DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prieur, 277 So. 2d 126.

864 citing documents.

  • State v. Hotard 975 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    [3] held that evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is generally inadmissible to impeach the character of the accused.
  • State v. Taylor 973 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Gerald Ray Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    However, in a separate trial on the joined offense, does not per se prevent the joinder and single trial of both crimes, if the joinder is otherwise permissible.
  • State v. LaGarde 970 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Mahogany 970 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Burbank 971 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Alsup 968 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Parker 963 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Lee 964 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    art. 404(B) to show "motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan and system, knowledge, and absence of mistake or accident" at trial.
  • State v. Rose 955 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
  • State v. Grant 954 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Rose 949 So. 2d 1236 La. 2007
    The State filed a and La.
  • State v. Williams 950 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul Roberts, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Roberts 947 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Smith 952 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized the prejudicial effect of the introduction of prior convictions, stating: The admissibility of other acts of misconduct involves substantial risk of grave prejudice to a defendant.
  • State v. Weatherspoon 948 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Anderson 942 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Roland Joseph Peltier, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    However, in a separate trial on the joined offense, does not per se prevent the joinder and single trial of both crimes, if the joinder is otherwise permissible.
  • State of Louisiana v. Leon D. Fussell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    However, in a separate trial on the joined offense, does not per se prevent the joinder and single trial of both crimes, if the joinder is otherwise permissible.
  • State v. Fussell 941 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    However, in a separate trial on the joined offense, does not per se prevent the joinder and single trial of both crimes, if the joinder is otherwise permissible.
  • State v. Davis 935 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Admission of this evidence requires that the state: (1) (2) prove by clear and convincing evidence that the other act occurred and was committed by the defendant; (3) show that the evidence falls within one of the La.
  • State v. Gibbs 935 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Leonard 932 So. 2d 660 La. 2006
    [1] *663 On December 11, 2003, the district court held a and denied admission of the evidence pertaining to the defendant's physical assaults upon his wife and daughter, finding that the two incidents the state sought to introduce were "an attempt to show bad character.
  • State v. Hano 938 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    art. 404 B (requiring the State to furnish defendant with a statement in writing of the criminal acts or offenses it intends to offer in evidence, specifying the exception to the general exclusionary rule upon which it relies for admissibility).
  • State of Louisiana v. Desmond Joseph Senegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Senegal 931 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized the prejudicial effect of the introduction of prior convictions, stating: The admissibility of other acts of misconduct involves substantial risk of grave prejudice to a defendant.
  • State v. Davis 930 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Roberson 929 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Jackson 926 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Davis 924 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Rose 925 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    *36 The state filed a (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Sammie Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    “Other Crimes” Evidence Defendant asserts that the trial court improperly allowed “other crimes” evidence to be admitted without a
  • State v. Davis 918 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    "Other Crimes" Evidence Defendant asserts that the trial court improperly allowed "other crimes" evidence to be admitted without a
  • State v. Dobbins 920 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
    The trial court conducted a (La.
  • State v. Morris 917 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    However, were applicable to Article 412.2.
  • State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    However, were applicable to Article 412.2.
  • State v. Martin 913 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Leonard 910 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Davis 911 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • State v. Skipper 906 So. 2d 399 La. 2005
    : "* * * the natural and inevitable tendency of the tribunal — whether judge or jury — is to give excessive weight to the vicious record of crime thus exhibited, and either to allow it to bear too strongly on the present charge, or to take the proof of it as justifying a condemnation irrespective of guil
  • Explained State of Louisiana v. James Allen Drake, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Therefore, the admissibility of other unrelated misconduct “involves substantial risk of grave prejudice to a defendant.” (citing 1 Wigmore, Evidence, § 194 (3rd ed.)).
  • Explained State v. Drake 903 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Therefore, the admissibility of other unrelated misconduct “involves substantial risk of grave prejudice to a defendant.” (citing 1 Wigmore, Evidence, § 194 (3rd ed.)).
  • State v. Mills 900 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Mutz 896 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    412.2, required a showing by clear and convincing evidence that defendant committed the other crimes evidence.
  • State v. Taylor 888 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    [2] [3] The defendant was also arrested in 1988 for illegal distribution of a substance promoted to be heroin.
  • State v. Nguyen 888 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Finally, must be satisfied.