Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davies, 350 So. 2d 586.

94 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Collins La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 1/8/14), (); See also State v. Patterson, 2010-415, p. 14 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Tyler N. Derochowski La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Zachary Markey Adams A/K/A Zachary Adams A/K/A Zachary Batiste La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
The State also argues that “defendant’s flight to avoid apprehension indicated a consciousness of guilt,”
State Ex Rel. Darrell J. Robinson v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola, Louisiana La. 2024
indicates consciousness of guilt and, therefore, is one of the circumstances from which the jury may infer guilt.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Demyron L. Skinner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Dereginald L. King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Flight following an offense, as well as concealment, and attempt to avoid apprehension indicate “consciousness of guilt and, therefore, [are] circumstances from which the jury may infer guilt.”
State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen McPhearson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State Ex Rel. Darrell J. Robinson v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola, Louisiana La. 2024
State of Louisiana v. David Anthony Burns La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
While evidence of concealment indicates consciousness of guilt, (La.
State of Louisiana v. Marvin Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Flight following an offense, as well as concealment, and attempt to avoid apprehension indicate “consciousness of guilt and, therefore, [are] circumstances from which the jury may infer guilt.”
State of Louisiana v. Johnathan Trayvon Kelly La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Elizabeth Marie Alfred A/K/A Elizabeth Alfred La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Jerome Gray La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State v. Daniels 262 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1982) (citing State v. Davies , , 588 (La.1977) ).
State of Louisiana v. Major Cartrell Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
The panel’s discussion included a wherein the supreme court explained that “‘[e]vidence of flight, concealment, and attempt to avoid apprehension is relevant.
State v. Jones 258 So. 3d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
The panel's discussion included a passage from State v. Davies , , 588 (La.1977), wherein the supreme court explained that " '[e]vidence of flight, concealment, and attempt to avoid apprehension is relevant.
State of Louisiana v. Zachary Alexander Bench La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Bench 256 So. 3d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
117 So.3d at 146 (citing State v. Davies , , 588 (La.1977) ).
State v. Trung Le 243 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1982) (citing State v. Davies
State of Louisiana v. Robert Sinegal -Aka- Robert Senegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
indicates consciousness of guilt and, therefore, is one of the circumstances from which the jury may infer guilt.”
State of Louisiana v. Channing R. Gray 218 So. 3d 40 La. 2017
6/29/12), (per 9 curiam); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Kerry Bertrand La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Bertrand 209 So. 3d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Christopher 209 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Vincent Devonte Dotson AKA Vincent Dotson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Debbie E. Adams AKA Debbie Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
It indicates consciousness of guilt, and therefore, is one of the circumstances from which the jury may infer guilt.”
State v. Serigne 193 So. 3d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
the Court expressly stated that at' the time of the alleged crime, March 1976, “the offense of aggravated rape was classified as a capital offense.” 'Id.
State v. Powell 179 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State of Louisiana v. Quint Mire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
It indicates consciousness of guilt and, therefore, is one of the circumstances from which the jury may infer guilt.”
State v. Mire 149 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
It indicates consciousness of guilt and, therefore, is one of the circumstances from which the jury may infer guilt.”
State v. Byrd 145 So. 3d 536 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Ashley, 33,880 (La.App.2d Cir.10/4/00), , writ denied, 00-3122 (La.12/8/00)
State v. Coleman 133 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
It indicates consciousness of guilt and, therefore, is one of the circumstances from which a jury may infer guilt.”
State v. Carmouche 117 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Jamal James Carmouche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Rogrick M. Van Dyke La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State ex rel. D.M. 91 So. 3d 296 La. 2012
requiring a showing of mens rea or criminal intent-”), the majority concluded that the state’s case turned on the question whether defendant’s flight and concealment constituted reliable circumstantial evidence of his “ ‘consciousness of guilt and, therefore, [ ] one of the circumstances from which the [fact finder] may infer guilt.’ ” D.M., 11-0462 at 7, 80 So.3d at 22 ()
State ex rel. T.E. 91 So. 3d 292 La. 2012
(“Evidence of flight, concealment, and attempt to avoid apprehension is relevant.
State v. Abdul 94 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Burbank, 07-125, p. 4 (La.App.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS ERIC DARELL COSEY AKA HENRY CARTER AKA KENDRICK CARTER La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
In support of his argument, the Defendant refers to State v. Jacobs, 6 So.3d at 319, wherein this court noted, ― established that evidence of flight, concealment, and attempt to avoid apprehension is indicative of consciousness of guilt and may be considered by a jury to infer guilt.
State Ex Rel. Dm 80 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State ex rel. of D.M. 80 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Flight from a police officer, the state argues, “indicates consciousness of guilt and, therefore, is one of the circumstances from which the jury may infer guilt.”
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Jacobs 6 So. 3d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
established that evidence of flight, concealment, and attempt to avoid apprehension is indicative of consciousness of guilt and may be considered by a jury to infer guilt.
State v. Burbank 971 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Lewis 965 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Richards 956 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Huey Lee Richards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State ex rel. E.D.C. 903 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Lewis, 34,805 (La.App.
State v. Butler 850 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Brown, 24,840 (La.App.2d Cir.5/5/93), , writ denied, 93-1449 (La.9/24/93), .