Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So. 2d 716.
-
Weaver v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc.
406 So. 2d 792
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
She slid’s Her Foot When she Walk and that cause her to tilt the Rug and Fall.” Notwithstanding that defendant’s inference is not an unreasonable one, we cannot substitute other reasonable inferences for a reasonable one that the trial judge adopted, (La.
-
Jaconne v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets
407 So. 2d 513
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Canter v. *514 Koehring Co., La.1973, .
- Ball v. Ford Motor Co. 407 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Texaco, Inc. 407 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Aloise v. Jones 407 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- L & L Sandblasting, Inc. v. American Southern Insurance Co. 407 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Powell v. Tac Amusement Co. 406 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Oliver v. Parish of Jefferson
408 So. 2d 275
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
at 724: "When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court's finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
- Ortego v. Lebert 406 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
-
Johnson v. Alexander
406 So. 2d 1378
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
-
Baltzar v. Missouri Pac. RR
406 So. 2d 324
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Canter *327 v. Koehring Company, (La.
- Reid v. Allstate Ins. Co. 407 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
- McElroy v. Vest 407 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
-
Hammond v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York
407 So. 2d 13
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Hall v. Houston General Ins.
- Joseph v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 406 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Spillers v. Cities Service Co.
406 So. 2d 269
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Cadiere v. West Gibson Products Co., Inc., supra
- Green v. Rollins 406 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Coleman v. Occidental Life Insurance Co. of North Carolina 407 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Peralta v. Schwegmann Bros. Gt. Supermkts
406 So. 2d 720
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
We find these are reasonable inferences by the trial court, and thus not subject to displacement on appeal by other equally reasonable inferences
- Coludrovich v. Hess 407 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Williams v. Jones 405 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Francois v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York 405 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Jenkins v. Dearie 405 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Eads v. Probst 405 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Wolfe v. Jones 405 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Reliable Credit Corp. v. Smith 406 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Belaire v. Vanderbrook 405 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Taunton v. Cane Air, Inc. 405 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
- Rodgers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad 405 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Guillory v. Texas Petro Gas Co.
405 So. 2d 607
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., supra; Johnson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., Inc., supra.
-
Hickman v. Miller
405 So. 2d 612
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc., Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., Johnson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., Inc.
- Cormier v. Foremost Ins. Co. 405 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
- Augustine v. COURTNEY CONST. CO., ETC. 405 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
- Brown v. White 405 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
-
Serean v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets, Inc.
405 So. 2d 553
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
But we conclude, on the facts present, it would be an entirely reasonable inference by the trial court, and therefore an inference not subject to displacement on appeal by other equally reasonable inferences, Canter v. Koehring Co., La.1973, , that more probably than not the green onion on the floor came from defendant’s own employee who was restocking the produce counter.
- Ellerd v. Williams 404 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Muller v. Giacona
404 So. 2d 533
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
See Canter v. Koehring Company, La., .
- Wattigny v. Lambert 408 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
-
Knecht v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
408 So. 2d 1147
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
the trial judge’s factual findings are not disturbed on appellate review unless the record establishes that they are clearly wrong.
- Williams v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 404 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Ahern v. Weicks 403 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Boagni v. Waterbury
403 So. 2d 856
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Since their testimony together with the other evidence in the record furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial judge's finding that the transactions were real and not simulations
- Avilez v. South Jefferson General Hospital 403 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- West v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 405 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
-
Sanders v. United Distributors, Inc.
405 So. 2d 536
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Allowing to the trial judge the basic fact-finding function that is his, Canter v. Koehring Co., La.1973, , we cannot say that he erred in concluding that plaintiff could have continued in his employment for at least some period beyond the day he retired, and that defendant would not have fired him during his recuperative period had he sought to continue, but would have allowed him to continue (or even that, as his doctor
- Trichel v. Louisiana State Highway Department 402 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Jones v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
402 So. 2d 287
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
See also Canter v. Koehring [Co.]
-
Adams v. Adams
402 So. 2d 300
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
- Carpenter v. Travelers Ins. Co. 402 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
-
Levesque v. Saba
402 So. 2d 266
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
[8] Arceneaux v. Domingue, La., ; Canter v. Koehring Company, La., .