DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prieur, 277 So. 2d 126.

864 citing documents.

  • State v. Reeder 698 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    art. 404(B), and its progeny.
  • State v. Pooler 696 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    r 10, we initially note that the only argument the defendant presents in brief to support his contention is the statement that, prior to using other crimes evidence, the state must provide advance notice to defendant of its proposed use, specify the purpose for which it is being offered, and demonstrate the ability to prove the other crime by clear and convincing evidence
  • State v. Bryant 694 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Williams 693 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    : "* * * the natural and inevitable tendency of the tribunal—whether judge or jury—is to give excessive weight to the vicious record of crime thus exhibited, and either to allow it to bear too strongly on the present charge, or to take the proof of it as justifying a condemnation irrespective of guilt of
  • State v. Whins 692 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    WHINS'S ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR In his sole assignment of error, Whins complains that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a
  • State v. Ledet 692 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    the court set forth five prerequisites for admission of other crimes evidence: the state must give timely notice of the other crimes evidence it intends to introduce, it must state the grounds for relevancy or admissibility of the evidence, the probative value of the evidence must outweigh any prejudicial e
  • State v. Eisbruckner 688 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    14 and Art. 404B, the basic criteria for introduction of evidence of other crimes, as correctly stated by the trial judge, is (1) the evidence is not merely repetitive and cumulative, (2) the evidence is introduced for a relevant purpose and is not a subterfuge for depicting the defendant’s bad character and (
  • State v. Lewis 687 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    On June 17, 1993, the state filed a with an incorporated memorandum in support.
  • State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Milligan 685 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Hampton 687 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    See, United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1348-49 (9th Cir.1977) cert denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct.
  • State v. Stepp 686 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    For evidence of other crimes to be admissible, prove with clear and convincing evidence that the other acts or crimes occurred and were committed by the defendant, demonstrate that the other acts satisfy one of the requirements listed in Art. 404B(1), and show that the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect.
  • State v. Clark 687 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Barnes 685 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Joseph 685 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    Defendant also argues that there was no hearing, to determine whether the other crimes evidence would have been admissible.
  • State v. Foret 685 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    On April 29, 1994, the state, filed its notice of intent to use evidence of other crimes.
  • State v. Campbell 683 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Before “other crimes” evidence can be admitted at trial, the state must: (1) (2) prove by clear and convincing evidence that the other bad act occurred and was committed by the defendant, (3) show that the evidence falls within one of the La.Code Evid.
  • State v. Powell 683 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    Bourque, 622 So.2d at 233 ; Hamilton, 478 So.2d at 129
  • State v. Pittman 683 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    art. 720 the State filed a pre-trial notice of its intent to use evidence of other crimes.
  • State v. Allen 677 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Jones 677 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    The trial judge allowed the State to offer evidence, (La.
  • State v. Wilson 677 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Coleman 673 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    In his second assignment of error, that the defendant had previously fondled S.R. on several occasions.
  • State v. Williams 672 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Robertson 672 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Specifically, and, therefore, he suffered prejudice.
  • State v. Crawford 672 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    By this assignment, (La.
  • State v. Reddick 670 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Hampton 670 So. 2d 1349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Sterling 670 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Broussard 664 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Davis 664 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    art. 404(B); State v. Broussard, 95-792 (La.
  • State v. Johnson 664 So. 2d 94 La. 1995
  • State v. Livings 664 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    art. 483 for the proposition that evidence of other crimes is inadmissible.
  • State v. Allen 663 So. 2d 686 La. 1995
    for introducing other crimes evidence.
  • State v. Williams 660 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Bailey 664 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    in *676 its notification to the defendant.
  • State v. George 661 So. 2d 975 La. 1995
  • State v. Boudreaux 662 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Bordenave 660 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Williams 658 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    He further argues that because the testimony was used to prove his intent or motive
  • State v. Scales 655 So. 2d 1326 La. 1995
    Article 404(B) and its progeny.
  • State v. Matthews 654 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    The defendant asserts that his conviction should be reversed because admission of the testimony concerning the fact that cocaine and marijuana were found in the apartment at 1534
  • State v. Beason 653 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    the trial court held a hearing and ruled that the portion of the statement concerning the smoking of marijuana would not be admitted.
  • State v. Pratt 653 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    Pratt contends that these references to his involvement in other crimes were inadmissible pursuant to LCE Art. 404 and entitled him to a mandatory mistrial pursuant to CCrP Art. 770(2).
  • State v. Ham 652 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    The first notice states: "In accordance with the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 720, (1973), [1170] (1979), you are hereby notified that the State of Louisiana intends to use evidence of other crimes committed by the defendant at the defendant's trial.
  • State v. Vale 650 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    She also complains that because she was not given notice of this “other crimes” evidence by the state prior to trial, the admission of the six packets was reversible error.
  • State v. Wright 650 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Mamon 648 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    Admission of this evidence requires that the state: (1) (2) prove by clear and convincing evidence that the other act occurred and was committed by the defendant; (3) show that the evidence falls within one of the La.C.E.
  • State v. Allen 647 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    a pretrial hearing must be held at which the state is required to: (1) show the evidence serves the actual purpose for which it is offered and (2) prove by clear and convincing evidence this defendant committed the other crimes.
  • State v. Sanders 648 So. 2d 1272 La. 1994
    Specifically, he claims that the court should not have admitted testimony of Kelly's sister, Angela Knight, because the state did not provide adequate notice to the defense of its intent to do so