Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., 392 So. 2d 398.

205 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Andrew D. Wetzel La. 2025
Karl Pentecost v. Joseph W. Grassi, Mckeithen, Ryland, & Champagne La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
art. 2004 is “designed to afford relief against a judgment procured by methods viewed with disdain by the judiciary.” Lieber, supra at 590, citing Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., (La.
Allen Robinson v. Steve Williams, Continental Freight, Progressive Insurance, and Starr Indemnity La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
3d 573, 578 ( finding that each pleading must be reasonably construed so as to afford the litigant his day in court, arrive at the truth, and do substantial justice and that pleadings are taken for what they actually are and not for what their authors designate them); Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., n.2 La.
Successions of Milton Cotaya and Edna Cotaya La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
01/18/23), Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., fn.
State of Louisiana Versus Cornell Bolden La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
2504, 135 L.Ed.2d 194 (1996), (La.
Succession of Donna Lynn Simpson Tripp La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Wendell L. Lachney La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
09/25/15), (“Courts should look through the caption of pleadings in order to ascertain their substance and to do substantial justice to the parties”) ( n.2 (La.
Leslie C. Thompson, Danetta C. Hayes, Devin Flowers and Henry Bradley v. Tina Cockerham La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
Gregory Jones, Jr. v. the Boot Bar & Grill, C. Napco, Inc., Craig Napoli, Nancy Napoli, Aline Napoli, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Moreover, “[t]he characterization of a pleading by the litigant is not controlling and the duty of the courts is to look through a pleading’s caption to ascertain its substance and do substantial justice to the parties.” Adolph, 2016-1275, p. 1, 227 So.3d at 324 (Crain, J., concurring) (citing Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., n.2 (La.
Suzanne Savoy Santillo v. Stephen Santillo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Curtis Joseph Lawrence Versus Ashton Plantation Home Owners Association, Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Lowrie, 167 So.3d at 578, citing Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., n.1 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Sidney Cheneau La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
1990); Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Derrick Broussard La. 2022
Construing that motion as an application for post -conviction relief, see Smith v. Cajun Insulation , n.2 (La.
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. The Unopened Succession of Michael Frederick Kehoe a/k/a Michael Frederick Kehoe a/k/a Michael K. … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., ( La.
Diana Armstrong and Thomas Moore v. Arcco Company Services, Inc. d/b/a Arcco Power Systems La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., n.2 ( La.
Lexington Land Development, L.L.C. v. Chevron Pipe Line Company, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. Dixon Management Corp., Kenmore Oil Co., … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., n. 2 ( La.
Glenn Alexander v. Magalin Blade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., (La.1980).
TDX Associates, LP v. The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
2d at 1264- 65 ( citing Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., ( La.
State of Louisiana Versus Hursen A. Patin La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
9/25/15), (observing that “[c]ourts should look through the caption of pleadings in order to ascertain their substance and to do substantial justice to the parties”) ( n. 2 (La.1980)).
State v. Wells 262 So. 3d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
9/25/15), , 955 (observing that "[c]ourts should look through the caption of pleadings in order to ascertain their substance and to do substantial justice to the parties") (quoting Smith v. Cajun Insulation , , 402 n. 2 (La.1980) (internal quotation marks omitted) ).
State ex rel. Curry v. State 250 So. 3d 261 La. 2018
See Smith v. Cajun Insulation , , 402 n.2 (La.
In Re: L.M.M., Jr., a Minor La. 2018
“Courts should look through the caption of pleadings in order to ascertain their substance and to do substantial justice.” (La.
Clark v. Sedgwick CMS 247 So. 3d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See also Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc. , , 401-02 (La.1980).
Carey Dorsey v. Protemp Staffing Solutions, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 3/6/96); writ denied, 96-1315 (La.6/28/96); (quoting Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., ).
Dorsey v. Protemp Staffing Solutions, Inc. 246 So. 3d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 3/6/96), , 1376, writ denied , 96-1315 (La.6/28/96), (quoting Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc. , , 401 (La.1980) ).
