Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.

2744 citing documents.

White v. CF Industries, Inc. 411 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
The criteria for imposing individual tort liability on a co-employee, agent, or officer of a at 721 (La.1973): "1.
McNeal v. DIVISION OF STATE POLICE, ETC. 412 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Green v. Farmers Ins. Co. 412 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Williams v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
Martin v. Howard Bros. Discount Stores, Inc. 412 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
found that the decision of the trial court was based upon its reasonable evaluation of the evidence produced at the trial and that the court’s findings in light of the evidence was not manifest error.
Thames v. Zerangue 411 So. 2d 17 La. 1982
Gamble v. Bill Lowrey Chevrolet, Inc. 410 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Kinchen v. Rigamer 411 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Martinez v. UNITED STATES FID. & GUARANTY 412 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Because executive officer liability is determined by general tort principles enunciated in our jurisprudence interpreting the fault concept of Civil Code Article 2315 ( Canter v. Koehring Company, La., ), the affirmative defense of contributory negligence is appropriate.
Dowty v. Blue Cross of La. 410 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hills v. Pegg 410 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Martin v. H. B. Zachry Co. 411 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Noel v. Esgard, Inc. 411 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Molenaar v. McGILL MFG. CO., INC. 410 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
(La.S.Ct.1973) and subsequent cases, set forth the standard which we are to follow.
Johnson v. Doe 410 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
UNITED STATES, ETC. v. Victory Land Co. 410 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Downs v. Downs 410 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Lofton v. Louisiana Pac. Corp. 410 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Bridges v. Reliance Ins. Co. 410 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
CCH, INC. v. Heard 410 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Ryals v. Home Ins. Co. 410 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
The criteria for imposing individual liability upon the agent, supervisor or employee of a (La.
Castille v. Melancon 410 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Siler v. Guillotte 410 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
Lytell v. Hushfield 408 So. 2d 1344 La. 1982
we laid out the following criteria for imposing individual liability on an executive: 1.
Gonzalez v. Lockette 410 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Webb v. Hughes 408 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Franco v. Kar Products, Inc. 409 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Fenetz v. Stine 407 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.
Standard Fire Insurance v. Mapes 408 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Langlois v. Jarreau 409 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The trial court was not clearly wrong
Baton Rouge General Hospital v. Hotard 408 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Aleman v. Favret Co., Inc.
Union Local P-1476 of the Amalgamated Meatcutters & Butcher Workmen v. Union Citizens Club of Terrebonne Parish 408 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Schiro v. Viola 408 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Accordingly, we are constrained to adhere to the admonition that “where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review, even though the appellate court may feel that its own evaluations and inferences are as reasonable.”
Patterson v. Jackson 409 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Canter v. Koehring Co., La., (1973).
Williams v. Ourso 409 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Southbend Contractors, Inc. v. Parish of Jefferson 408 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1981
Thus, there is presented to us the classic issue of “evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding” established as a
Woodard v. Mays 416 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Johnston v. Johnston 408 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Beasley v. Mouton 408 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
1st Cir., 1976), we stated that: "...
STATE, ETC. v. Guillory 407 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Jolivette v. City of Lafayette 408 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Campbell v. Tidwell 407 So. 2d 1359 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Duhon v. Dugas 407 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Hensley v. Miley 408 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.
Zone v. Town of Bunkie 407 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Babineaux v. Continental Oil Co. 407 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
” After hearing extensive medical and lay testimony, the trial judge concluded that “between the dates of April 20, 1979 and July 14, 1980, there is simply not enough adverse medical testimony to overcome the convincing weight of the lay testimony that plaintiff was in fact disabled as a result of the accide
Louisiana Power and Light Co. v. Roberts 408 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, (La.
Crochet v. American Tobacco Co. 407 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, (La.
Joseph v. Albarado 407 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
[3] the court articulated the following criteria for imposing liability on individual executive officers at 721: "1.
A-1 Construction Co. v. Brown 407 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Nash v. La Fontaine 407 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981