Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Knowles, 392 So. 2d 651.

150 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Carlos Anthony Toby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana Versus Alonzo W. Ford AKA "lonnie" AKA "lon" AKA "lonz" AKA "big Ford" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana Versus Reginald Bradley La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Donald Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State v. Pike 273 So. 3d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Knowles , , 654 (La.
State v. Stevens 260 So. 3d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
180 ; State v. Knowles , , 654 (La.
State v. Gumms 243 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Knowles , , 654 (La.1980) ; State v. Bridgewater , 98-658, p. 9 (La.
State v. Williams 236 So. 3d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Raymond Daniel Lowrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Lowrey 228 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Chadwick McGhee 223 So. 3d 1136 La. 2017
State v. Engle 213 So. 3d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Skylar Frank La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
The Louisiana Supreme Court stated: the Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct.
State v. Frank 192 So. 3d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The Louisiana Supreme Court stated: the Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Debbie E. Adams AKA Debbie Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. William Shupp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Shupp 185 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Johnson 178 So. 3d 1140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Crandell, 2005-1060 (La.3/10/06), ; State v. Redfearn, supra.
State v. Fairman 173 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Randle 166 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Crandell, 05-1060 (La.3/10/06), ; Broussard, supra.
State v. Mitchell 163 So. 3d 858 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Price, 899 So.2d at 635
State of Louisiana v. Isaac Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/30/05), -94, writ denied, 06-314 (La.9/1/06), (), as follows: the Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct.
State v. Thomas 159 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/30/05), -94 , writ denied, 06-314 (La.9/1/06), (), as follows: the Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct.
State v. Broussard 149 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Crandell, 2005-1060 (La.3/10/06), ; State v. Redfearn, supra; The two tests used by Louisiana courts when examining double jeopardy violations are the “distinct fact” or the Blockburger 1 test and the “same evidence test.” 2 The Blockburger test determines whether each *459 crime requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.
State v. Zeno 155 So. 3d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1189 , 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970)
State v. Powe 145 So. 3d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Under the Bloclcburger test, : The applicable rule is that where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.
State of Louisiana v. Corey W. Oliphant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Oliphant 127 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Dana Bowles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
9/1/06), (), as follows: the Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct.
State v. Bowles 123 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 12/30/05), -94 , writ denied, 06-314 (La.9/1/06), (), as follows: the Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct.
State v. Davis 115 So. 3d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
1284, 1289-90 , 43 L.Ed.2d 616 (1975) (“Traditionally the law has considered conspiracy and the completed substantive offense to be separate crimes.”); -55 (La.1981) (finding no double jeopardy violation for conspiracy to commit first degree murder and first degree murder because “in order to be convicted as a principal [to a crime], there must be proof that the crime was committed; a conviction for conspiracy does not depend upon the actual commission of the cri
State v. Seaton 112 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Brumfield 104 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
In Louisiana, the application of the doctrine has been limited 'to those cases where it is required by Ashe v. Swenson "
State of Louisiana v. Terry L. Cooley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Sherman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cooley 87 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Anderson 91 So. 3d 1080 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
the Louisiana Supreme Court outlined the Block-burger criteria for examining violations of double jeopardy: ...
State of Louisiana v. Chad E. Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Drake 71 So. 3d 452 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Patton 68 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Charles Edward Grace La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
The supreme court addressed whether a conviction as a
State v. Grace 61 So. 3d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The supreme court addressed whether a conviction as a
State v. Monroe 53 So. 3d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Williams 54 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Kendall Paul Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Davis 36 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Richard W. Black La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Black 33 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Nelson 25 So. 3d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
To determine whether two offenses are the same for purposes of double jeopardy analysis, Louisiana employs both the “Blockburger test” lifiand the “same evidence test.” State v. Price, supra.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by