Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Union Service & Maintenance Co. v. Powell, 393 So. 2d 94.

24 citing documents.

Alpine Exploration Companies, Inc. Versus Moncla Pressure Pumping, L.L.C., and Moncla Pressure Pumping Well Services, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
Union Service & Maintenance Co., (La.
Kathryn Steele and Steele Strategies, Inc. Versus Michael D. Kotler, Pelican State Industrial Medicine, Inc., McM Medclinic Management, … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
Union Service & Maintenance Co., (La.
Daneric Anderson v. Kenneth Briggs, Abc Insurance Company, Ports America Louisiana, L.L.C., Xyz Insurance Company, and Jkl Insurance … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Daniel Bennett v. Demco Energy Services, Llc, Federated Rural Electric Insurance Exchange, Cox La. 2024
fendant in a principal action by petition may bring in any person, including a codefendant, who is his warrantor, or who is or may be liable to him for all or part of the princip al demand”), and “is a device principally used for making claims of contribution or indemnity in the event that defendant is cast in judgment on the principal demand.” Union Service & Maintenance Co., (La.
State of Louisiana, Division of Administration, Office of Community Developement - Disaster Recovery Unit v. Deborah Bagert A/K/A … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
The Bagerts’ third party demand asserts claims of contribution or 1 indemnity against Bernadette Bibolet Diaz (hereinafter “Ms. Diaz”).1 See Union Service & (La.
Jeansonne v. Bonano 241 So. 3d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Herman v. Tracage Development, L.L.C. 201 So. 3d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Union Service & Maintenance Co., (La.
Judy Lyons v. Ann Knight La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Lyons v. Knight 65 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Zurich American Ins. Co. v. QUEEN'S MACHINERY CO., LTD. 8 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4th Cir.), writ denied, see, also, Justice Watson’s dissent in Union Service &amp
Paul A. Lemke v. Keiser & Auzenne, LLC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Co., (Watson, J., concurring); Lees
Lemke v. Keiser & Auzenne, LLC 922 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
*693 Co., (Watson, J., concurring); Lees, .
Simpson v. Perry 887 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Reed v. Lombard 698 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
4th Cir.), writ denied, see, also, Justice Watson’s dissent in Union Service &amp
Ballex v. Naccari 657 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
at 898, quoting Union Service & (La.
In Matter of Interdiction of Thomson 602 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
4th Cir.), writ denied, see, also, Justice Watson's dissent in Union Service &amp
Grant v. Politz 575 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Transworld Drilling Co. v. Texas General Resources, Inc. 552 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
In particular they rely on Union Service & Maintenance Co., wherein our Supreme Court stated: “The jurisprudence interpreting this provision [Article 1111] has consistently observed that the third party demand is a device principally used for making claims of contribution or indemnity in the event that defendant is cast in judgment on the principal demand.” Id.
Ortiz v. Barriffe 523 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
In Union Service & Maintenance Co., our Supreme Court granted writs to resolve the conflict of whether a party who is defamed by the allegations in a law suit must await that suit's termination before suing for defamation.
Acadiana Bank v. Hayes 498 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Union Service & Maintenance Co.
Philip Werlein, Ltd. v. Central First Baptist Church 489 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
See Union Service & Maintenance Co.
Hildebrand v. Schnell 441 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Art. 1111, Union Service &amp
Banks v. Rattler 426 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Hubbs v. Canova 427 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Union Service & Maintenance Co., Karam v. St.