DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prieur, 277 So. 2d 126.

864 citing documents.

  • State v. Benoit 885 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Ellis 880 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    The state filed a Notice of Intent to Use Evidence of Other Crimes/Acts
  • State v. Merritt 877 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Brown, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    The issue in Williams, however, was whether for the purpose of Article 412.2, a
  • State v. Brown 874 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    The issue in Williams, however, was whether for the purpose of Article 412.2, a
  • State v. Morehead 870 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Brown 871 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    art. 404(B)(1), [2] and La.
  • State v. Dykes 867 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Subsequently, and a motion for a Prieur hearing.
  • State v. Rhea 868 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. JTS 865 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    15:446; State v. Carter, [ ]
  • State of Louisiana v. J.T.S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    15: 446; State v. Carter, []; (La.
  • State v. J.T.S. 865 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    15:446; State v. Carter, [ ]
  • State v. Roca 866 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Additionally, when determining whether two charged offenses should be severed for trial, and La.
  • State v. Black 864 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State of Louisiana v. William Odell Cash La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    10/20/98), -40, (emphasis added): Finally, must be met.
  • State v. Cash 861 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    He cites State v. McArthur, 97-2918, pp. 1-2 (La.10/20/98), -40 , (emphasis added): Finally, (La.
  • State v. Williams 862 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Olivieri 860 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Taylor 855 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Chatman 855 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Regarding this testimony, Chatman alleges that the trial court failed to hold a to enable the *880 state to introduce the other crimes evidence.
  • State v. Lyles 858 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In determining whether two charged offenses should be severed for trial, and La.
  • State v. Odom 861 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Glosson 843 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Glosson argues that during the trial the state intended to elicit testimony about the facts of the drug transaction that supposedly occurred in his home from him and Hatfield
  • State v. Mandosia 842 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Farhood 844 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Dauzart 844 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Marshall 841 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Bell 840 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Booker 839 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    art. 404(B) and State v. Prieur, *465 is not mandated when the evidence is relevant and probative to establish the elements of the crime charged.
  • State v. Millien 845 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Marshall 841 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    art. 404 B(1); State v. McGinnis, 00219 *871 (La.App.
  • State v. Galliano 839 So. 2d 932 La. 2003
    The district court conducted a
  • State v. Watts 835 So. 2d 441 La. 2003
    On November 20, 1998, the district court held a suppression hearing, and a hearing to determine the admissibility of "other crimes"
  • State v. Fortino 837 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Palmer 834 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    ^acknowledged in each case by each defendant, then a defendant would at least have the option of either: • requiring the state to prove this element, with the jury learning about the previous misdeed during opening instructions; or • conceding the proof of this element to the court, outside of the presence
  • State v. Parent 836 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    do not apply to "other crimes" evidence offered on rebuttal.
  • State v. Quiambao 833 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Maise, 00-1158 (La.1/15/02), ; (La.
  • State v. Cooks 833 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Williams 833 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Williams 830 So. 2d 984 La. 2002
    TRAYLOR, applies to evidence of other sexual offenses admitted pursuant to newly enacted La.
  • State v. Duncan 835 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    art. 404(B) by improperly making prior acts of abuse an element of the crime charged.
  • State v. Murray 827 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Anderson 824 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [2] [3] In Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S.Ct.
  • State v. Miller 824 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Morgan 830 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Nelson 817 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Wells 815 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Odoms 815 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Diez 811 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    art. 404 B(1); State v. McGinnis, 00-219, p. 4 (La.App.
  • State v. Richard 807 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    Defendant also argues that the trial court erred in admitting this evidence because the State failed to comply with the procedural requirements of written notice within a reasonable time before trial and a