Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

Aisole v. Dean 560 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Schouest v. Stipelcovich 560 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Evans v. Hawley 559 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Cockerham v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. 559 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Burks v. McKean 559 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Schollian v. Ullo 558 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Galentine v. First Family Financial Services 557 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Canter [v. Koehring], supra [ ] at 724 [ (La.1973) ]; Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
Young v. Colligan 560 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Jaffarzad v. Jones Truck Lines, Inc. 561 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Rosell v. ESCO 558 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 558 So. 2d 1106 La. 1990
as follows: When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trier of fact's finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error ...
Ermert v. Hartford Ins. Co. 559 So. 2d 467 La. 1990
Crowell v. City of Alexandria 558 So. 2d 216 La. 1990
BOSSIER MED. PROP. v. Abbott & Williams Constr. Co. 557 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
3rd Cir.1979), writ denied, (La.App.
Frick v. Ensor 557 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Bergez v. Simmons 557 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
McDaniel v. DeJean 556 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Whitney Nat. Bank v. Poydras Ctr. Assoc. 557 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State ex rel. S.S. 557 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State in Interest of Cason, supra.
Duncan v. STATE, DOTD 556 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Draper v. Draper 556 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
3rd Cir. 1979), writ denied, (La.
Nichols v. US Rentals, Inc. 556 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Sicarelli v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 556 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Matthews v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 555 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Melancon v. J.B. Thibodeaux, Inc. 557 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
” After carefully reviewing the record, we do not find that the jury’s decision was clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous.
Fonseca v. Hall 555 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Lang v. Cage 554 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Shroyer v. Grush 555 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
The Supreme Court has limited appellate review of factual findings made by a trial court, (La.
Huey T. Littleton Claims Service v. McGuffee 554 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Clouatre v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 557 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
ANALYSIS — concluding: When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
Pittman v. Pomeroy 552 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
3rd Cir.1979), writ denied, Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
Swartzlander v. Hunt Laboratory, Inc. 552 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Nu-Lite Electrical Wholesalers, Inc. v. Deckard & Treadaway Electric Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, (5th Cir.1986).
Moody v. Terry's Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. 552 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
3rd Cir.1979), writ denied, (La.App.
White v. McCoy 552 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Ford v. Sears 552 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Molbert v. Toepfer 550 So. 2d 183 La. 1989
Merrill v. Jones 552 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Noel v. Esgard, Inc., (La.App.
Keiser v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad 550 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
our Supreme Court enunciated the rule that “when there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manife
Comberrel v. Basford 550 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Dailey v. Royal Insurance Co. 551 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Woods v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., (La.App.
Bernardi v. Bernardi 551 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Pitts v. Bailes 551 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
This item of damages presents a (La.
Schulze v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 551 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Glass v. Wiltz 551 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Foster v. Craig Equipment Co. 550 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State in Interest of Braden v. Nash 550 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Lawless v. New Orleans Police Dept. 550 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Rosell v. Esco 549 So. 2d 840 La. 1989
American Security Bank of Ville Platte v. Deshotel 548 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Fontenot v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 548 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the proper standard for appellate review of facts as follows: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should