DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prieur, 277 So. 2d 126.

864 citing documents.

  • State v. Battie 735 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Lewis 736 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Hills 737 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Specifically, he argues the trial court erred in applying a lesser burden of proof than the "traditional" and its progeny when it ruled that the other crimes evidence was admissible under La.
  • State v. Arrington 738 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Meads 734 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Sims 734 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Consequently, the requirements, including limiting instructions to the jury, do not apply in the instant situation wherein proof of a prior conviction is a requisite element of the charged crime.
  • State v. Williams 735 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Hopson 735 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Johnson 735 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    The court then conducted a pre-trial hearing, (La.
  • State v. Haynes 729 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Buffington 731 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    [4] which has not been overruled by the enactment of La.
  • State v. Harge 730 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Jackson 734 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Johnson 728 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Reyes 726 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Cangelosi 722 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    IMPROPER ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE In his first assignment of error
  • State v. Koontz 722 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    In child abuse cases, evidence of sex crimes with a child other than the victim can be used to show motive, system, or opportunity and plan, are met.
  • State v. Martin 723 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Adkins 721 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    [2] The District Court ruled this testimony admissible in a
  • State v. Willis 721 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    [/It is well settled that before “other crimes” evidence can be admitted at trial, the state must: (1) (2) prove by a preponderance of the evidence evidence that the other bad act occurred and was committed by the defendant, (3) show that the evidence falls within one of the La.Code Evid.
  • State v. McArthur 719 So. 2d 1037 La. 1998
    Finally, the requirements *1040 must be met.
  • State v. Miller 718 So. 2d 960 La. 1998
  • State v. Guidroz 721 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    [4] for the admission of other crimes evidence, the state must provide written notice of its intent to use other acts or crimes evidence and describe these acts in sufficient detail within a reasonable time before trial.
  • State v. Matthews 720 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    On March 20, 1997, the district attorney filed a
  • State v. Colomb 720 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    The state contended this testimony was part of the res gestae of the crime
  • State v. Cooks 720 So. 2d 637 La. 1998
  • State v. Johnson 719 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    NOTES [1] The defendant does not complain that the State failed to comply with mandatory procedural safeguards before introducing "other crimes" evidence
  • State v. Butler 714 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    does not require a pretrial evidentiary hearing.
  • State v. Langley 711 So. 2d 651 La. 1998
  • State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
  • State v. Johnson 716 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Carter 713 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    The conditions for admissibility of "other crimes evidence" (1973).
  • State v. Dozier 713 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    However, in his brief, defense counsel asserts that he made a Motion for a Mistrial during the side bar based on the state's failure to give proper notice of other crimes evidence
  • State v. Connolly 707 So. 2d 1249 La. 1998
    4, the burden of proof required of the state in order to introduce evidence of other crimes has been reduced from “clear and convincing” to “sufficient evidence to support a finding by the jury that the defendant committed the act.” Louisiana Code of Evidence Article 1104, effective since August of 1994, provides: “The burden of proof in a shall be identical to the burden of proof required by Federal Rules of Evidence Article IV, Rule 404.” 1 The U.S. Supreme Court has addressed the burden of pr
  • State v. Evans 712 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    art. 720 the state filed a pre-trial notice of its intent to use evidence of other crimes.
  • State v. Sanders 717 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    Mr. Sanders argues that his Motion for New Trial was improperly denied considering the police officer testified to other crimes evidence, the threats and assault made on the arresting officer, and the prosecution referred to this evidence in its closing argument in violation of LSA-C.Cr.P.art.770.
  • State v. Lisotta 712 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    *530 the Louisiana Supreme Court set out the requirements for admission of such evidence.
  • State v. Johnson 706 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Arvie 709 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    3031 , 120 L.Ed.2d 901 (1992)
  • State v. Winn 705 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Miller 704 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Additionally, must show that the other acts satisfy one of the requirements listed in La.
  • State v. Richardson 703 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Mattox 704 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Nicholson 703 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    the procedure to be followed (formerly under La.
  • State v. Cotton 703 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    art. 1104 provides that the burden of proof in a shall be identical to the burden of proof required by Federal Rules of Evidence Article IV, Rule 404.
  • State v. Wilkerson 704 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    because it was too remote in time and not similar to the charged offense.
  • State v. Lagrange 702 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Van Winkle 701 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    (State Exhibit 48) To fully review defendant's argument we must consider a pre-trial motion filed by the state seeking to admit evidence of prior crimes in accordance with State v. Prieur, *1078
  • State v. Pardon 703 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    The defendant argues she was denied a fair trial because she was not given written notice within a reasonable time prior to trial and because she was not afforded a
  • State v. Schmidt 699 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997