Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Galliano, 396 So. 2d 1288.

75 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Lester David Cheveallier La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State Of Louisiana v. Marcus Clayton La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Julieanne Perales A/K/A Julianne Perales La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Charles Lee Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Juan Dedilos Villarreal Gamboa La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
and cases cited therein.” the supreme court held: Code of Criminal Procedure art. 559 provides, in pertinent part, that “(t)he court may permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn at any time before sentence.” In this case, however, the court permitted withdrawal of the plea after sentencing.
State of Louisiana Versus Wilfred Greenup La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
An attack on a guilty plea by means of post-conviction relief must be 7 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Roderick T. Branch La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Lawrence Michael Handley A/K/A Lawrence M. Handley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Tyler John Clause La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Nancy Rogers A/K/A Nancy Lynn Rogers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. Larry Earl Miles La. 2021
this court has held that the trial court could properly vacate a plea of guilty even after sentence when it determined that the facts surrounding a guilty plea rendered it “constitutionally deficient.” Also, this court held that the Trial Judge had authority to grant a motion to vacate the sentence and to allow the withdrawal of a plea of guilty when the plea was not both voluntary and intelligently entered.
State Of Louisiana v. Kiara Rideau La. 2020
268 (1942); see also State v. Galliano , -91 (La.
State of Louisiana v. D'Andrae L. McGarr La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State v. McGarr 268 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State v. Stock 212 So. 3d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Hart 183 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Ferguson 181 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. O'Brien 168 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), .
State v. Marlbrough 138 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Boudreaux 131 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Mendoza 113 So. 3d 288 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
State v. Rosales 94 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
State v. Young 71 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Domino 60 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
STATE EX REL. WILLIAMS v. State 999 So. 2d 1136 La. 2009
(court allows withdrawal of guilty plea when plea bargain based on "the belief on the part of all persons involved in the colloquy" that the judge could impose a suspended sentence when in fact he could not); La.C.C.
State of Louisiana v. Dominique J. Casson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
and cases cited therein.” the supreme court held: Code of Criminal Procedure art. 559 provides, in pertinent part, that “(t)he court may permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn at any time before sentence.” In this case, however, the court permitted withdrawal of the plea after sentencing.
State v. Casson 2 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
and cases cited therein.” the supreme court held: Code of Criminal Procedure art. 559 provides, in pertinent part, that “(t)he court may permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn at any time before sentence.” In this case, however, the court permitted withdrawal of the plea after sentencing.
State v. Lemon 923 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Davis, 03-488 (La.App.
State ex rel. Lee v. State 904 So. 2d 695 La. 2005
State v. Payton 894 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Davis, 03-488 (La.App.
State v. Rhea 876 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Davis 861 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Vu, 02-1243, p. 9 (La.App.
State v. Vu 846 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Temple 789 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Morris, 98-2684 (La.App.
State Ex Rel. Allen v. State 792 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
State v. McBride 776 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Casse 772 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Burnett 768 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State *791 v. Galliano, State v. Nicholas, supra .
State v. Senterfitt 771 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Gardette 760 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Trahan 752 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
LaFleur v. *924 Donnelly
State v. Pickett 746 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Davis 731 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Nicholas, supra.
State v. Pichon 684 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Guzman 665 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Hale 652 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Boros 646 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Franco 646 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
at 1711 ; State v. 5Galliano, (La.App.
State v. King 639 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Lapoint 635 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
the court explained: Since the plea colloquy is but an objective method of ascertaining and preserving an accused's state of mind, however, judicial inquiry need not focus solely upon the clarity of the words used.