State of Louisiana v. Raymond Daniel Lowrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
’ ” In Lomont v. Myer-Bennett, 16-436, p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Lowrey 228 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
’ ” In Lomont v. Myer-Bennett, 16-436, p. 5 (La.
State ex rel. Modique v. State 225 So. 3d 1053 La. 2017
art. 853; , 402 n.2 (La.
State ex rel. Sims v. State 224 So. 3d 355 La. 2017
9/2/94), (district court retains discretion to allow petitioner to supplement or amend claims before it has issued a ruling on them); , 402 n.2 (La.
Cameron Parish Police Jury, Cameron Parish Sheriff and Cameron Parish School Board v. All Taxpayers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 10/13/99), (citing Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., ).8 7 Any party defendant may answer such motion for judgment within seven days after the second publication thereof but not thereafter.
Cameron Parish Police Jury v. All Taxpayers 212 So. 3d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 10/13/99), (citing Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., ).
State ex rel. Jackson v. State 206 So. 3d 873 La. 2017
402 n.2 (“courts should look through the caption of the pleadings ...
Greene v. Succession of Alvarado 210 So. 3d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., , 402 n. 2 (La.
State v. Wilson 207 So. 3d 1196 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
2504 , 135 L.Ed.2d 194 (1996) ( (La.
State ex rel. Guidry v. State 203 So. 3d 219 La. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Sean Holloway 217 So. 3d 343 La. 2016
State ex rel. Goldston v. State 200 So. 3d 365 La. 2016
Camille Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc.
State ex rel. Wright v. State 188 So. 3d 1019 La. 2016
Adam v. Parish 43,047, 6 (La.App.2d Cir. 3/19/08) ; Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Brown, 32,995 (La.App.2d Cir. 4/5/00), .
Ezzell v. Miranne 185 So. 3d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc.
Edwards v. Edwards 186 So. 3d 698 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Certainly an action of nullity is not a substitute for a defense on the merits or an appeal, Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., (La.App.
State ex rel. Walgamotte v. State 177 So. 3d 705 La. 2015
402 n. 2 (La.1980) (“courts should look through the caption of pleadings in order to ascertain their substance and to do substantial justice”).
State ex rel. Schjenken v. State 175 So. 3d 959 La. 2015
402 n. 2 (La.1980) (“Courts should look through the caption of pleadings in order to ascertain their substance and to do substantial justice to the parties.”).
State v. Webb 175 So. 3d 954 La. 2015
402 n. 2 (La.1980) (“Courts should look through the caption of pleadings in order to ascertain their substance and to do substantial justice to the parties.”).
State v. Hamlin 174 So. 3d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Stepter v. Whitley, 93-2346 (La.10/13/95), (“As to |7all of relator’s other claims, which do not relate to the legality of the sentence itself under the applicable statutes, relator’s application is denied because the court correctly treated these issues as forming the proper basis for an application for post-conviction relief ...”); , 402 n. 2 (La.1980).
State of Louisiana, Department of Children and Family Services, in the Interest of A.L. v. Thomas Robert Lowrie 167 So. 3d 573 La. 2015
Baton Rouge Police Department, 03-2682 (La.1/16/04), ; Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., , 402 n. 2 (La.1980) (“Courts should look through the caption of pleadings in order to ascertain their substance and to do substantial justice to the parties.”).
First Bank & Trust v. Simmons 165 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2015
See Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., n. 2 (La.1980) (noting that it is well-settled that courts look beyond the caption, style and form of pleadings to determine from the substance of the pleadings the nature of the proceeding).
State v. Alexander 152 So. 3d 137 La. 2014
Stepter v. Whitley, 93-2346 (La.10/13/95), (“As to all of relator’s other claims, which do not relate to the legality of the sentence itself under the applicable statutes, relator’s application is denied because the court correctly treated these issues as forming the proper basis for an application for post-conviction relief ...”); , 402 n. 2 (La.1980).
McCarroll v. Livingston Parish Council 156 So. 3d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See also Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., -02 (La.1980).
Pouncy v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 150 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(citing Smith v. Cajun Insu *912 lotion, Inc., Thompson v. Harrington, 99-571 (La.App.