Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 359 So. 2d 137.

72 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    The year after Lee was decided
  • State of Louisiana v. Raven Lamar Wiltz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    The year after Lee was decided
  • State v. Vidrine 5 So. 3d 1062 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    State v. Baker, 28,152 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Casey Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    State v. Baker, 28,152 (La.App.
  • State v. Pennison 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Montgomery 974 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Galliano 945 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    See, -140 (1978), (defendant was precluded from challenging testimony on appeal because he objected too late).
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus Deangelo Tennors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Tennors 923 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Tate 880 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. Kiley M. Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    8 The year after Lee was decided
  • State v. Williams 878 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    The year after Lee was decided
  • State v. Narcisse 833 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Black 786 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Calhoun 776 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    State v. Baker, 28,152 (La.App.
  • State v. Adams 715 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Baker, 28,152 (La.App.
  • State v. Hooker 623 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Bennett 623 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Robinson 598 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Moore 575 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Munoz 575 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Faulkner 570 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    (1978), appeal after remand
  • State v. Clayton 570 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    State v. *528 Sepulvado, appeal after remand (La.App.
  • State v. Mitchell 553 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Richardson 550 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    appeal after remand (La.App.
  • State v. Dewhirst 551 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Skipper 527 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    appeal after remand, 367 So.
  • State v. Johnson 529 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Oubre 524 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Nevertheless, , (La.1978), same case, the court expressly stated that “the imposition of a sentence although within the statutory limits may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable ...
  • State v. Smith 520 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Rochefort 504 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Preston 498 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    appeal after remand (La.App.
  • State v. Parr 498 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    appeal after remand (La.App.
  • State v. Davis 496 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Smith 496 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Piazza 496 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Nevertheless, , (La.1978), same case, the court expressly stated that “the imposition of a sentence although within the statutory limits may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable ...
  • State v. Piazza 496 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    Nevertheless, , (La.1978), same case, the court expressly stated that "the imposition of a sentence although within the statutory limits may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable ...
  • State v. Hobbs 494 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Barnes 489 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    appeal after remand the court expressly stated that "the imposition of a sentence, although within the statutory limit, may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable ...
  • State v. Rivers 470 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    appeal after remand the court expressly stated that "the imposition of a sentence, although within the statutory limit, may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable ...
  • State v. Allen 451 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Richardson 444 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Cox 441 So. 2d 723 La. 1983
  • State v. Smith 433 So. 2d 688 La. 1983
  • State v. Lewis 416 So. 2d 921 La. 1982
  • State v. Wimberly 414 So. 2d 666 La. 1982
  • State v. Latin 412 So. 2d 1357 La. 1982
  • State v. Veals 407 So. 2d 675 La. 1981
  • State v. Guillory 404 So. 2d 453 La. 1981
  • State v. Spruell 403 So. 2d 63 La. 1981