Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Serrato, 424 So. 2d 214.

48 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Edward R. Budd La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
  • State Of Louisiana v. Byrielle Hebert La. 2021
  • La. 2020
  • State v. Blank 61 So. 3d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Bazley 60 So. 3d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 6/27/01), , unit denied, 01-2231 (La.6/14/02), , citing
  • State v. Floyd 7 So. 3d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    the Supreme Court reviewed a claim that neither the defendant nor his attorney was present for the court’s ruling on a Motion to Suppress.
  • State v. McGee 894 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    In support of his argument, , (La.1982), in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held: Once a defendant asserts that his confession was obtained in such a manner, the state must rebut the defendant's allegations to carry its burden of proving the voluntariness of the confession.
  • State v. McKinnie 850 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    87 , 145 L.Ed.2d 74 (1999)
  • State v. Blank 804 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Hopkins 799 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Although promises or inducements will void a defendant's confession, a mild exhortation to tell the truth, or an indication that if the defendant cooperates the officer will "do what he can" or "things will go easier" will not negate the voluntary nature of a confession.
  • State v. Narcisse 791 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Quest 772 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    Dunn, 651 So.2d at 1387 .
  • State v. Carter 767 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    Additionally, he states that once defense counsel has made himself available
  • State v. Dotson 747 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Buffington 731 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    2254, 2261-62 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); (La.
  • State v. Brown 715 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Thomas 711 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Although promises or inducements will void a defendant's confession, a mild exhortation to tell the truth, or an indication that if the defendant cooperates the officer will "do what he can" or "things will go easier," will not negate the voluntary nature of a confession.
  • State v. Dunn 651 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Smith 638 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    where the Louisiana Supreme Court held that defendant's failure to address a contention that his confession was the product of an illegal arrest and was procured in violation of his right to counsel in his pretrial motion did not preclude him from raising the issues on appeal.
  • State v. Van Winkle 635 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Hicks 607 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. English 582 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Sylvas 558 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    Defendant submits that the failure to attempt to suppress the identification, which allegedly amounted to a denial of due process
  • State v. Simms 554 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975)
  • State v. Woods 553 So. 2d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Bray 548 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. McKnight 539 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Cade 539 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • State v. McClintock 535 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Hahn 526 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Wascom 524 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Jackson 523 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Upchurch 510 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Williams 499 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Allen 478 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    *594 the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that: Once counsel has been obtained for the defendant, he has the right to be informed that an attorney is available and willing to assist him.
  • State v. Henderson 471 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Brockett 471 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Thomas 470 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    202 , 78 L.Ed.2d 176 (1983); (La.
  • State v. Johnson 457 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Birdsong 452 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Shepherd 449 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Wilms 449 So. 2d 442 La. 1984
  • State v. Thomas 439 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Brooks 434 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Neslo 433 So. 2d 73 La. 1983
    State v. Burkhalter, supra
  • State v. Hernandez 432 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Harper 430 So. 2d 627 La. 1983