Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vaughn, 431 So. 2d 763.
-
State of Louisiana v. Donald P. Lemoine
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
It argues that the trial court erroneously applied the “same evidence test,” contrary to the supreme court’s holding in State v. Frank, 16-1160 (La.
- State of Louisiana v. Monteco K. Frost La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
- State v. Hardyway 266 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
-
State v. Turner
259 So. 3d 1089
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2072 , 2076, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969) ; State v. Vaughn , , 767 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Skylar Frank
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
the accused was charged with one count of malfeasance in office and one count of theft.
- State v. Frank 192 So. 3d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-
State of Louisiana v. Isaac Thomas
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/30/05), -94, writ denied, 06-314 (La.9/1/06), (), as follows: the Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct.
-
State v. Thomas
159 So. 3d 1115
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/30/05), -94 , writ denied, 06-314 (La.9/1/06), (), as follows: the Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct.
-
State v. Morrison
137 So. 3d 736
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2072, 2076 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Warner, 94-2649, p. 4 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Dana Bowles
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
9/1/06), (), as follows: the Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct.
-
State v. Bowles
123 So. 3d 350
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 12/30/05), -94 , writ denied, 06-314 (La.9/1/06), (), as follows: the Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct.
-
State v. Mills
120 So. 3d 802
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969), rev’d on other grounds
-
State v. Holloway
120 So. 3d 795
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2072, 2076 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Warner, 94-2649, p. 4 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Alex P. Papillion
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions the test to be applied to determine whether there are two different offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.”
-
State v. Papillion
63 So. 3d 414
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions the test to be applied to determine whether there are two different offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.”
- State of Louisiana v. Daniel L. Pegues La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- State v. Pegues 43 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- State v. Powell 968 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
- State v. Jefferson 920 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
-
State of Louisiana v. Donald Cogswell, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
the accused was charged with one count of malfeasance in office and one count of theft.
-
State v. Cogswell
918 So. 2d 590
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
the accused was charged with one count of malfeasance in office and one count of theft.
- State v. Price 899 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
-
State v. Gibson
867 So. 2d 793
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
See, e.g., State v. Murray, 2000-1258 (La.9/18/01), ; State v. Harris, 98-2932, p. 6 (La.
-
State v. Gobert
865 So. 2d 779
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); ).
- State of Louisiana v. Steven D. Gobert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
-
State v. Bates
859 So. 2d 841
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Gay, 36,357 (La.
-
State v. Robinson
848 So. 2d 642
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
citing, North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 , 89 S.Ct.
- State v. Kelley 836 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
-
State v. Gay
830 So. 2d 356
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Coates, 27,287 (La.App.2d Cir.09/27/95), , writ denied, 95-2613 (La.02/28/96), .
-
State v. Gay
830 So. 2d 356
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Coates, 27,287 (La.App.2d Cir.09/27/95), , writ denied, 95-2613 (La.02/28/96), .
- State v. Burt 828 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- State v. Davies 813 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. White 799 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
- State v. Pierce 799 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
-
State v. Jones
799 So. 2d 772
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
art. 596; State v. Vaughn [ (1983)], supra, and cases cited therein.
-
State v. Allen
793 So. 2d 426
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Edward, 98-2932 (La.App.
- State v. Arnold 801 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
- State v. Lewis 776 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Harris 761 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Baptiste 759 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
-
State v. Downey
744 So. 2d 128
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Watson, 97-0353, p. 4 (La.App.
-
State v. Texada
734 So. 2d 854
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969)
- State v. Jones 731 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
- State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
-
State v. Watson
706 So. 2d 1044
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969), rev'd on other grounds
-
State v. Cole
702 So. 2d 832
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969)
- State v. Amato 698 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- State v. Guccione 694 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
- State v. Gaines 688 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
- State v. Woodberry 686 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996