Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Glover, 343 So. 2d 118.

83 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Byrielle Hebert La. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Lisa W. Rabalais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
19 An inculpatory statement is “one that refers to the out-of-court admission of incriminating facts made by the accused after the crime has been committed” and “relates to past events.”
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Goodly -Aka- Christopher Bryant Goodly La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3/30/12), -26 (alteration in original), with regard to the ever changing requirements of review: Although in the past this Court rejected the view in other jurisdictions that “a confession may be involuntary in the due process sense only where the declarant has been subjected to police custody, external pressure or coercion,” (on reh‟g) (statements made by defendant to his former common-law wife wired for sound by the police rendered involuntary as a result of defendant‟s florid undifferentiated
State v. Goodley 209 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3/30/12), -26 (alteration in original), with regard to the ever changing requirements of review: Although in the past this Court rejected the view in other jurisdictions that “a confession may be involuntary in the due process sense only where the declarant has been subjected to police custody, external pressure or coercion,” (La.
State v. Thornton 83 So. 3d 1024 La. 2012
Although in the past this Court rejected the view in other jurisdictions that “a confession may be involuntary in the due process sense only where the de-clarant has been subjected to police custody, external pressure or coercion,” (on reh’g) (statements made by defendant to his former common-law wife wired for sound by the police rendered involuntary as a result of defendant’s florid undifferentiated schizophrenia), our current jurisprudence subscribes as a matter of state law to the rule of Co
State of Louisiana v. Aaron W. Ardoin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Ardoin 58 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Ray Easterling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Easterling 1 So. 3d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson 993 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Brooks, 92-3331, p. 12, (La.1/17/95), ( Brooks 2 ), (on rehearing).
State of Louisiana v. Calvin Joseph Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Coleman 976 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. James 897 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
State v. Raiford 846 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Brooks, 92-3331, p. 12, (La.1/17/95), ( Brooks 2 ), (on rehearing).
State v. Weber 834 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Hall 750 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Fugler 721 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Smith 677 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Green 655 So. 2d 272 La. 1995
( on rehearing ), reflecting the view of the United States Supreme Court at the time, posited that the existence of police misconduct or overreaching was not determinative as to the evidentiary admissibility of an involuntary confession; rather, the Court adopted the view "that the probable testimonial trust
State v. Green 655 So. 2d 252 La. 1995
State v. Freeman 653 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Because of the presumption, once the State establishes beyond a reasonable doubt that a confession was freely and voluntarily made, the “defendant bears the burden of proving the existence of a mental abnormality which under the circumstances may have destroyed the voluntary nature of his confession.” (La.App.
State v. Brooks 648 So. 2d 366 La. 1995
State v. Dugar 643 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Green 634 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Johnson 633 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Jackson 600 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Bordelon 597 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Castille 590 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Lamark 584 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Ashworth 554 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Golmon, supra .
State v. Brooks 541 So. 2d 801 La. 1989
State v. Golmon 536 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
is dispositive of this issue and attempts to buttress her claim with expert psychiatric testimony.
State v. Waymire 504 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Perry 502 So. 2d 543 La. 1986
for his contention that defendant's mental state precluded his confession from being free and voluntary.
State v. Guidry 496 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Mire 492 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Roux 487 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
on rehearing, the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that the state bears the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that a confession or inculpatory statement is free and voluntary.
State v. Rogers 476 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. James 459 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Felo 454 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Reeves 427 So. 2d 403 La. 1983
State v. McDowell 427 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. David 425 So. 2d 1241 La. 1983
State v. Serrato 424 So. 2d 214 La. 1982
State v. Mitchell 421 So. 2d 851 La. 1982
2408 , 57 L.Ed.2d 290 (1978)
State v. Lefevre 419 So. 2d 862 La. 1982
State v. Vaccaro 411 So. 2d 415 La. 1982
State v. Howard 414 So. 2d 1210 La. 1982
State v. Rodrigue 409 So. 2d 556 La. 1982
State v. West 408 So. 2d 1302 La. 1982
in which the Court held that Glover's statements were inadmissible because his mental condition was so poor that it was not possible for him to give a voluntary statement.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by