brown 416 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Toussant v. Guice 414 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Holman v. Reliance Ins. Cos. 414 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Co., , (1957); Malone, Res Ipsa Loquitur and Proof by Inference, 4 La.L.
Zeno v. Lincoln General Hospital 404 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
White v. McCool 395 So. 2d 774 La. 1981
Benjamin v. United States Steel Corp. 396 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Co., , (1957); Malone, Res Ipsa Loquitur and Proof by Inference, 4 La.L.
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Saunders 394 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Co., , (1957); Malone, Res Ipsa Loquitur and Proof by Inference, 4 La.L.Rev.
Hebert v. Town of Ville Platte 373 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Co., , Langlinais v. Geophysical Service.
Pitre v. Bourgeois 371 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Holloway v. Southern Baptist Hospital 367 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Jenkins v. Ferguson 357 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Co., , (1957); Malone, Res Ipsa Loquitur and Proof by Inference, 4 La.L.Rev.
Lawyers Title Ins. Co. v. Carey Hodges & Associates, Inc. 358 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
(1957); Boudreaux v. American Insurance Company, 262 La.
Falcon v. Bigelow-Liptak Corp. 356 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Postlewaite v. Morales 352 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Percle v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 349 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Mirhosseiny v. Bd. of Sup'rs of La. S. Univ. 351 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Cranford v. Nelson & East Ford Co. 339 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
(1957); Bougon v. Traders & General Insurance Co., (La.App.
Cousins v. Henry 332 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Rothman 331 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
276 , ; , ; Boudreaux v. American Insurance Company , above.