Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Didier, 263 So. 2d 322.
-
State of Louisiana v. Skylar Frank
La. 2017
–76, –27 (1972), this Court determined that the legislature had codified the jurisprudential standard set forth in Roberts, supra, in La.C.Cr.P.
-
State of Louisiana v. Raymond Daniel Lowrey
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
So.2d 322 (1972); State v. 2 Bonfanti, 262 La.
-
State v. Lowrey
228 So. 3d 779
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
(1972); State v. Bonfanti, 262 La.
-
State v. Otkins-Victor
193 So. 3d 479
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
551 , (1956); , , 325 n. 4 (1972).
-
State v. Victor
195 So. 3d 128
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
551 , (1956); , , 325 n. 4 (1972).
- State of Louisiana Versus Errol Victor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
-
State of Louisiana v. Skylar Frank
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
rdict could have been rendered in the first trial as to the charge in the second trial; or (2) Based on a part of a continuous offense for which offense the defendant was in jeopardy in the first trial.” Louisiana uses both the “Blockburger test” and the “same evidence test.” So.2d 322 (1972)
- State v. Frank 192 So. 3d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State of Louisiana v. Isaac Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
- State v. Thomas 159 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- State of Louisiana v. Dana Bowles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
- State v. Bowles 123 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-
State v. Taylor
103 So. 3d 571
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
153 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Redfearn, 44,709, p. 19 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Letrakus Tyler AKA Trey Tyler
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
153, (1972); So.2d 322 (1972) ].
-
State v. Tyler
93 So. 3d 670
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
158 , (1972); , (1972)].
- State of Louisiana v. Christopher Sherman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- State v. Hall 85 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
-
State of Louisiana v. Marcus W. Anderson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Furthermore, the two charges are not based on the exact same conduct as was the case in [ (1972); (1972)].
-
State v. Anderson
66 So. 3d 568
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
153 , (1972); , (1972) ].
-
State v. Sims
7 So. 3d 1288
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Louisiana’s “same evidence” test is based upon whether the actual evidence introduced at the second trial would have supported conviction in |f,the first.
-
State of Louisiana v. Donald O'Conner
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
La.1980); So.2d 322 (1972) and
- State v. O'Connor 944 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
- State v. Duplechin 922 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
- State of Louisiana v. Donald Cogswell, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- State v. Cogswell 918 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- State v. Bates 859 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Harris 761 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Gaines 688 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
- State v. Woodberry 686 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
- State v. Ellis 657 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
- State v. Warner 653 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
-
State v. Girouard
615 So. 2d 29
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
[State v.] Didier, supra, [ , ] at page 327 [ (1972) ].
- State v. Head 598 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
- State v. Miller 571 So. 2d 603 La. 1990
- State v. Broussard 532 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
State v. Hargrove
522 So. 2d 1369
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
In his concurrence, Justice Lemmon favored the Blockburger test but determined it would not avail the defendant because the “gravamen [for both offenses] is the same,” , (1972).
- State v. Holmes 475 So. 2d 1057 La. 1985
- State v. Dubaz 468 So. 2d 554 La. 1985
- State v. Smith 461 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Defraites
449 So. 2d 540
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Louisiana's "same evidence" , (1972): As quoted with approval in the Official Revision Comment to Article 596, Louisiana has followed a form of the "same evidence" rule, which is stated in State v. Roberts, 152 La.
- State v. Vaughn 431 So. 2d 763 La. 1983
- State v. Fontenot 408 So. 2d 919 La. 1981
- State v. Comeaux 408 So. 2d 1099 La. 1981
-
State v. Knowles
392 So. 2d 651
La. 1980
(1972); State v. Bonfanti, 262 La.
- State v. Ponthier 391 So. 2d 1138 La. 1980
-
State v. Vincent
387 So. 2d 1097
La. 1980
(1972); State v. Bonfanti, 262 La.
- State v. Steele 387 So. 2d 1175 La. 1980
- State in Interest of Lewis 386 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
-
State v. Robertson
386 So. 2d 906
La. 1980
(1972); State v. Bonfanti, 262 La.
- State v. Solomon 379 So. 2d 1078 La. 1980