Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prieur, 277 So. 2d 126.

864 citing documents.

State v. McGuire 577 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Williams 575 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Mitchell 572 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
art. 404(B), and LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Jenkins 573 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
The trial court erred in denying defense counsel's motion for a mistrial and allowing evidence of other crimes to be admitted in violation of the Louisiana Code of Evidence Articles 404 and 1103
State v. Miller 571 So. 2d 603 La. 1990
State v. Lee 569 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Thompson 569 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Preston 569 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
He also argues that he was not given notice by the State of its intent to introduce evidence of "other crimes," i.e., distribution of cocaine citing
State v. Lewis 566 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Granier 563 So. 2d 1354 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Rasberry 564 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
the court ruled that evidence of other crimes not coming within the statutory exceptions to inadmissibility could not be presented to the jury.
State v. Robinson 563 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
OTHER CRIMES EVIDENCE By way of Assignment of Error No. 2, defendant maintains that the trial court *480 erred in allowing evidence of "other crimes" (La.
State v. Hall 558 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Felix 556 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Driggers 554 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
After defendant's indictment, which it alleged defendant committed with other female juveniles several years prior to the instant charges.
State v. Williams 553 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
our Supreme Court expressly recognized that “res gestae” 1 evidence is an exception to the prohibition against “other crimes” evidence.
State v. Skaggs 551 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Addison 551 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Breaux 546 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Tarleton 545 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Thompson 544 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
"In deciding whether the joinder of similar offenses necessitates a severance because of possible prejudice to the defendant, the trial court's decision is subject to the guidelines enunciated in Prieur [ ]."
State v. Schneider 542 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Although each crime committed was an armed robbery, the crimes were not so similar as to present a unique "modus operandi"
State v. Magouirk 539 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
In assignment of error number two, defendant argues that the trial court erred in admitting prejudicial evidence of "other crimes" allegedly committed by defendant
State v. Reaux 539 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Brooks 541 So. 2d 801 La. 1989
State v. Moore 534 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
The trial court erred in denying a mistrial when the prosecutor mentioned a [ State v. ] Prieur [ (La.
State v. Romero 533 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
15:445, Wigmore, supra; (2) there must be a real and genuine contested issue of intent at trial, State v. Germain, supra [ ]; (3) the probative value of the evidence must outweigh its prejudicial effect, State v. Harris, supra [ ], State v. Prieur, supra [ (La.
State v. Thompson 532 So. 2d 1160 La. 1988
State v. Taylor 533 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
In the first assignment of error in defendant’s pro se brief
State v. Dauzat 532 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Wright 535 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Baker 535 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
15:445 and 446 to establish intent, (La.
State v. Johnson 529 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Broussard 527 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Wascom 524 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Outside the presence of the jury, defense counsel moved for a mistrial on the basis that the prosecutor had referred to inadmissible other crimes evidence, i.e., forgeries; and, in support of his motion
State v. Deville 524 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
In addition, does not require the state to provide notice to defendant of crimes that fall within the res gestae exception.
State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Landry 524 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Hence, to provide notice of its intention to introduce evidence of other crimes.
State v. Clements 519 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
and say that a proper foundation was not laid.
State v. Thompson 519 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Howard 520 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Anderson 517 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Nelson 518 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Brown 514 So. 2d 99 La. 1987
Moreover, our law contains many jurisprudential rules, to guarantee due process of law and relevance in the introduction of other crimes evidence.
State v. Walters 514 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Burge 515 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
He claims the evidence, consisting of threats made by defendant, because it was not relevant to the proceeding.
State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
OTHER CRIMES EVIDENCE By these closely allied assignments of error
State v. Upchurch 510 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Harris 510 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
The Supreme Court went further and stated that the evidence of narcotics injections will almost always constitute evidence of prior criminal acts of illegal narcotics possession and that in Risen , was applicable.
State v. Thibodeaux 509 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In addition, does not require the State to provide notice to defendant of crimes that fall within the res gestae exception.