Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Duncan, 390 So. 2d 859.

16 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of A.B.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Absent an admission by the defendant, specific intent “must necessarily be proven by inferences from surrounding facts and circumstances.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Tristan Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
[ concerning the crime of public bribery.]
State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.P. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Absent an admission by the defendant, specific intent “must necessarily be proven by inferences from surrounding facts and circumstances.” (La.
State v. Jones 99 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Johnson 993 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Hicks 554 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. DeShazo 504 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Pitard 462 So. 2d 178 La. 1985
State v. Hall 441 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
[ concerning the crime of public bribery.]
State v. Ruple 426 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
14:10 and 11; State v. Fontenot, 256 La.
State v. Robertson 421 So. 2d 843 La. 1982
State v. Hoffer 420 So. 2d 1090 La. 1982
State v. Richards 426 So. 2d 1314 La. 1982
Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure, Articles 841 and 920
State v. Belgard 410 So. 2d 720 La. 1982
State v. Tucker 405 So. 2d 506 La. 1981
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
State v. Lindsey 404 So. 2d 466 La. 1981