Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 359 So. 2d 137.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
The year after Lee was decided
-
State of Louisiana v. Raven Lamar Wiltz
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
The year after Lee was decided
-
State v. Vidrine
5 So. 3d 1062
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Baker, 28,152 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Casey Vidrine
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Baker, 28,152 (La.App.
- State v. Pennison 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
- State v. Montgomery 974 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
-
State v. Galliano
945 So. 2d 701
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
See, -140 (1978), (defendant was precluded from challenging testimony on appeal because he objected too late).
- State of Louisiana v. Marcus Deangelo Tennors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State v. Tennors 923 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State v. Tate 880 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
-
State of Louisiana v. Kiley M. Williams
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
8 The year after Lee was decided
-
State v. Williams
878 So. 2d 765
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
The year after Lee was decided
- State v. Narcisse 833 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Black 786 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
-
State v. Calhoun
776 So. 2d 1188
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Baker, 28,152 (La.App.
-
State v. Adams
715 So. 2d 118
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Baker, 28,152 (La.App.
- State v. Hooker 623 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- State v. Bennett 623 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. Robinson 598 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
- State v. Moore 575 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- State v. Munoz 575 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
-
State v. Faulkner
570 So. 2d 516
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
(1978), appeal after remand
-
State v. Clayton
570 So. 2d 519
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. *528 Sepulvado, appeal after remand (La.App.
- State v. Mitchell 553 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Richardson
550 So. 2d 961
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
appeal after remand (La.App.
- State v. Dewhirst 551 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Skipper
527 So. 2d 1171
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
appeal after remand, 367 So.
- State v. Johnson 529 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
State v. Oubre
524 So. 2d 221
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Nevertheless, , (La.1978), same case, the court expressly stated that “the imposition of a sentence although within the statutory limits may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable ...
-
State v. Smith
520 So. 2d 1252
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
appeal after remand, (La.App.
- State v. Rochefort 504 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
-
State v. Preston
498 So. 2d 79
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
appeal after remand (La.App.
-
State v. Parr
498 So. 2d 103
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
appeal after remand (La.App.
- State v. Davis 496 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
-
State v. Smith
496 So. 2d 1221
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
appeal after remand, (La.App.
-
State v. Piazza
496 So. 2d 1229
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Nevertheless, , (La.1978), same case, the court expressly stated that “the imposition of a sentence although within the statutory limits may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable ...
-
State v. Piazza
496 So. 2d 1229
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Nevertheless, , (La.1978), same case, the court expressly stated that "the imposition of a sentence although within the statutory limits may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable ...
- State v. Hobbs 494 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
-
State v. Barnes
489 So. 2d 402
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
appeal after remand the court expressly stated that "the imposition of a sentence, although within the statutory limit, may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable ...
-
State v. Rivers
470 So. 2d 351
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
appeal after remand the court expressly stated that "the imposition of a sentence, although within the statutory limit, may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable ...
- State v. Allen 451 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
- State v. Richardson 444 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Cox 441 So. 2d 723 La. 1983
- State v. Smith 433 So. 2d 688 La. 1983
- State v. Lewis 416 So. 2d 921 La. 1982
- State v. Wimberly 414 So. 2d 666 La. 1982
- State v. Latin 412 So. 2d 1357 La. 1982
- State v. Veals 407 So. 2d 675 La. 1981
- State v. Guillory 404 So. 2d 453 La. 1981
- State v. Spruell 403 So. 2d 63 La. 1981