DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prieur, 277 So. 2d 126.

864 citing documents.

  • State v. Taylor 508 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    e trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for a mistrial after the victim testified that some months prior to the date of the burglary and rape, defendant had been at her house and “couldn’t keep his hands off of me.” Defendant asserts that this was an improper reference to other crimes evidence, and LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Foster 510 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Hebert 507 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Comment, Other Crimes Evidence in Louisiana, 33 La.L.Rev.
  • State v. Cowans 503 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Landry 502 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. O'NEAL 501 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Charles 502 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    evidence of crimes related to the offense with which a defendant is charged is inadmissible except under special exceptions.
  • State v. Boudreaux 503 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Comment, Other Crimes Evidence in Louisiana, 33 La.L.Rev.
  • State v. Perry 502 So. 2d 543 La. 1986
  • State v. Guidroz 498 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    Thus, contrary to defendant's assertions in brief, (La.
  • State v. Moore 498 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    Aside from related offenses admissible as part of res gestae, and convictions admissible for impeachment purposes, Louisiana's statutes provide for only three exceptions to the general rule of inadmissibility-acts relevant to show intent, knowledge, or system
  • State v. Farmer 497 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Stringer 496 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Olsen 496 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Johnson 496 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Obran 496 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Chairs 493 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Lowery 491 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    The record shows that the State provided notice to Lowery’s counsel, that evidence would be presented to show that Lowery had needle marks on his arms—implying, of course, that he used illicit drugs and therefore had the intent to possess heroin.
  • State v. Barnes 489 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    Const. art. I, Section 5,); (Louisiana's `rape shield' statute); (rule of court).
  • State v. Dean 487 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    The general rule is that the prosecution within a reasonable time before trial must furnish in writing to the defendant a statement of other acts or offenses if it intends to offer into evidence specifying the exception to the general exclusionary rule upon which it relies for their admissibility, , (La.1982)
  • State v. Trigueros 485 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    The Court erred in allowing the State to introduce testimony of acts of purported misconduct by the defendant with the prosecuting witness over a
  • State v. Ward 483 So. 2d 578 La. 1986
    720 because in the penalty phase there has already been a determination of guilt lessening the chance that the defendant will be tried for crimes other than those charged.
  • State v. Labuzan 480 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Jackson 480 So. 2d 263 La. 1985
    Such prospective application is consistent with this Court's formulation of other safeguards in criminal procedure
  • State v. Williams 479 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Defense counsel contends that this evidence was highly prejudicial, that it did not prove knowledge, system, or intent
  • State v. Green 478 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    Otherwise, (or LRS 15:445, 446)—evidence of another crime, the prejudicial effect of the evidence must be balanced against its probative value and against the constitutional guarantees of due process and fair trial by impartial jury.
  • State v. Hamilton 478 So. 2d 123 La. 1985
  • State v. Collier 474 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    According to Collier, (La.
  • State v. Williams 472 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Valovich 472 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Appellant assigns several errors for our review: 1 (1) The trial court erred in allowing John Kinzie of the New Orleans Police Department to testify on rebuttal concerning a prior offense when the defendant had not received the required Prieur notice
  • State v. McCarter 469 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Cantu 469 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    Evidence of this prior conviction was ruled inadmissible at trial after a was sustained.
  • State v. Luwisch 468 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    ASSIGNMENTS 2 & 3 appellant argues that he was not given sufficient notice that the prosecution would present evidence of other crimes to show knowledge, system and intent.
  • State v. Cureaux 467 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Guarisco 466 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Barham 467 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Smith 466 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    [3] for the proposition that evidence of other crimes is generally inadmissible as the prejudicial effect of admission generally outweighs its probative value.
  • State v. Scroggins 465 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Johnson 464 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    The matter was submitted on the evidence taken at a hearing, at which the trial court ruled that the crime involving Mrs. D. would be admissible under Prieur .
  • State v. Hoyt 464 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    These were, Hoyt contends, illegal and inadmissible references to another crime, i.e., possession of marijuana
  • Phillips v. Plaquemines Parish School Bd. 465 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Johnson 458 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Johnson 458 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    and second, the evidence was inadmissible under the provisions of La.R.S.
  • State v. Kelly 456 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Williams 454 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Felo 454 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Joseph 454 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    the State sought to have the entire confession considered for the purpose as evidence of other crimes under the provisions of LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Baker 452 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Celestine 452 So. 2d 676 La. 1984
  • State v. Sanford 446 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Comment, *1384 Other Crimes Evidence in Louisiana, 33 La.L.Rev.