Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crosby, 338 So. 2d 584.
- State Of Louisiana v. Mark Houston Anglin, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
- State of Louisiana Versus Dewayne A. Allen La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
- State of Louisiana Versus Dewayne A. Allen La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
- State of Louisiana v. Ray Donald Brister, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
-
State of Louisiana v. Colin Gilmartin
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
On March 18, 2019, Defendant withdrew his prior pleas of not guilty and entered pleas of guilty as charged; however, he reserved his right to appeal the trial court’s (La.
- State of Louisiana Versus Kevin Barker La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
- State of Louisiana Versus Symmeron Nigel Cole La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
- State of Louisiana Versus Corey Bannister La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
- State of Louisiana v. Derrick James Lambert -Aka Derrick Lambert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
-
State of Louisiana v. Darrel Brown Mathieu
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
“A plea of guilty normally waives all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings prior to the plea.”
- State of Louisiana v. James Ray Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
-
State of Louisiana v. Malik K. Lawson
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
On September 17, 1 “ allows a Defendant to enter a guilty plea, but reserve his or her right to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress the evidence.” State v. Hall, 14-0738, p. 1 n. 3 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Dupart
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
14:95.7; and (4) illegal possession 1 “ allows a defendant to enter a guilty plea, but reserve his or her right to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress the evidence.” State v. Hall, 14-0738 p. 1 n.3 (La.
- State Of Louisiana v. Casey Lynn Lane La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- State of Louisiana v. Tyrone D. Johnson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
-
State of Louisiana v. Dwayne Griffin
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Defendant then entered a guilty plea, (La.
-
State v. Ford
275 So. 3d 404
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
19 In his fourth assignment of error, defendant argues that his January 6, 2014 guilty pleas in district court case number 12-0652 for distribution of cocaine in a drug-free zone (count one) and possession of cocaine (count three) were tendered pursuant to State v. Crosby , (1976), and are invalid for sentence enhancement purposes.
-
State of Louisiana Versus Derrick A. Ford, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
07/01/08), 18 As such, defendant cannot raise this issue on appeal.19 In his fourth assignment of error, defendant argues that his January 6, 2014 guilty pleas in district court case number 12-0652 for distribution of cocaine in a drug-free zone (count one) and possession of cocaine (count three) (1976), and are invalid for sentence enhancement purposes.
-
State v. Carter
274 So. 3d 831
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
No rulings were preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State v. Lawrence
273 So. 3d 537
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Appellate counsel contends that defendant pled guilty and was sentenced pursuant to a counseled plea agreement and no rulings were preserved for appeal under State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State v. Lawrence
273 So. 3d 548
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Appellate counsel indicates that defendant pled guilty and was sentenced pursuant to a counseled plea agreement and no rulings were preserved for appeal under State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State v. Sparks
271 So. 3d 308
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
JUDGE SANDRA CABRINA JENKINS Pursuant to State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State v. Spriggs
271 So. 3d 320
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
MOLAISON, J. Defendant, Bennie Spriggs, appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence following his guilty plea to drug offenses, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and obstruction of justice with a reservation of his right to appeal the trial court's ruling on the suppression motion, pursuant to State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State v. Cuza
271 So. 3d 369
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970) and State v. Crosby , , 588 (La.
- State v. McGarr 268 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
-
State v. England
268 So. 3d 1178
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Crosby , , 588 (La.
-
State v. Black
265 So. 3d 1014
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
She particularly notes that there were no pretrial rulings preserved for appeal, as Defendant did not plea under State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State v. Thibodaux
261 So. 3d 773
La. 2019
State v. Crosby , , 586 (La.
-
State v. Johnson
264 So. 3d 593
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
1602 , 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973) ); State v. Crosby , , 586 (La.
-
State ex rel. Burton v. State
261 So. 3d 769
La. 2019
State v. Crosby , , 586 (La.
-
State v. Blackwell
263 So. 3d 1234
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Defendant pled guilty pursuant to State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State v. Overstreet
263 So. 3d 1241
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
WINDHORST, J. *1244 Defendant, Rickey Overstreet, through appointed counsel and by pro se brief, appeals his convictions and sentences which resulted from a guilty plea entered under State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State v. Broussard
268 So. 3d 307
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
After being advised of his rights, defendant then entered a plea of guilty as to the second count, , 586 (La.
-
State v. Nellon
262 So. 3d 441
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Because we find that defendant failed to preserve review of any pretrial rulings in accordance with State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State v. Mark
262 So. 3d 1070
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
No rulings were preserved for appeal under State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State ex rel. Smith v. State
258 So. 3d 587
La. 2018
State v. Crosby , , 586 (La.
-
State v. Cooks
260 So. 3d 1270
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
She further states that there were no trial court rulings to preserve for appeal under State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State v. Turner
260 So. 3d 1277
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5 Thus, no rulings were preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State v. Chirlow
260 So. 3d 1282
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
No rulings were preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Joshua B. Mayeaux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
The entry of that plea waived all pre-plea non-jurisdictional defects
-
State v. Stevens
260 So. 3d 776
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Furthermore, defendant did not reserve his right to appellate review of any pre-trial rulings under State v. Crosby , (La.
- State v. Cooper 261 So. 3d 975 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
-
State v. Williams
259 So. 3d 593
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
No rulings were preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. Crosby , , 588 (La.
-
State v. Chirlow
259 So. 3d 604
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
No rulings were preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State v. Jackson
259 So. 3d 533
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
No rulings were preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State v. Ordon
259 So. 3d 620
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Furthermore, defendant did not reserve his right to appellate review of the denial of his motions to suppress evidence and statements under State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State v. Nelson
259 So. 3d 611
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
No rulings were preserved for appeal under the holding in State v. Crosby , (La.
-
State v. Comeaux
255 So. 3d 1036
La. 2018
1981) ; State v. Crosby , , 586 (La.
-
State ex rel. Dees v. State
255 So. 3d 1040
La. 2018
State v. Crosby , , 586 (La.
-
State v. Ecker
258 So. 3d 993
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
She contends that defendant did not plead guilty under State v. Crosby , (La.