Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Buras v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension, 367 So. 2d 849.

42 citing documents.

Thomas D'Aquin v. the Housing Authority of New Orleans La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
of Police Pension, n.4 (La.
Colby S. Harrington v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College and Andrea … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Williams v. Parish of St. Bernard 206 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2016
49:964.” Id., 558 So.2d at 1159-60 ; (La.
Fritzner v. City of New Orleans 116 So. 3d 945 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
Daren Coutee v. the Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Coutee v. Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System 921 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the board of trustees of a police pension and relief fund is a state agency because it is a state board which “formulates or issues decisions pursuant to the statutes of Louisiana and, as such, is an “agency” within the contemplation of the Administrative Procedure
In re Forgione 821 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Brown v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 804 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
839 , where the Louisiana Supreme Court agreed that certain agencies did have a right to judicial review.
Jones v. SOUTHERN UNIV. AND a & M COLLEGE 693 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
839 , (1971), , 851 n. 4 (La.1979), for the proposition that "judicial review of an administrative proceeding is presumed to exist, as the availability of some level of review is necessary to validate administrative proceedings."
Inferno Associates, Inc. v. Division of Administration, Office of State Purchasing 692 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Powdrill 684 So. 2d 350 La. 1996
Matter of Supplemental Fuels, Inc. 656 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
See Buras v. Board of *33 Trustees of Police Pension Fund of City of New Orleans, (holding that the provisions defining the nature and scope of judicial review under the APA do not authorize a trial de novo in a reviewing court; that review is confined to the record as established before the agency, and the reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the administrativ
BP Oil Co. v. Plaquemines Parish Gov. 651 So. 2d 1322 La. 1995
Pacificorp Capital, Inc. v. State, Through Division of Administration, Office of State Purchasing 647 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
George v. Department of Fire 637 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Despite this unambiguous language, commentators suggest that one might apply the "creation test" (La.
Singletary v. Department of Public Works-Sewerage 626 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
of Trustees of Police Pension
Ogburn v. City of Shreveport 614 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
LRS 49:964; CCP Art. 3863; (La.
Matter of Am. Waste & Pollution Control 597 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
(holding that the provisions defining the nature and scope of judicial review under the APA do not authorize a trial de novo in a reviewing court; that review is confined to the record as established before the agency, and the reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the administrativ
Crochet Equipment v. Board of Sup'rs 597 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Schwartz v. Louisiana State Racing Commission 591 So. 2d 1361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
In Interest of JM 590 So. 2d 565 La. 1991
STATE, DEPT. OF REV. & TAX. v. Succession of Pope 579 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
In the Matter of American Waste & Pollution Control Co. 580 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Louisiana Chemical v. Dept. of Env. Qual. 577 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Pardue, 558 So.2d at 1160 .
Pardue v. Stephens 558 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
The distinction between a LAPA judicial review and a (La.
Hondroulis v. Schumacher 546 So. 2d 466 La. 1989
1st Cir. 1971); Bums v. Board of Trustees (La.App.
Allen v. State Bd. of Dentistry 543 So. 2d 908 La. 1989
(failure to remand case to agency for development of proper record was error); but c.f. Baton Rouge Water Works, 342 So.2d at 613 (remand unnecessary where findings and reasons for agency decision clear from administrative record).
Simon v. Lafayette Automotive, Wrecker & Towing Control Committee 532 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
49:964(A); Delta Bank &amp
Loop, Inc. v. Collector of Revenue 523 So. 2d 201 La. 1988
Delta Bank & Bowen v. Doyal, 259 La.
Simmons v. Sowela Technical Institute 458 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Save Ourselves, Inc. v. La. Environ. Cont. Com'n 452 So. 2d 1152 La. 1984
See, Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Costle, 590 F.2d 1011 (D.C.Cir.1978); K. Davis, Administrative Law (1982 Supp.) at 536 et seq.
Werner v. Board of Trustees 447 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Granger v. Garrett 445 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
49:964(A) See: Buras v. Board of Trustees of Police Fund of New Orleans [ ], supra.
Hanson v. Louisiana State Racing Com'n 436 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
West v. Louisiana Dept. of Public Safety 432 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Save Our Selves v. LA. ENVIR. CONTROL COM'N 430 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Henning v. Carrier 430 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
the court held the Administrative Procedure Act applied to proceedings of the board of trustees of the police pension fund of the city of New Orleans.
Seuzeneau v. Board of Trustees of the Firefighters Pension & Relief Fund for the New Orleans 422 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Darbonne v. Louisiana State Police Retirement Board 408 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Distinguished Leger v. State Police Retirement Board 399 So. 2d 209 La. 1981
is distinguishable and not controlling.
Leger v. State Police Retirement Board 393 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
the court, in discussing the standard of review as set forth in R.S.
Delta Bank & Trust Co. v. Lassiter 383 So. 2d 330 La. 1980
In support of its argument that such a hearing is required