DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 367 So. 2d 762.

1912 citing documents.

  • State v. Fountain 976 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Jenkins 977 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Jones 975 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Sims 973 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Smith 974 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Williams 969 So. 2d 1251 La. 2007
    ar to those evolved by courts in other American jurisdictions with a constitutional or statutory duty to review excessiveness, provide appropriate criteria by which to measure whether a *1252 sentence within statutory limits is nevertheless excessive, either by reason of its length or because it specifies confinement rather than less onerous sentencing alternatives.'" ( (citation omitted))).
  • State of Louisiana v. Ziguards Stanislauvs Kokoriss La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State v. KOKORISS 970 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State v. Calloway 978 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Brister 966 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Adams 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Gerald Ray Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Chad E. Batiste La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[a] sentence may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,”
  • State v. Batiste 969 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that "[a] sentence may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit," (La.
  • State v. Zeigler 968 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Johnson, 709 So.2d at 676
  • State of Louisiana v. Herbert Davenport, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” 3 ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin D. Rogers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Rogers 966 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Davenport 967 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State v. Laurent 966 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Henry 966 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Mingo 965 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.02/25/98), .
  • State v. Harper 970 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Desoto 968 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State v. Hollins 964 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Todd Vincent Edwards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Edwards 963 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" State v. *431 Dorthey, ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Eric Harrison La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Reginald Provost La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Reginald Provost La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Jake C. Desoto La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Noel 952 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Bradley James Noel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Thomas 954 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Allen 954 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Riles 959 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Betty Findlay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    9/5/95), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[a] sentence may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,”
  • State v. Findlay 949 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that "[a] sentence may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit," (La.
  • State v. Semien 948 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Leroy Semien La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Price 952 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Batiste 947 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. John Thompson, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Moreover, “a sentencing judge does not possess unbridled discretion to impose a sentence within statutory limits, regardless of mitigating factors.” -70 (La.
  • State v. Thompson 943 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Darrel Brent Whatley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    “‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of 4 law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Ray Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[a] sentence may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,”
  • State v. Whatley 943 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Wade C. Griffin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Alan D. Simmons La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[a] sentence may violate a 4 defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,”
  • State v. Griffin 940 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    "`[T]he excessiveness *855 of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().