Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lee, 364 So. 2d 1024.

75 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Jyrease Havies La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
  • State of Louisiana v. Cassetti Dewayne Brown, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
  • State v. Meadows 247 So. 3d 1018 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Lee , (La.
  • State ex rel. N.B. 248 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
  • State v. Green 211 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Derrick Clark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    te may present: (1) testimony from witnesses; (2) expert opinion regarding the fingerprints of the defendant when compared with those in the prior record; (3) photographs in the duly authenticated record; or (4) evidence of identical driver[’]s license number, sex, race and date of birth.”) (emphasis added); State v. Lee, 5 -32 (La.1978); [State v.] Curtis, 338 So.2d [662] at 664 [La.1976].
  • State v. Cushenberry 146 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. White 130 So. 3d 298 La. 2013
    9 at p. 6, 810 So.2d at 1130-31 (“In attempting [to meet its burden], the State may present: (1) testimony from witnesses; (2) expert opinion regarding the fingerprints of the defendant when compared with those in the prior record; (3) photographs in the duly authenticated record; or (4) evidence of identical drivers license number, sex, |5race and date of birth.”) (emphasis added); -32 (La.1978); Curtis, 338 So.2d at 664 .
  • State v. Hayes 107 So. 3d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • Hebert v. Hebert 30 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Ivory L. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    As this court has also explained, “The right of defendant to counsel of his choice must be exercised at a reasonable time, in a reasonable manner, and at an appropriate stage within the procedural framework of the criminal justice system of which it is a part.”
  • State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
  • State v. Dilosa 849 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
  • State v. Holmes 811 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Dennis 777 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Wrestle, Inc., cert.
  • State v. Brown 773 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Texada 756 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    State v. Wrestle, Inc., cert.
  • State v. Hennis 734 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Frost 727 So. 2d 417 La. 1998
  • State v. Spradley 722 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Brazley 721 So. 2d 841 La. 1998
  • State v. Guillory 715 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Albert 697 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Keys 694 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    3rd Cir.1988), writ denied (1989) (upholding Subsection A(1))
  • State v. Batiste 687 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Hayes 670 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Champion, 412 So.2d at 1050
  • State v. Pollard 644 So. 2d 370 La. 1994
    15:529.1 are not unconstitutional on their face, and do not provide grounds for quashing a multiple bill.
  • State v. Dorthey 623 So. 2d 1276 La. 1993
  • State v. Simon 607 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Hoofkin 596 So. 2d 536 La. 1992
    State v. Wrestle, Inc., cert.
  • State v. Mitchell 580 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    State v. Champion, supra
  • State v. Johnson 552 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Mallett 552 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Issac 527 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Briggs 526 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Bennett 524 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    an insufficiency of the evidence claim was rejected where "...
  • State v. Monroe 513 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Evans 506 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Brown 504 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Smith 481 So. 2d 1388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    15:529.1 has been considered by our courts on many occassions and it has been held constitutional
  • State v. Carney 476 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Zeno 469 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Miles 464 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Jones 462 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Thomas 463 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Picchini 463 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Barberousse 458 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    See, and the cases cited therein.
  • State v. Elzy 451 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984