Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carollo v. Wilson, 353 So. 2d 249.

108 citing documents.

Barber Brothers Contracting Company, LLC v. Capitol City Produce Company, LLC; Frank Cushenberry; And Xyz Insurance Company C/W … La. 2024
in awarding general damages.” (La.
Barber Brothers Contracting Company, LLC v. Capitol City Produce Company, LLC Frank Cushenberry And Xyz Insurance Company C/W … La. 2024
in awarding general damages.” (La.
Henry Pete v. Boland Marine And Manufacturing La. 2023
in awarding damages.” (La.
David Crawford Versus Allstate Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Charles, Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Brittainey Huntley v. 21st Century Premier Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
Huntley v. 21st Century Premier Insurance Co. 204 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may oh appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
Williams v. Walgreen Louisiana Co. 168 So. 3d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Charles, Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Mary Phyllis Soileau v. Smith True Value and Rental La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra.
Soileau v. Smith True Value & Rental 130 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra.
Boudreaux v. Plaquemines Parish Government ex rel. President 22 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Boudreaux v. PLAQ. PAR. GOVT. EX REL. PRES. 22 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
Judie Lucas v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1st Cir. 1989); Temple v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Colleen Wood v. American National Property & Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
art. 5, § 10(B); La.Civ.Code art. 1999; ; Temple v. Liberty Mut.
Wood v. American National Property & Casualty Ins. Co. 1 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1986); Temple v. Liberty Mut.
Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Desoto Parish School Bd. 907 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Noran J. Robin, Jr., Et Ux. v. Allstate Indemnity Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra.
Robin v. Allstate Indemnity Co. 889 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra.
Baudier v. Cheron 876 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra
Riley v. Salley 874 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Gunn v. Robertson 801 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra .
Bowers v. Liuzza 769 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra.
Lombas v. Southern Foods, Inc. 760 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra.
Adams v. Marathon Oil Co. 688 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra .
Edwards v. Pelican State Mutual Insurance Co. 657 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Migues v. Hebert, 93-1509 (La.App.
Tartar v. Hymes 656 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra .
Budd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 650 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Migues v. Hebert, 93-1509 (La.App.
Fleming v. Smith 638 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses *474 an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, (La.
Clement v. Griffin 634 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Theriot v. Allstate Ins. Co. 625 So. 2d 1337 La. 1993
Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra .
Moody v. Moody 622 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
LaCombe v. Dr. Walter Olin Moss Reg. Hosp. 617 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
Cay v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 614 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
Berthelot v. Leday 606 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Girard v. Price 606 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
LeBlanc v. Modern Flooring, Inc. 596 So. 2d 543 La. 1992
Hardy v. Delta Downs, Inc. 599 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
Monceaux v. Jennings Rice Drier, Inc. 590 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
American Motorist v. American Rent-All 579 So. 2d 429 La. 1991
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Clomon v. Monroe City School Bd. 557 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
Davis v. Husqvarna Motor 561 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
Rosell v. ESCO 558 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that award may, on appellate review, for articulated reason be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
Nastasi v. Fejka 556 So. 2d 1307 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, (La.
Pitts v. Bailes 551 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
Williams v. Exxon Corp. 541 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
2d 925 (La.1986); Temple v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Archie v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF LA. STATE UNIV. 543 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
art. 1999; Temple v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Moon v. City of Baton Rouge 522 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Karam v. DeSoto 520 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
* * * * * * "It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.
Roger v. Estate of Moulton 513 So. 2d 1126 La. 1987
Jordan v. Travelers Insurance, Inc., 257 La.
Sexton v. Louisiana Vacuum Services, Inc. 506 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
art. 1999; [1] Temple v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Thomas v. State Farm Ins. Co. 499 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
It is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive, or insufficient, Olds v. Ashley, 250 La.