Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Austin, 399 So. 2d 158.

99 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Zachary Markey Adams A/K/A Zachary Adams A/K/A Zachary Batiste La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. A. L. Simmons, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Leo Dorsey La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
at 384.2 2 Indeed, in reaffirming this principle, the Louisiana Supreme Court expressly rejected as follows the holding it would later adopt: While, we expressed the Jackson constitutional standard and the circumstantial evidence rule of La.
State of Louisiana v. Matthew L. Magrini La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
“[W]hen we review a conviction based upon circumstantial evidence we must determine that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a reasonable trier of fact could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that every reasonable hypothesis of innocence had been excluded.” Id., 414 So.2d at 321-22 ( (La.
State of Louisiana v. Raven Lamar Wiltz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Thompson 163 So. 3d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Johnson 887 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Young 800 So. 2d 847 La. 2001
State v. MM 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. M.M. 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Hawthorne 623 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Roy 606 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Daniels 607 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Major 604 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Bellamy 599 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Jackson 545 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Winzer 537 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Richardson 533 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Jones 532 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Gremillion 529 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Buxton 525 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Ford 525 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hall 524 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Saltzman 520 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Finley 520 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Prince 520 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. O'Pry 511 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Baptiste 506 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Darby 502 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Barbre 499 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Thrash 497 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Since the evidence was circumstantial, should be applied as follows: “Regarding circumstantial evidence, R.S.
State v. Sonnier 487 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Gates 478 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Benoit 477 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Rosiere 476 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Campbell 474 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Lilly 468 So. 2d 1154 La. 1985
State v. Williams 470 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Torres 470 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Harriman 469 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Ultimately, all evidence, both direct and circumstantial, must be sufficient under Jackson to satisfy a rational juror that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Milton 469 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Hart 467 So. 2d 1366 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Wade 467 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Necaise 466 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Accardo 466 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Chairs 466 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Raynal 466 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Cook 465 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Joseph 463 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
The standard of review for a as follows: "...
State v. Williams 463 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1st Cir.1983); State v. Washington, supra