Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Passman, 345 So. 2d 874.

92 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Cody Nicholas Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
1856, 85 L.Ed.2d 152 (1985)
State of Louisiana Versus Adam Littleton La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
App. 3 Cir. 12/23/14), ( (La.
State v. Hutsell 241 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
In a similar case, State v. Passman , (La.
State v. Harrison 239 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Derrick A. Dotson La. 2017
juror’s impartiality was brought into question by her “maybe not” response to whether she would acquit the defendant of one crime even if she thought he was guilty of other misconduct, this court found no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of a challenge for cause in light of the prospective juror’s subsequent responses which indicated she would be impartial.); -80 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
State v. Nelson 169 So. 3d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Lee, 93-2810 (La.5/23/94)
State v. McClure 169 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v.. Lee, 93-2810 (La.5/23/94)
State of Louisiana v. Jaime Brooks Day La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Day 158 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Magee 150 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94)
State v. Nellum 136 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Lee , 93-2810 at p. 9, 637 So.2d at 108 ().
State of Louisiana v. Horatio Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Cleveland Troy Bias La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Kirk 98 So. 3d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94), ,108
State v. Andrews 61 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94)
State v. Burton 43 So. 3d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94)
State of Louisiana v. D D La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Arnaudville, 170 La.
State v. DD 34 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Arnaudville, 170 La.
State v. Robinson 11 So. 3d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
L 12State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 9 (La.5/23/94)
State of Louisiana v. Paul Roberts, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Roberts 947 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
at 654 (citing State v. Lee, 93-2810 (La.5/23/94), , ).
State of Louisiana v. Levi Joseph Garrick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Garrick 879 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
1856 , 85 L.Ed.2d 152 ; (La.
State v. Garrick 879 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Kang 859 So. 2d 649 La. 2003
Lee, 93-2810 at p. 9, 637 So.2d at 108 ().
State v. Nightengale 818 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Schmidt 771 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Wright 741 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Martin 736 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1856 , 85 L.Ed.2d 152 (1985)
State v. Guillory 715 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Turner 692 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Cross 658 So. 2d 683 La. 1995
1856 , 85 L.Ed.2d 152 (1985)
State v. Lee 637 So. 2d 102 La. 1994
In reference to the trial judge's great discretion in this area, this Court, stated: We have repeatedly held that the trial judge is vested with broad discretion in ruling on challenges for cause, and only where it appears, upon review of the voir dire examination as a whole, that the judge's exercise of that discretion has been arbitrary or unreasonable, resulting in prejudice
State v. Washington 626 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.5(b); ABA Standards Relating to the Prosecution Function, Standard 5.4(a), Relations with jury
State v. Lewis 611 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Honeyman 565 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Collins 546 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Vance 544 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
2374 , 80 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984)
State v. Johnson 541 So. 2d 818 La. 1989
(trial judge correctly refused jury's request to examine police radio log).
State v. Crook 517 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Gongre 503 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Joe 502 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. LaBauve 496 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
15:484 which provides in part that “testimony to establish the credibility of a witness is not admissible until that credibility has been attacked.”
State v. Smith 491 So. 2d 641 La. 1986
State v. Vampran 491 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Ward 483 So. 2d 578 La. 1986
State v. Johnson 482 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Smith 477 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985